人盘尾丝虫病的血清学诊断:纯化的卡氏绒蚧成虫抗原的敏感性和特异性评价。

Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie Pub Date : 1984-06-01
A Klenk, E Geyer, H Zahner
{"title":"人盘尾丝虫病的血清学诊断:纯化的卡氏绒蚧成虫抗原的敏感性和特异性评价。","authors":"A Klenk,&nbsp;E Geyer,&nbsp;H Zahner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensitivity and specificity of a Litomosoides carinii macrofilariae aqueous crude extract and a purified antigen which was isolated by preparative flat bed electrofocusing, were evaluated for the immunodiagnosis of human onchocerciasis in 3 serological tests: Double diffusion test (DT), latex agglutination test (LAT) and ELISA. Testing sera from proven cases of onchocerciasis (n = 28), loiasis (n = 4) filariasis bancrofti (n = 4), and other non filarial helminth infections (n = 29) in all tests the purified antigen was clearly more sensitive and specific. Testing onchocerciasis sera highest sensitivity was found by ELISA (92.9%) followed by latex agglutination test (89.3%) and double diffusion test (82.1%). Specificity controls of the purified antigen with sera from patients with helminth infections others than filariases led to 0% (DT), 6.9% (LAT) and 10.3% (ELISA) false positive reactions. When the 3 tests were used in combination in a way that at least two positive reactions in different tests were regarded as necessary to declare a serum as positive, sensitivity increased to 100% and unspecific reactions were found only testing one serum (3.4%) originating from a case of cystic echinococcosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":76764,"journal":{"name":"Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie","volume":"35 2","pages":"81-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serodiagnosis of human onchocerciasis: evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of a purified Litomosoides carinii adult worm antigen.\",\"authors\":\"A Klenk,&nbsp;E Geyer,&nbsp;H Zahner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sensitivity and specificity of a Litomosoides carinii macrofilariae aqueous crude extract and a purified antigen which was isolated by preparative flat bed electrofocusing, were evaluated for the immunodiagnosis of human onchocerciasis in 3 serological tests: Double diffusion test (DT), latex agglutination test (LAT) and ELISA. Testing sera from proven cases of onchocerciasis (n = 28), loiasis (n = 4) filariasis bancrofti (n = 4), and other non filarial helminth infections (n = 29) in all tests the purified antigen was clearly more sensitive and specific. Testing onchocerciasis sera highest sensitivity was found by ELISA (92.9%) followed by latex agglutination test (89.3%) and double diffusion test (82.1%). Specificity controls of the purified antigen with sera from patients with helminth infections others than filariases led to 0% (DT), 6.9% (LAT) and 10.3% (ELISA) false positive reactions. When the 3 tests were used in combination in a way that at least two positive reactions in different tests were regarded as necessary to declare a serum as positive, sensitivity increased to 100% and unspecific reactions were found only testing one serum (3.4%) originating from a case of cystic echinococcosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"81-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用双扩散试验(DT)、胶乳凝集试验(LAT)和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),评价了大丝状Litomosoides carinii macrofilariae水提液和纯化抗原对人盘尾丝虫病的免疫诊断敏感性和特异性。经证实的盘尾丝虫病(n = 28)、丝虫病(n = 4)、班氏丝虫病(n = 4)和其他非丝虫病感染(n = 29)的血清检测,纯化抗原明显更敏感和特异性更高。ELISA检测盘尾丝虫病血清灵敏度最高(92.9%),其次为胶乳凝集试验(89.3%)和双重扩散试验(82.1%)。将纯化抗原与除丝虫病外的寄生虫感染患者血清特异性对照,假阳性反应分别为0% (DT)、6.9% (LAT)和10.3% (ELISA)。当这3种检测方法联合使用时,在不同的检测中至少有两种阳性反应被认为是宣布血清阳性的必要条件,敏感性增加到100%,并且仅检测来自囊性包虫病病例的一种血清(3.4%)发现非特异性反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Serodiagnosis of human onchocerciasis: evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of a purified Litomosoides carinii adult worm antigen.

Sensitivity and specificity of a Litomosoides carinii macrofilariae aqueous crude extract and a purified antigen which was isolated by preparative flat bed electrofocusing, were evaluated for the immunodiagnosis of human onchocerciasis in 3 serological tests: Double diffusion test (DT), latex agglutination test (LAT) and ELISA. Testing sera from proven cases of onchocerciasis (n = 28), loiasis (n = 4) filariasis bancrofti (n = 4), and other non filarial helminth infections (n = 29) in all tests the purified antigen was clearly more sensitive and specific. Testing onchocerciasis sera highest sensitivity was found by ELISA (92.9%) followed by latex agglutination test (89.3%) and double diffusion test (82.1%). Specificity controls of the purified antigen with sera from patients with helminth infections others than filariases led to 0% (DT), 6.9% (LAT) and 10.3% (ELISA) false positive reactions. When the 3 tests were used in combination in a way that at least two positive reactions in different tests were regarded as necessary to declare a serum as positive, sensitivity increased to 100% and unspecific reactions were found only testing one serum (3.4%) originating from a case of cystic echinococcosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信