投射性识别:一个负担过重的概念。

N M Kulish
{"title":"投射性识别:一个负担过重的概念。","authors":"N M Kulish","doi":"10.1080/02668738500700181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term projective identification has been broadened from its original meaning as set forth by Melanie Klein to include the interpersonal sphere. A review of the psychoanalytic literature on projective identification shows varying uses, definitional problems, and conceptual confusion and raises serious questions regarding the possibility of integrating intrapersonal and interpersonal models of the mind. Clinical material is presented to show that phenomena commonly described as projective identification are variable, complex patterns of behavior that are not well understood. The author concludes that the major definitional and conceptual difficulties with the term justify that its usage be limited. At the same time, the powerful clinical phenomena--the transference-countertransference interactions--described as projective identification cannot be ignored.</p>","PeriodicalId":75941,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychoanalytic psychotherapy","volume":"11 ","pages":"79-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02668738500700181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Projective identification: a concept overburdened.\",\"authors\":\"N M Kulish\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02668738500700181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The term projective identification has been broadened from its original meaning as set forth by Melanie Klein to include the interpersonal sphere. A review of the psychoanalytic literature on projective identification shows varying uses, definitional problems, and conceptual confusion and raises serious questions regarding the possibility of integrating intrapersonal and interpersonal models of the mind. Clinical material is presented to show that phenomena commonly described as projective identification are variable, complex patterns of behavior that are not well understood. The author concludes that the major definitional and conceptual difficulties with the term justify that its usage be limited. At the same time, the powerful clinical phenomena--the transference-countertransference interactions--described as projective identification cannot be ignored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychoanalytic psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"79-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02668738500700181\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychoanalytic psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02668738500700181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychoanalytic psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02668738500700181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“投射性认同”一词已从梅勒妮·克莱因(Melanie Klein)提出的最初含义扩大到包括人际领域。对投射性认同的精神分析文献的回顾显示了投射性认同的不同用途、定义问题和概念混乱,并提出了关于整合心理的内部和人际模型的可能性的严肃问题。临床资料显示,通常被描述为投射识别的现象是可变的,复杂的行为模式,不被很好地理解。作者的结论是,该术语在定义和概念上的主要困难证明它的使用是有限的。与此同时,被描述为投射性认同的强大的临床现象——移情-反移情相互作用——也不容忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Projective identification: a concept overburdened.

The term projective identification has been broadened from its original meaning as set forth by Melanie Klein to include the interpersonal sphere. A review of the psychoanalytic literature on projective identification shows varying uses, definitional problems, and conceptual confusion and raises serious questions regarding the possibility of integrating intrapersonal and interpersonal models of the mind. Clinical material is presented to show that phenomena commonly described as projective identification are variable, complex patterns of behavior that are not well understood. The author concludes that the major definitional and conceptual difficulties with the term justify that its usage be limited. At the same time, the powerful clinical phenomena--the transference-countertransference interactions--described as projective identification cannot be ignored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信