{"title":"CAT和CAT- h的投射性幻想。","authors":"C Neuringer, R C Livesay","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The CAT and CAT-H were compared for amounts of evoked projective fantasy in children. The two tests were given to children of high, moderate and low anxiety. The protocols were scored for five indices of productivity. They were (1) number of words, (2) number of emotional words, (3) number of expressed negative emotions, (4) Adaptive Mechanisms and (5) Transcendence Index. The results indicated that there is little to choose between the two tests in terms of stimulating fantasy production. Neither was there a test form x anxiety level interaction found.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 6","pages":"487-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380292","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Projective fantasy on the CAT and CAT-H.\",\"authors\":\"C Neuringer, R C Livesay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The CAT and CAT-H were compared for amounts of evoked projective fantasy in children. The two tests were given to children of high, moderate and low anxiety. The protocols were scored for five indices of productivity. They were (1) number of words, (2) number of emotional words, (3) number of expressed negative emotions, (4) Adaptive Mechanisms and (5) Transcendence Index. The results indicated that there is little to choose between the two tests in terms of stimulating fantasy production. Neither was there a test form x anxiety level interaction found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"487-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380292\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary The CAT and CAT-H were compared for amounts of evoked projective fantasy in children. The two tests were given to children of high, moderate and low anxiety. The protocols were scored for five indices of productivity. They were (1) number of words, (2) number of emotional words, (3) number of expressed negative emotions, (4) Adaptive Mechanisms and (5) Transcendence Index. The results indicated that there is little to choose between the two tests in terms of stimulating fantasy production. Neither was there a test form x anxiety level interaction found.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
