{"title":"病毒诱导干扰素:一个dsRNA分子作为干扰素诱导的阈值。","authors":"P I Marcus","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The studies chronicled in this chapter were chosen largely because they contained data amenable to the quantitative analysis of interferon induction dose-response curves and the IFP activity they represented. The interpretation of the data was predicated on the assumption that a single molecule of dsRNA, when properly introduced into a cell, either as a preformed entity or formed therein following some synthetic event, can induce a quantum yield of interferon. This novel view of interferon induction by viruses has provided an explanation for many seemingly discordant results and offers a unifying hypothesis regarding the nature of the interferon inducer moiety for viruses from widely different families. If we note the reluctance of some to accept dsRNA as a common interferon inducer molecule ( McKimm and Rapp , 1977; Kowal and Youngner , 1978; Joklik , 1980) but recognize that the threshold for activating the interferon induction system is one molecule per cell, many aspects of interferon induction heretofore enigmatic are rendered offerpretable . Furthermore, one molecule of dsRNA per cell suffices to induce a quantum yield of interferon, an apparent expression of the \"one-shot affair\" of interferon production recognized by Ho (1964). In some cases of induction (the r = 1 type dose-response curve) there is an exquisitely responsive modulation of production when a second molecule of dsRNA is simultaneously introduced into the cell. The experimental approach and concepts discussed herein offer a new perspective on the mechanism of interferon induction by viruses and its regulation, and point out the incredible biological potency of a dsRNA molecule--a molecule found to play a key role in viral infection and host defence (Carter and De Clercq , 1974), regulation of the immune system (Johnson, 1980), and perhaps some yet to be defined function in cell growth (Taylor- Papadimitriou , 1980) and differentiation ( Grossberg and Sabran , 1981-2) through its capacity to activate the interferon system.</p>","PeriodicalId":77727,"journal":{"name":"Interferon","volume":"5 ","pages":"115-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interferon induction by viruses: one molecule of dsRNA as the threshold for interferon induction.\",\"authors\":\"P I Marcus\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The studies chronicled in this chapter were chosen largely because they contained data amenable to the quantitative analysis of interferon induction dose-response curves and the IFP activity they represented. The interpretation of the data was predicated on the assumption that a single molecule of dsRNA, when properly introduced into a cell, either as a preformed entity or formed therein following some synthetic event, can induce a quantum yield of interferon. This novel view of interferon induction by viruses has provided an explanation for many seemingly discordant results and offers a unifying hypothesis regarding the nature of the interferon inducer moiety for viruses from widely different families. If we note the reluctance of some to accept dsRNA as a common interferon inducer molecule ( McKimm and Rapp , 1977; Kowal and Youngner , 1978; Joklik , 1980) but recognize that the threshold for activating the interferon induction system is one molecule per cell, many aspects of interferon induction heretofore enigmatic are rendered offerpretable . Furthermore, one molecule of dsRNA per cell suffices to induce a quantum yield of interferon, an apparent expression of the \\\"one-shot affair\\\" of interferon production recognized by Ho (1964). In some cases of induction (the r = 1 type dose-response curve) there is an exquisitely responsive modulation of production when a second molecule of dsRNA is simultaneously introduced into the cell. The experimental approach and concepts discussed herein offer a new perspective on the mechanism of interferon induction by viruses and its regulation, and point out the incredible biological potency of a dsRNA molecule--a molecule found to play a key role in viral infection and host defence (Carter and De Clercq , 1974), regulation of the immune system (Johnson, 1980), and perhaps some yet to be defined function in cell growth (Taylor- Papadimitriou , 1980) and differentiation ( Grossberg and Sabran , 1981-2) through its capacity to activate the interferon system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interferon\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"115-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interferon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interferon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
选择本章中记录的研究主要是因为它们包含了干扰素诱导剂量-反应曲线及其所代表的IFP活性的定量分析数据。对这些数据的解释是基于这样一个假设:当一个dsRNA的单分子被适当地引入细胞时,无论是作为一个预先形成的实体,还是在一些合成事件之后形成的,都可以诱导干扰素的量子产量。这种病毒诱导干扰素的新观点为许多看似不一致的结果提供了解释,并为来自广泛不同家族的病毒的干扰素诱导剂部分的性质提供了一个统一的假设。如果我们注意到一些人不愿意接受dsRNA作为一种常见的干扰素诱导分子(McKimm和Rapp, 1977;Kowal and Youngner, 1978;Joklik, 1980),但认识到激活干扰素诱导系统的阈值是每个细胞一个分子,干扰素诱导的许多方面迄今为止是谜一样的。此外,每个细胞一个dsRNA分子足以诱导干扰素的量子产量,这显然是Ho(1964)认识到的干扰素生产的“一次性事件”的表达。在某些诱导情况下(r = 1型剂量-反应曲线),当第二个dsRNA分子同时被引入细胞时,会有一个非常灵敏的反应调节。本文讨论的实验方法和概念为病毒诱导干扰素及其调控的机制提供了一个新的视角,并指出了dsRNA分子令人难以置信的生物学潜力——一种在病毒感染和宿主防御(Carter and De Clercq, 1974)、免疫系统调控(Johnson, 1980)中发挥关键作用的分子,以及可能在细胞生长中一些尚未确定的功能(Taylor- Papadimitriou,1980)和分化(Grossberg和Sabran, 1981-2)通过其激活干扰素系统的能力。
Interferon induction by viruses: one molecule of dsRNA as the threshold for interferon induction.
The studies chronicled in this chapter were chosen largely because they contained data amenable to the quantitative analysis of interferon induction dose-response curves and the IFP activity they represented. The interpretation of the data was predicated on the assumption that a single molecule of dsRNA, when properly introduced into a cell, either as a preformed entity or formed therein following some synthetic event, can induce a quantum yield of interferon. This novel view of interferon induction by viruses has provided an explanation for many seemingly discordant results and offers a unifying hypothesis regarding the nature of the interferon inducer moiety for viruses from widely different families. If we note the reluctance of some to accept dsRNA as a common interferon inducer molecule ( McKimm and Rapp , 1977; Kowal and Youngner , 1978; Joklik , 1980) but recognize that the threshold for activating the interferon induction system is one molecule per cell, many aspects of interferon induction heretofore enigmatic are rendered offerpretable . Furthermore, one molecule of dsRNA per cell suffices to induce a quantum yield of interferon, an apparent expression of the "one-shot affair" of interferon production recognized by Ho (1964). In some cases of induction (the r = 1 type dose-response curve) there is an exquisitely responsive modulation of production when a second molecule of dsRNA is simultaneously introduced into the cell. The experimental approach and concepts discussed herein offer a new perspective on the mechanism of interferon induction by viruses and its regulation, and point out the incredible biological potency of a dsRNA molecule--a molecule found to play a key role in viral infection and host defence (Carter and De Clercq , 1974), regulation of the immune system (Johnson, 1980), and perhaps some yet to be defined function in cell growth (Taylor- Papadimitriou , 1980) and differentiation ( Grossberg and Sabran , 1981-2) through its capacity to activate the interferon system.