风味-疾病厌恶:大鼠因毒素而非休克而通过味觉增强气味。

K W Rusiniak, C C Palmerino, A G Rice, D L Forthman, J Garcia
{"title":"风味-疾病厌恶:大鼠因毒素而非休克而通过味觉增强气味。","authors":"K W Rusiniak,&nbsp;C C Palmerino,&nbsp;A G Rice,&nbsp;D L Forthman,&nbsp;J Garcia","doi":"10.1037/h0077902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Potentiation of odor by taste in rats was tested in a variety of situations. In three experiments, almond odor and saccharin taste were presented either as a single conditioned stimulus (CS) or as a compound CS and followed by either toxic lithium chloride or footshock. Extinction tests with the almond and saccharin components were then given. In single CS-toxin experiments, taste was more effective than odor, and after compound conditioning, the taste component potentiated the odor component. Conversely, in single CS-shock experiments, odor was more effective than taste, and after compound conditioning, no potentiation was observed. Rather, interference effects were observed. In Experiments 1 and 2, the addition of taste disrupted odor CS-shock conditioning, and in Experiment 3, odor interfered with taste CS-shock conditioning. Visceral feedback is apparently a necessary unconditioned stimulus for the potentiation of odor by taste. These data support the neural convergence and gating hypothesis of flavor aversion conditioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","volume":"96 4","pages":"527-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0077902","citationCount":"108","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flavor-illness aversions: potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats.\",\"authors\":\"K W Rusiniak,&nbsp;C C Palmerino,&nbsp;A G Rice,&nbsp;D L Forthman,&nbsp;J Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/h0077902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Potentiation of odor by taste in rats was tested in a variety of situations. In three experiments, almond odor and saccharin taste were presented either as a single conditioned stimulus (CS) or as a compound CS and followed by either toxic lithium chloride or footshock. Extinction tests with the almond and saccharin components were then given. In single CS-toxin experiments, taste was more effective than odor, and after compound conditioning, the taste component potentiated the odor component. Conversely, in single CS-shock experiments, odor was more effective than taste, and after compound conditioning, no potentiation was observed. Rather, interference effects were observed. In Experiments 1 and 2, the addition of taste disrupted odor CS-shock conditioning, and in Experiment 3, odor interfered with taste CS-shock conditioning. Visceral feedback is apparently a necessary unconditioned stimulus for the potentiation of odor by taste. These data support the neural convergence and gating hypothesis of flavor aversion conditioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology\",\"volume\":\"96 4\",\"pages\":\"527-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0077902\",\"citationCount\":\"108\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

摘要

在各种情况下测试了老鼠的味觉对气味的增强作用。在三个实验中,杏仁气味和糖精味道分别作为单一条件刺激(CS)或复合条件刺激(CS)呈现,随后分别有毒性氯化锂或足部刺激。然后进行了杏仁和糖精成分的消光试验。在单一的cs毒素实验中,味觉成分比气味成分更有效,并且经过复合调理后,味觉成分增强了气味成分。相反,在单次CS-shock实验中,气味比味觉更有效,并且在复合调理后,没有观察到增强。相反,观察到干涉效应。在实验1和2中,味觉干扰了气味CS-shock调节,在实验3中,气味干扰了味觉CS-shock调节。内脏反馈显然是味觉增强气味的必要的无条件刺激。这些数据支持了气味厌恶条件反射的神经收敛和门控假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flavor-illness aversions: potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats.

Potentiation of odor by taste in rats was tested in a variety of situations. In three experiments, almond odor and saccharin taste were presented either as a single conditioned stimulus (CS) or as a compound CS and followed by either toxic lithium chloride or footshock. Extinction tests with the almond and saccharin components were then given. In single CS-toxin experiments, taste was more effective than odor, and after compound conditioning, the taste component potentiated the odor component. Conversely, in single CS-shock experiments, odor was more effective than taste, and after compound conditioning, no potentiation was observed. Rather, interference effects were observed. In Experiments 1 and 2, the addition of taste disrupted odor CS-shock conditioning, and in Experiment 3, odor interfered with taste CS-shock conditioning. Visceral feedback is apparently a necessary unconditioned stimulus for the potentiation of odor by taste. These data support the neural convergence and gating hypothesis of flavor aversion conditioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信