{"title":"对“有机儿童的本德格式塔:临床判断的准确性”的程序批判。","authors":"J B Mordock","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1969.10380176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary It is suggested that conclusions from a study by Wagner and Murray be tempered with respect to several procedural flaws: (a) their failure to include an appropriate control group for comparison with brain-injured Ss; and (b) failure to adequately describe the organic group. The results, therefore, cannot be taken as evidence for or against the use of the Bender Gestalt Test in differential diagnosis of brain-impaired children.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"33 6","pages":"489-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1969-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1969.10380176","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A procedural critique of \\\"Bender Gestalts of organic children: accuracy of clinical judgment\\\".\",\"authors\":\"J B Mordock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0091651X.1969.10380176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary It is suggested that conclusions from a study by Wagner and Murray be tempered with respect to several procedural flaws: (a) their failure to include an appropriate control group for comparison with brain-injured Ss; and (b) failure to adequately describe the organic group. The results, therefore, cannot be taken as evidence for or against the use of the Bender Gestalt Test in differential diagnosis of brain-impaired children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"489-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1969-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1969.10380176\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1969.10380176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1969.10380176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A procedural critique of "Bender Gestalts of organic children: accuracy of clinical judgment".
Summary It is suggested that conclusions from a study by Wagner and Murray be tempered with respect to several procedural flaws: (a) their failure to include an appropriate control group for comparison with brain-injured Ss; and (b) failure to adequately describe the organic group. The results, therefore, cannot be taken as evidence for or against the use of the Bender Gestalt Test in differential diagnosis of brain-impaired children.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
