氧化裂解ADMAdda、dadda和Adda片段分析总微囊藻毒素和结核素

IF 2.5 Q1 Chemistry
Amanda J. Foss , Christopher O. Miles , Alistair L. Wilkins , Frode Rise , Kristian W. Trovik , Kamil Cieslik , Mark T. Aubel
{"title":"氧化裂解ADMAdda、dadda和Adda片段分析总微囊藻毒素和结核素","authors":"Amanda J. Foss ,&nbsp;Christopher O. Miles ,&nbsp;Alistair L. Wilkins ,&nbsp;Frode Rise ,&nbsp;Kristian W. Trovik ,&nbsp;Kamil Cieslik ,&nbsp;Mark T. Aubel","doi":"10.1016/j.acax.2020.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microcystins (MCs) and nodularins (NODs) exhibit high structural variability, including modifications of the Adda (3<em>S</em>-amino-9<em>S</em>-methoxy-2<em>S</em>,6,8<em>S</em>-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4<em>E</em>,6<em>E</em>-dienoic acid) moiety. Variations include 9-<em>O</em>-desmethylAdda (DMAdda) and 9-<em>O</em>-acetylDMAdda (ADMAdda) which, unless targeted, may go undetected. Therefore, reference standards were prepared of [ADMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MCs and [DMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MCs, which were analyzed using multiple approaches. The cross-reactivities of the [DMAdda<sup>5</sup>]- and [ADMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MC standards were similar to that of MC-LR when analyzed with a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibition assay, but were &lt;0.25% when analyzed with an Adda enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Oxidative cleavage experiments identified compounds that could be used in the analysis of total MCs/NODs in a similar fashion to the 2<em>R</em>-methyl-3<em>S</em>-methoxy-4-phenylbutanoic acid (MMPB) technique. Products from oxidative cleavage of both the 4,5- and 6,7-ene of Adda, DMAdda and ADMAdda were observed, and three oxidation products, one from each Adda variant, were chosen for analysis and applied to three field samples and a <em>Nostoc</em> culture. Results from the oxidative cleavage method for total Adda, DMAdda, and ADMAdda were similar to those from the Adda-ELISA, PP2A inhibition, and LC-MS/MS analyses, except for the <em>Nostoc</em> culture where the Adda-ELISA greatly underestimated microcystin levels. This oxidative cleavage method can be used for routine analysis of field samples and to assess the presence of the rarely reported, but toxic, DMAdda/ADMAdda-containing MCs and NODs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":241,"journal":{"name":"Analytica Chimica Acta: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100060","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of total microcystins and nodularins by oxidative cleavage of their ADMAdda, DMAdda, and Adda moieties\",\"authors\":\"Amanda J. Foss ,&nbsp;Christopher O. Miles ,&nbsp;Alistair L. Wilkins ,&nbsp;Frode Rise ,&nbsp;Kristian W. Trovik ,&nbsp;Kamil Cieslik ,&nbsp;Mark T. Aubel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acax.2020.100060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Microcystins (MCs) and nodularins (NODs) exhibit high structural variability, including modifications of the Adda (3<em>S</em>-amino-9<em>S</em>-methoxy-2<em>S</em>,6,8<em>S</em>-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4<em>E</em>,6<em>E</em>-dienoic acid) moiety. Variations include 9-<em>O</em>-desmethylAdda (DMAdda) and 9-<em>O</em>-acetylDMAdda (ADMAdda) which, unless targeted, may go undetected. Therefore, reference standards were prepared of [ADMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MCs and [DMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MCs, which were analyzed using multiple approaches. The cross-reactivities of the [DMAdda<sup>5</sup>]- and [ADMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MC standards were similar to that of MC-LR when analyzed with a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibition assay, but were &lt;0.25% when analyzed with an Adda enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Oxidative cleavage experiments identified compounds that could be used in the analysis of total MCs/NODs in a similar fashion to the 2<em>R</em>-methyl-3<em>S</em>-methoxy-4-phenylbutanoic acid (MMPB) technique. Products from oxidative cleavage of both the 4,5- and 6,7-ene of Adda, DMAdda and ADMAdda were observed, and three oxidation products, one from each Adda variant, were chosen for analysis and applied to three field samples and a <em>Nostoc</em> culture. Results from the oxidative cleavage method for total Adda, DMAdda, and ADMAdda were similar to those from the Adda-ELISA, PP2A inhibition, and LC-MS/MS analyses, except for the <em>Nostoc</em> culture where the Adda-ELISA greatly underestimated microcystin levels. This oxidative cleavage method can be used for routine analysis of field samples and to assess the presence of the rarely reported, but toxic, DMAdda/ADMAdda-containing MCs and NODs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta: X\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100060\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590134620300220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytica Chimica Acta: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590134620300220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

微囊藻毒素(MCs)和结节蛋白(NODs)具有高度的结构变变性,包括Adda (3s -氨基- 9s -甲氧基- 2s, 6,8s -三甲基-10-苯基十二- 4e, 6e -二烯酸)片段的修饰。变异包括9- o -去甲基adda (DMAdda)和9- o -乙酰基DMAdda (ADMAdda),除非靶向,否则可能无法检测到。为此,制备了[adadda5]和[DMAdda5]MCs的参比标准,并采用多种方法对其进行分析。用蛋白磷酸酶2A (PP2A)抑制试验分析,[DMAdda5]-和[adadda5]MC标准物的交叉反应性与MC- lr相似,但用Adda酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)分析时,交叉反应性为<0.25%。氧化裂解实验确定了可用于总MCs/NODs分析的化合物,类似于2r -甲基- 3s -甲氧基-4-苯基丁酸(MMPB)技术。对Adda、DMAdda和ADMAdda的4,5-和6,7-烯氧化裂解产物进行了观察,并从每个Adda变体中选择了三个氧化产物进行分析,并应用于三个现场样品和Nostoc培养。氧化裂解法测定总Adda、DMAdda和ADMAdda的结果与Adda- elisa、PP2A抑制和LC-MS/MS分析的结果相似,除了在Nostoc培养中,Adda- elisa大大低估了微囊藻毒素的水平。这种氧化裂解方法可以用于野外样品的常规分析,并评估很少报道但有毒的含有DMAdda/ adadda的mc和nod的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of total microcystins and nodularins by oxidative cleavage of their ADMAdda, DMAdda, and Adda moieties

Analysis of total microcystins and nodularins by oxidative cleavage of their ADMAdda, DMAdda, and Adda moieties

Microcystins (MCs) and nodularins (NODs) exhibit high structural variability, including modifications of the Adda (3S-amino-9S-methoxy-2S,6,8S-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4E,6E-dienoic acid) moiety. Variations include 9-O-desmethylAdda (DMAdda) and 9-O-acetylDMAdda (ADMAdda) which, unless targeted, may go undetected. Therefore, reference standards were prepared of [ADMAdda5]MCs and [DMAdda5]MCs, which were analyzed using multiple approaches. The cross-reactivities of the [DMAdda5]- and [ADMAdda5]MC standards were similar to that of MC-LR when analyzed with a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibition assay, but were <0.25% when analyzed with an Adda enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Oxidative cleavage experiments identified compounds that could be used in the analysis of total MCs/NODs in a similar fashion to the 2R-methyl-3S-methoxy-4-phenylbutanoic acid (MMPB) technique. Products from oxidative cleavage of both the 4,5- and 6,7-ene of Adda, DMAdda and ADMAdda were observed, and three oxidation products, one from each Adda variant, were chosen for analysis and applied to three field samples and a Nostoc culture. Results from the oxidative cleavage method for total Adda, DMAdda, and ADMAdda were similar to those from the Adda-ELISA, PP2A inhibition, and LC-MS/MS analyses, except for the Nostoc culture where the Adda-ELISA greatly underestimated microcystin levels. This oxidative cleavage method can be used for routine analysis of field samples and to assess the presence of the rarely reported, but toxic, DMAdda/ADMAdda-containing MCs and NODs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytica Chimica Acta: X
Analytica Chimica Acta: X Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信