常规超声筛查。

A Hawkswell
{"title":"常规超声筛查。","authors":"A Hawkswell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analysis is made from data obtained after screening 1,000 measurable cases attending the eye department of a general hospital consecutively. Some 9 per cent of these patients were found to have a significant degree of aniseikonia. Symptoms of aniseikonia were found to be less common than suggested in the literature; these are limited to 3.6 per cent of the patients surveyed and are absent where the degree of aniseikonia is less than 2 per cent. It is concluded that since the number of patients having a significant degree of aniseikonia is as great as 9 per cent and that the empirical estimation of aniseikonia is unreliable, it is desirable to include eikonometry into the clinical refraction routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":76613,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of physiological optics","volume":"29 3","pages":"126-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine aniseikonic screening.\",\"authors\":\"A Hawkswell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Analysis is made from data obtained after screening 1,000 measurable cases attending the eye department of a general hospital consecutively. Some 9 per cent of these patients were found to have a significant degree of aniseikonia. Symptoms of aniseikonia were found to be less common than suggested in the literature; these are limited to 3.6 per cent of the patients surveyed and are absent where the degree of aniseikonia is less than 2 per cent. It is concluded that since the number of patients having a significant degree of aniseikonia is as great as 9 per cent and that the empirical estimation of aniseikonia is unreliable, it is desirable to include eikonometry into the clinical refraction routine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of physiological optics\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"126-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1974-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of physiological optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of physiological optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对某综合医院眼科连续筛查1000例可测量病例的数据进行分析。这些患者中约有9%被发现有明显程度的异裂。研究发现,异角性贫血的症状并不像文献中提到的那么常见;这些被限制在被调查患者的3.6%,并且在斜视程度小于2%的情况下缺席。结论是,由于具有明显程度的斜视的患者数量高达9%,并且对斜视的经验估计是不可靠的,因此希望将斜视测量纳入临床屈光常规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine aniseikonic screening.

Analysis is made from data obtained after screening 1,000 measurable cases attending the eye department of a general hospital consecutively. Some 9 per cent of these patients were found to have a significant degree of aniseikonia. Symptoms of aniseikonia were found to be less common than suggested in the literature; these are limited to 3.6 per cent of the patients surveyed and are absent where the degree of aniseikonia is less than 2 per cent. It is concluded that since the number of patients having a significant degree of aniseikonia is as great as 9 per cent and that the empirical estimation of aniseikonia is unreliable, it is desirable to include eikonometry into the clinical refraction routine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信