处方精神活性药物高频消费者的特征。

Chemical dependencies Pub Date : 1980-01-01
C D Chambers, O Z White
{"title":"处方精神活性药物高频消费者的特征。","authors":"C D Chambers,&nbsp;O Z White","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two cohorts of white middle-class housewives who reported themselves as high-frequency consumers of prescription sedatives, tranquilizers, and stimulants have been studied and their characteristics have been reported. One group of these women are residents of a Midwestern state, and the other in a Southern state. These women can best be described as follows: Most reported their primary physician as being a general practitioner (60%), and most reported they had consulted two or more separate physicians during the last year (78%). More than a third (36%) had seen at least three different physicians. Interestingly, while most of these women were consulting general practitioners and/or internists, almost a third were presenting them with general psychological complaints. The self-reported high-frequency users most frequently used the relaxants/minor tranquilizers (64%), followed by sedatives (41%), stimulants (31%), and major tranquilizers (7%). Almost half of all these high-frequency medicine consumers were also regular drinkers (47%), and some 13 to 17% could be considered as heavy drinkers. The majority of the relaxant/minor tranquilizer users had been taking the medications daily or several times a week for at least six months. Less than half of these users, however, felt their \"condition\" had gotten \"better.\" The majority of the sedative users had also been taking the medications daily or several times a week for at least six months. Less than a third of these users felt the condition that precipitated the prescription had improved during this period of use. Of major importance, only a minority of these long-term high-frequency users of sedatives and relaxants/minor tranquilizers believe these drugs to be habit-forming or to have any potential for physical or psychological harm. Although the stimulant-users were also found to be high-frequency consumers, stimulant-users were found to have been using these drugs for a shorter period of time. There also appears to be more confusion about the potential for physical and/or psychological damage in the long-term use of stimulants among those women than among the users of sedatives and/or minor tranquilizers. It is significant to note that stimulant-users felt that they had gotten \"better\" more than those who had used sedatives and/or tranquilizers. These two interview studies among housewives tend to confirm several of our earlier survey findings among people who use these drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79207,"journal":{"name":"Chemical dependencies","volume":"4 1-2","pages":"33-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of high-frequency consumers of prescription psychoactive drugs.\",\"authors\":\"C D Chambers,&nbsp;O Z White\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two cohorts of white middle-class housewives who reported themselves as high-frequency consumers of prescription sedatives, tranquilizers, and stimulants have been studied and their characteristics have been reported. One group of these women are residents of a Midwestern state, and the other in a Southern state. These women can best be described as follows: Most reported their primary physician as being a general practitioner (60%), and most reported they had consulted two or more separate physicians during the last year (78%). More than a third (36%) had seen at least three different physicians. Interestingly, while most of these women were consulting general practitioners and/or internists, almost a third were presenting them with general psychological complaints. The self-reported high-frequency users most frequently used the relaxants/minor tranquilizers (64%), followed by sedatives (41%), stimulants (31%), and major tranquilizers (7%). Almost half of all these high-frequency medicine consumers were also regular drinkers (47%), and some 13 to 17% could be considered as heavy drinkers. The majority of the relaxant/minor tranquilizer users had been taking the medications daily or several times a week for at least six months. Less than half of these users, however, felt their \\\"condition\\\" had gotten \\\"better.\\\" The majority of the sedative users had also been taking the medications daily or several times a week for at least six months. Less than a third of these users felt the condition that precipitated the prescription had improved during this period of use. Of major importance, only a minority of these long-term high-frequency users of sedatives and relaxants/minor tranquilizers believe these drugs to be habit-forming or to have any potential for physical or psychological harm. Although the stimulant-users were also found to be high-frequency consumers, stimulant-users were found to have been using these drugs for a shorter period of time. There also appears to be more confusion about the potential for physical and/or psychological damage in the long-term use of stimulants among those women than among the users of sedatives and/or minor tranquilizers. It is significant to note that stimulant-users felt that they had gotten \\\"better\\\" more than those who had used sedatives and/or tranquilizers. These two interview studies among housewives tend to confirm several of our earlier survey findings among people who use these drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical dependencies\",\"volume\":\"4 1-2\",\"pages\":\"33-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical dependencies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical dependencies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员研究了两组白人中产阶级家庭主妇,她们经常使用处方镇静剂、镇静剂和兴奋剂,并报告了她们的特点。其中一组是中西部一个州的居民,另一组是南部一个州的居民。这些妇女可以最好地描述如下:大多数人报告他们的主治医生是全科医生(60%),大多数人报告他们在去年咨询了两个或两个以上的医生(78%)。超过三分之一(36%)的人至少看过三个不同的医生。有趣的是,虽然这些女性中的大多数都在咨询全科医生和/或内科医生,但几乎三分之一的人向她们提出了一般的心理问题。自我报告的高频使用者最常使用的是松弛剂/轻度镇静剂(64%),其次是镇静剂(41%)、兴奋剂(31%)和重度镇静剂(7%)。几乎一半的高频药物消费者也是经常饮酒者(47%),大约13%到17%的人可以被认为是重度饮酒者。大多数使用松弛剂/轻微镇静剂的人每天或每周服用几次,至少持续6个月。然而,不到一半的用户觉得他们的“状况”有所好转。大多数镇静剂使用者每天或每周服用几次,至少持续了六个月。这些使用者中不到三分之一的人认为,在使用期间,沉淀处方的条件有所改善。重要的是,在这些长期频繁使用镇静剂和松弛剂/少量镇静剂的人中,只有少数人认为这些药物会使人养成习惯,或有可能对身体或心理造成伤害。虽然兴奋剂使用者也被发现是高频使用者,但兴奋剂使用者使用这些药物的时间较短。对于这些妇女长期使用兴奋剂可能造成的身体和/或心理伤害,似乎也比使用镇静剂和/或少量镇静剂的妇女更令人困惑。值得注意的是,兴奋剂使用者比那些使用镇静剂和/或镇静剂的人更能感觉到他们变得“更好”。这两项对家庭主妇的访谈研究倾向于证实我们之前对使用这些药物的人的调查结果。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of high-frequency consumers of prescription psychoactive drugs.

Two cohorts of white middle-class housewives who reported themselves as high-frequency consumers of prescription sedatives, tranquilizers, and stimulants have been studied and their characteristics have been reported. One group of these women are residents of a Midwestern state, and the other in a Southern state. These women can best be described as follows: Most reported their primary physician as being a general practitioner (60%), and most reported they had consulted two or more separate physicians during the last year (78%). More than a third (36%) had seen at least three different physicians. Interestingly, while most of these women were consulting general practitioners and/or internists, almost a third were presenting them with general psychological complaints. The self-reported high-frequency users most frequently used the relaxants/minor tranquilizers (64%), followed by sedatives (41%), stimulants (31%), and major tranquilizers (7%). Almost half of all these high-frequency medicine consumers were also regular drinkers (47%), and some 13 to 17% could be considered as heavy drinkers. The majority of the relaxant/minor tranquilizer users had been taking the medications daily or several times a week for at least six months. Less than half of these users, however, felt their "condition" had gotten "better." The majority of the sedative users had also been taking the medications daily or several times a week for at least six months. Less than a third of these users felt the condition that precipitated the prescription had improved during this period of use. Of major importance, only a minority of these long-term high-frequency users of sedatives and relaxants/minor tranquilizers believe these drugs to be habit-forming or to have any potential for physical or psychological harm. Although the stimulant-users were also found to be high-frequency consumers, stimulant-users were found to have been using these drugs for a shorter period of time. There also appears to be more confusion about the potential for physical and/or psychological damage in the long-term use of stimulants among those women than among the users of sedatives and/or minor tranquilizers. It is significant to note that stimulant-users felt that they had gotten "better" more than those who had used sedatives and/or tranquilizers. These two interview studies among housewives tend to confirm several of our earlier survey findings among people who use these drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信