术前经皮肝引流术:使用或滥用。临床回顾。

Surgical gastroenterology Pub Date : 1984-01-01
D J Gouma, F G Moody
{"title":"术前经皮肝引流术:使用或滥用。临床回顾。","authors":"D J Gouma,&nbsp;F G Moody","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefit of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice was reviewed in the literature from 1974 to July 1984. The role of preoperative drainage cannot be definitively assessed. Significant reduction of morbidity and mortality has been reported in some non-controlled studies; however, no benefit of preoperative \"external\" drainage was found in the only two reported randomized studies. At the present time external preoperative drainage cannot be advised routinely and the hazards of this technique and effect of bile losses may outweigh the benefits. The benefits of preoperative internal drainage without bile loss and closing of the enterohepatic cycle needs to be evaluated both percutaneously and endoscopically. Criteria, developed after specific identification of high risk patients, should be used to select patients for biliary drainage and to evaluate results of drainage studies. The clinical well-accepted drainage period of 2-4 weeks is controversial and the optimum period of drainage also requires further evaluation. The percutaneous approach carries significant morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":79268,"journal":{"name":"Surgical gastroenterology","volume":"3 2","pages":"74-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic drainage: use or abuse. A clinical review.\",\"authors\":\"D J Gouma,&nbsp;F G Moody\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The benefit of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice was reviewed in the literature from 1974 to July 1984. The role of preoperative drainage cannot be definitively assessed. Significant reduction of morbidity and mortality has been reported in some non-controlled studies; however, no benefit of preoperative \\\"external\\\" drainage was found in the only two reported randomized studies. At the present time external preoperative drainage cannot be advised routinely and the hazards of this technique and effect of bile losses may outweigh the benefits. The benefits of preoperative internal drainage without bile loss and closing of the enterohepatic cycle needs to be evaluated both percutaneously and endoscopically. Criteria, developed after specific identification of high risk patients, should be used to select patients for biliary drainage and to evaluate results of drainage studies. The clinical well-accepted drainage period of 2-4 weeks is controversial and the optimum period of drainage also requires further evaluation. The percutaneous approach carries significant morbidity and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"74-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从1974年到1984年7月的文献回顾了术前经皮经肝胆道引流对梗阻性黄疸患者的益处。术前引流的作用还不能确定。一些非对照研究报告了发病率和死亡率的显著降低;然而,在仅有的两项随机研究中,没有发现术前“外部”引流的益处。目前,术前外引流不能作为常规建议,这种技术的危害和胆汁损失的影响可能大于其益处。术前无胆汁丢失的内引流和关闭肠肝循环的益处需要经皮和内窥镜评估。在确定高危患者后制定的标准应用于选择胆道引流患者和评估引流研究结果。临床普遍接受的2 ~ 4周引流期存在争议,最佳引流期也需进一步评估。经皮入路有很高的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic drainage: use or abuse. A clinical review.

The benefit of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice was reviewed in the literature from 1974 to July 1984. The role of preoperative drainage cannot be definitively assessed. Significant reduction of morbidity and mortality has been reported in some non-controlled studies; however, no benefit of preoperative "external" drainage was found in the only two reported randomized studies. At the present time external preoperative drainage cannot be advised routinely and the hazards of this technique and effect of bile losses may outweigh the benefits. The benefits of preoperative internal drainage without bile loss and closing of the enterohepatic cycle needs to be evaluated both percutaneously and endoscopically. Criteria, developed after specific identification of high risk patients, should be used to select patients for biliary drainage and to evaluate results of drainage studies. The clinical well-accepted drainage period of 2-4 weeks is controversial and the optimum period of drainage also requires further evaluation. The percutaneous approach carries significant morbidity and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信