利用低场核磁共振定量表征页岩中甲烷吸附

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Kaishuo Yang , Paul R.J. Conolly , Libin Liu , Xiaoxian Yang , Neil Robinson , Ming Li , Mohamed Mahmoud , Ammar El-Husseiny , Michael Verrall , Eric F. May , Michael L. Johns
{"title":"利用低场核磁共振定量表征页岩中甲烷吸附","authors":"Kaishuo Yang ,&nbsp;Paul R.J. Conolly ,&nbsp;Libin Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoxian Yang ,&nbsp;Neil Robinson ,&nbsp;Ming Li ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud ,&nbsp;Ammar El-Husseiny ,&nbsp;Michael Verrall ,&nbsp;Eric F. May ,&nbsp;Michael L. Johns","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Quantification of methane content in shales is a critical parameter for estimation of their potential gas production capacity. Traditional gravimetric methods for estimation of this quantity are sensitive only to adsorbed methane and are difficult to apply either to intact shale rock cores or via field measurements. Here non-invasive low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) is applied to quantify excess methane </span>adsorption capacity in two intact shale rock plugs at pressures up to 150 bar; validation is provided against destructive gravimetric methods performed on fragments from the same shale rock plugs. The resultant NMR </span>transverse relaxation time (</span><em>T</em><sub>2</sub>) distributions contain three distinct peaks (referred to as peaks P1 – P3) which are allocated to adsorbed methane in organic pores, methane constrained to inorganic pores and bulk methane located predominately in fractures, respectively. The area of peak P1 is observed to increase with pressure up to 100 bar, after which it reaches a plateau, whilst the area of peaks P2 and P3 both increase linearly with pressure up to 150 bar. The most accurate estimate of excess methane adsorption capacity is obtained via a combination of an overall system mass balance and the methane located in inorganic pores and fractures (peaks P2 and P3, respectively), where excellent agreement is produced with corresponding gravimetric measurements for both shale samples studied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption in shale using low-field NMR\",\"authors\":\"Kaishuo Yang ,&nbsp;Paul R.J. Conolly ,&nbsp;Libin Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoxian Yang ,&nbsp;Neil Robinson ,&nbsp;Ming Li ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud ,&nbsp;Ammar El-Husseiny ,&nbsp;Michael Verrall ,&nbsp;Eric F. May ,&nbsp;Michael L. Johns\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Quantification of methane content in shales is a critical parameter for estimation of their potential gas production capacity. Traditional gravimetric methods for estimation of this quantity are sensitive only to adsorbed methane and are difficult to apply either to intact shale rock cores or via field measurements. Here non-invasive low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) is applied to quantify excess methane </span>adsorption capacity in two intact shale rock plugs at pressures up to 150 bar; validation is provided against destructive gravimetric methods performed on fragments from the same shale rock plugs. The resultant NMR </span>transverse relaxation time (</span><em>T</em><sub>2</sub>) distributions contain three distinct peaks (referred to as peaks P1 – P3) which are allocated to adsorbed methane in organic pores, methane constrained to inorganic pores and bulk methane located predominately in fractures, respectively. The area of peak P1 is observed to increase with pressure up to 100 bar, after which it reaches a plateau, whilst the area of peaks P2 and P3 both increase linearly with pressure up to 150 bar. The most accurate estimate of excess methane adsorption capacity is obtained via a combination of an overall system mass balance and the methane located in inorganic pores and fractures (peaks P2 and P3, respectively), where excellent agreement is produced with corresponding gravimetric measurements for both shale samples studied.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004334\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

页岩中甲烷含量的量化是估算其潜在产气能力的关键参数。传统的重量测量方法仅对吸附甲烷敏感,难以应用于完整的页岩岩心或通过现场测量。在这里,应用非侵入性低场核磁共振(LF-NMR)来量化两个完整页岩塞在高达150 bar压力下的多余甲烷吸附能力;通过对同一页岩岩塞碎片的破坏性重力法进行验证。得到的核磁共振横向弛豫时间(T2)分布有三个不同的峰(P1 - P3),分别分配给有机孔隙中的吸附甲烷、无机孔隙中的约束甲烷和主要位于裂缝中的大块甲烷。观察到P1峰的面积随着压力达到100 bar而增加,之后它达到一个平台,而P2峰和P3峰的面积都随着压力达到150 bar而线性增加。通过综合整体系统质量平衡和位于无机孔隙和裂缝中的甲烷(分别为峰P2和峰P3),可以获得对过量甲烷吸附能力的最准确估计,这与所研究的两种页岩样品的相应重量测量结果非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption in shale using low-field NMR

Quantification of methane content in shales is a critical parameter for estimation of their potential gas production capacity. Traditional gravimetric methods for estimation of this quantity are sensitive only to adsorbed methane and are difficult to apply either to intact shale rock cores or via field measurements. Here non-invasive low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) is applied to quantify excess methane adsorption capacity in two intact shale rock plugs at pressures up to 150 bar; validation is provided against destructive gravimetric methods performed on fragments from the same shale rock plugs. The resultant NMR transverse relaxation time (T2) distributions contain three distinct peaks (referred to as peaks P1 – P3) which are allocated to adsorbed methane in organic pores, methane constrained to inorganic pores and bulk methane located predominately in fractures, respectively. The area of peak P1 is observed to increase with pressure up to 100 bar, after which it reaches a plateau, whilst the area of peaks P2 and P3 both increase linearly with pressure up to 150 bar. The most accurate estimate of excess methane adsorption capacity is obtained via a combination of an overall system mass balance and the methane located in inorganic pores and fractures (peaks P2 and P3, respectively), where excellent agreement is produced with corresponding gravimetric measurements for both shale samples studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信