计算机辅助眼科检查。3.主观折射的生理指标。

G Hung, E Marg
{"title":"计算机辅助眼科检查。3.主观折射的生理指标。","authors":"G Hung, E Marg","doi":"10.1097/00006324-197312000-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In a computerized eye examination, there are times when the examiner is not at the patient's side. Hence, it was anticipated that non‐verbal indicators (i.e., EKG, blink, GSR) might be used to aid the computer in converging upon the proper lens correction more expediently. During actual clinical examinations at the University of California, Berkeley, EKG, blink, GSR, arm acceleration, and respiration measurements were made on 38 patients to determine if there is any correlation between any of the above and the patient's uncertainty about his/her response as indicated by reaction time and tone of voice. It was found that the EKG (four patients) and respiratory rate (four patients) were usually steady and rather insensitive to uncertainty of response. For three out of ten patients tested in the blink response, a rough correlation was found. The other seven patients produced non‐correlating responses. For twelve patients tested, the GSR was found to be an unreliable indicator of uncertainty. Further, eight patients exhibited little or no arm acceleration movements during the attentive portions of the eye examinations.","PeriodicalId":78011,"journal":{"name":"American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry","volume":"50 12","pages":"968-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1973-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00006324-197312000-00006","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-assisted eye examination. 3. Physiological indices for subjective refraction.\",\"authors\":\"G Hung, E Marg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00006324-197312000-00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In a computerized eye examination, there are times when the examiner is not at the patient's side. Hence, it was anticipated that non‐verbal indicators (i.e., EKG, blink, GSR) might be used to aid the computer in converging upon the proper lens correction more expediently. During actual clinical examinations at the University of California, Berkeley, EKG, blink, GSR, arm acceleration, and respiration measurements were made on 38 patients to determine if there is any correlation between any of the above and the patient's uncertainty about his/her response as indicated by reaction time and tone of voice. It was found that the EKG (four patients) and respiratory rate (four patients) were usually steady and rather insensitive to uncertainty of response. For three out of ten patients tested in the blink response, a rough correlation was found. The other seven patients produced non‐correlating responses. For twelve patients tested, the GSR was found to be an unreliable indicator of uncertainty. Further, eight patients exhibited little or no arm acceleration movements during the attentive portions of the eye examinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"50 12\",\"pages\":\"968-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1973-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00006324-197312000-00006\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197312000-00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197312000-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computer-assisted eye examination. 3. Physiological indices for subjective refraction.
ABSTRACT In a computerized eye examination, there are times when the examiner is not at the patient's side. Hence, it was anticipated that non‐verbal indicators (i.e., EKG, blink, GSR) might be used to aid the computer in converging upon the proper lens correction more expediently. During actual clinical examinations at the University of California, Berkeley, EKG, blink, GSR, arm acceleration, and respiration measurements were made on 38 patients to determine if there is any correlation between any of the above and the patient's uncertainty about his/her response as indicated by reaction time and tone of voice. It was found that the EKG (four patients) and respiratory rate (four patients) were usually steady and rather insensitive to uncertainty of response. For three out of ten patients tested in the blink response, a rough correlation was found. The other seven patients produced non‐correlating responses. For twelve patients tested, the GSR was found to be an unreliable indicator of uncertainty. Further, eight patients exhibited little or no arm acceleration movements during the attentive portions of the eye examinations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信