胸膜和腹膜积液细胞中CEA、ZGM和EMA定位的初步研究。

Investigative & cell pathology Pub Date : 1980-07-01
M J O'Brien, S E Kirkham, B Burke, M Ormerod, C A Saravis, L S Gottlieb, A M Neville, N Zamcheck
{"title":"胸膜和腹膜积液细胞中CEA、ZGM和EMA定位的初步研究。","authors":"M J O'Brien,&nbsp;S E Kirkham,&nbsp;B Burke,&nbsp;M Ormerod,&nbsp;C A Saravis,&nbsp;L S Gottlieb,&nbsp;A M Neville,&nbsp;N Zamcheck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the zinc glycinate marker (ZGM) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) have been described as epithelial or tumour markers of varying specificity. These antigens were studied by immunoperoxidase localization in selected cell blocks of 62 pleural or peritoneal effusions and compared to cytological findings and review of the clinical records. By cytological criteria, 25 of the cell blocks were positive for malignancy, 30 negative, and 7 inconclusive. CEA, ZGM, and EMA by immunoperoxidase staining were localized on the cell surface and often in the cytoplasm of malignant cells, in 11/25 (44 per cent), 17/25 (68 per cent) and 22/25 (88 per cent) of the positive cell blocks respectively. Ten (40 per cent) of these cases were positive for all three antigens, 7 (28 per cent) for two, and 6 (24 per cent) for one. Of the 7 cases which were inconclusive on routine cytological reporting, 5 were positive for at least one marker. In 3 of the 5 a diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed, and in the other two was strongly suspected as malignant on clinical grounds. Macrophages were sometimes positive for one or more markers (but showed cytoplasmic staining only) and mesothelial cells in some cases stained positively for EMA but were always negative for CEA and ZGM. Localization of the 3 antigens in cells of malignant effusions was compared with their localization in the primary tumours in 9 cases. Localization corresponded for CEA in 7 of 9 cases, for EMA in 8 of 8 an for ZGM in only 2 of 9. Effusion fluid levels for CEA were compared with the cytological and immunocytochemical findings in 30 cases. Mucin stains performed on the cell blocks were also compared with the immunoperoxidase findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":75950,"journal":{"name":"Investigative & cell pathology","volume":"3 3","pages":"251-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CEA, ZGM and EMA localization in cells of pleural and peritoneal effusion: a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"M J O'Brien,&nbsp;S E Kirkham,&nbsp;B Burke,&nbsp;M Ormerod,&nbsp;C A Saravis,&nbsp;L S Gottlieb,&nbsp;A M Neville,&nbsp;N Zamcheck\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the zinc glycinate marker (ZGM) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) have been described as epithelial or tumour markers of varying specificity. These antigens were studied by immunoperoxidase localization in selected cell blocks of 62 pleural or peritoneal effusions and compared to cytological findings and review of the clinical records. By cytological criteria, 25 of the cell blocks were positive for malignancy, 30 negative, and 7 inconclusive. CEA, ZGM, and EMA by immunoperoxidase staining were localized on the cell surface and often in the cytoplasm of malignant cells, in 11/25 (44 per cent), 17/25 (68 per cent) and 22/25 (88 per cent) of the positive cell blocks respectively. Ten (40 per cent) of these cases were positive for all three antigens, 7 (28 per cent) for two, and 6 (24 per cent) for one. Of the 7 cases which were inconclusive on routine cytological reporting, 5 were positive for at least one marker. In 3 of the 5 a diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed, and in the other two was strongly suspected as malignant on clinical grounds. Macrophages were sometimes positive for one or more markers (but showed cytoplasmic staining only) and mesothelial cells in some cases stained positively for EMA but were always negative for CEA and ZGM. Localization of the 3 antigens in cells of malignant effusions was compared with their localization in the primary tumours in 9 cases. Localization corresponded for CEA in 7 of 9 cases, for EMA in 8 of 8 an for ZGM in only 2 of 9. Effusion fluid levels for CEA were compared with the cytological and immunocytochemical findings in 30 cases. Mucin stains performed on the cell blocks were also compared with the immunoperoxidase findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative & cell pathology\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"251-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative & cell pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative & cell pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌胚抗原(CEA)、甘氨酸锌标记物(ZGM)和上皮膜抗原(EMA)已被描述为具有不同特异性的上皮或肿瘤标记物。通过免疫过氧化物酶在62例胸膜或腹膜积液的选定细胞块中定位研究了这些抗原,并与细胞学结果和临床记录进行了比较。根据细胞学标准,25个细胞块为恶性肿瘤阳性,30个为阴性,7个不确定。免疫过氧化物酶染色CEA、ZGM和EMA定位于细胞表面,常位于恶性细胞的细胞质中,分别占阳性细胞块的11/25(44%)、17/25(68%)和22/25(88%)。这些病例中有10例(40%)对所有三种抗原都呈阳性,7例(28%)对两种抗原呈阳性,6例(24%)对一种抗原呈阳性。在常规细胞学报告不确定的7例中,5例至少有一种标志物呈阳性。5例中有3例确诊为恶性肿瘤,另外2例根据临床理由强烈怀疑为恶性肿瘤。巨噬细胞有时一种或多种标记物呈阳性(但仅显示细胞质染色),间皮细胞在某些情况下呈EMA阳性,但CEA和ZGM总是阴性。将3种抗原在9例恶性肿瘤积液细胞中的定位与它们在原发肿瘤中的定位进行比较。9例中有7例为CEA, 8例为EMA, 9例中只有2例为ZGM。将30例CEA的积液水平与细胞学和免疫细胞化学结果进行比较。在细胞块上进行粘蛋白染色也与免疫过氧化物酶结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CEA, ZGM and EMA localization in cells of pleural and peritoneal effusion: a preliminary study.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the zinc glycinate marker (ZGM) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) have been described as epithelial or tumour markers of varying specificity. These antigens were studied by immunoperoxidase localization in selected cell blocks of 62 pleural or peritoneal effusions and compared to cytological findings and review of the clinical records. By cytological criteria, 25 of the cell blocks were positive for malignancy, 30 negative, and 7 inconclusive. CEA, ZGM, and EMA by immunoperoxidase staining were localized on the cell surface and often in the cytoplasm of malignant cells, in 11/25 (44 per cent), 17/25 (68 per cent) and 22/25 (88 per cent) of the positive cell blocks respectively. Ten (40 per cent) of these cases were positive for all three antigens, 7 (28 per cent) for two, and 6 (24 per cent) for one. Of the 7 cases which were inconclusive on routine cytological reporting, 5 were positive for at least one marker. In 3 of the 5 a diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed, and in the other two was strongly suspected as malignant on clinical grounds. Macrophages were sometimes positive for one or more markers (but showed cytoplasmic staining only) and mesothelial cells in some cases stained positively for EMA but were always negative for CEA and ZGM. Localization of the 3 antigens in cells of malignant effusions was compared with their localization in the primary tumours in 9 cases. Localization corresponded for CEA in 7 of 9 cases, for EMA in 8 of 8 an for ZGM in only 2 of 9. Effusion fluid levels for CEA were compared with the cytological and immunocytochemical findings in 30 cases. Mucin stains performed on the cell blocks were also compared with the immunoperoxidase findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信