异位妊娠的多国病例对照研究。世界卫生组织人类生殖研究、发展和研究培训特别方案:用于调节生育的宫内节育器工作队。

Clinical reproduction and fertility Pub Date : 1985-06-01
{"title":"异位妊娠的多国病例对照研究。世界卫生组织人类生殖研究、发展和研究培训特别方案:用于调节生育的宫内节育器工作队。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a multinational case-control study of ectopic pregnancy in which 1108 ectopic cases were matched by age, parity and marital status with an equal number of pregnant and non-pregnant controls. When cases were compared to pregnant controls there was an increased relative risk (RR) of ectopic pregnancy associated with the use of an intrauterine device (IUD; RR = 6.4) and sterilisation (RR = 10.9) at time of conception, but there was no increased risk associated with oral contraception or other reversible methods. There was an excess of ovarian pregnancies among cases wearing an IUD, and more cases than controls using an IUD had evidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). This suggests that the IUD increases the risk of ectopic gestation possibly by providing greater protection against intrauterine (rather than extrauterine) pregnancy, and by predisposing women to PID and tubal damage. When cases were compared to non-pregnant controls the relative risk of ectopic pregnancy was reduced with all methods, but this protective effect was less marked with the IUD (RR = 0.5) than with the pill (RR = 0.1), other interval methods (RR = 0.2) or sterilisation (RR = 0.2). IUD use prior to conception did not affect the risk of ectopic gestation (RR = 0.7). A past history of PID or sexually transmitted disease (STD) was associated with an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy compared to pregnant (RR = 2.8) and non-pregnant (RR = 2.0) controls. This risk may be higher with multiple episodes of previous PID, but the results were not consistent. Prior PID in the presence of an IUD did not increase the risk over and above that associated with a high risk of recurrence (RR = 7.0 for pregnant and RR = 9.3 for non-pregnant controls). Induced abortion did not significantly affect the risk of ectopic gestation, but spontaneous abortion was associated with an increased risk compared to non-pregnant controls. This finding may have been due to selection bias. Cigarette smoking was associated with an increased relative risk of 3.1 for pregnant and 1.8 for non-pregnant controls. This was not consistent in all comparison groups and may have resulted from confounding, but requires further investigation. We did not observe a significant risk of ectopic pregnancy following gynaecological surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10478,"journal":{"name":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","volume":"3 2","pages":"131-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multinational case-control study of ectopic pregnancy. The World Health Organization's Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction: Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility Regulation.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We conducted a multinational case-control study of ectopic pregnancy in which 1108 ectopic cases were matched by age, parity and marital status with an equal number of pregnant and non-pregnant controls. When cases were compared to pregnant controls there was an increased relative risk (RR) of ectopic pregnancy associated with the use of an intrauterine device (IUD; RR = 6.4) and sterilisation (RR = 10.9) at time of conception, but there was no increased risk associated with oral contraception or other reversible methods. There was an excess of ovarian pregnancies among cases wearing an IUD, and more cases than controls using an IUD had evidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). This suggests that the IUD increases the risk of ectopic gestation possibly by providing greater protection against intrauterine (rather than extrauterine) pregnancy, and by predisposing women to PID and tubal damage. When cases were compared to non-pregnant controls the relative risk of ectopic pregnancy was reduced with all methods, but this protective effect was less marked with the IUD (RR = 0.5) than with the pill (RR = 0.1), other interval methods (RR = 0.2) or sterilisation (RR = 0.2). IUD use prior to conception did not affect the risk of ectopic gestation (RR = 0.7). A past history of PID or sexually transmitted disease (STD) was associated with an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy compared to pregnant (RR = 2.8) and non-pregnant (RR = 2.0) controls. This risk may be higher with multiple episodes of previous PID, but the results were not consistent. Prior PID in the presence of an IUD did not increase the risk over and above that associated with a high risk of recurrence (RR = 7.0 for pregnant and RR = 9.3 for non-pregnant controls). Induced abortion did not significantly affect the risk of ectopic gestation, but spontaneous abortion was associated with an increased risk compared to non-pregnant controls. This finding may have been due to selection bias. Cigarette smoking was associated with an increased relative risk of 3.1 for pregnant and 1.8 for non-pregnant controls. This was not consistent in all comparison groups and may have resulted from confounding, but requires further investigation. We did not observe a significant risk of ectopic pregnancy following gynaecological surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical reproduction and fertility\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"131-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical reproduction and fertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了一项异位妊娠的跨国病例对照研究,其中1108例异位病例按年龄、胎次和婚姻状况进行匹配,并有相同数量的怀孕和未怀孕对照。当病例与妊娠对照比较时,宫内节育器(IUD)的使用增加了异位妊娠的相对风险(RR);RR = 6.4)和绝育(RR = 10.9),但口服避孕药或其他可逆方法没有增加风险。在佩戴宫内节育器的病例中有卵巢妊娠的过量,并且使用宫内节育器的病例比对照组有更多的盆腔炎(PID)的证据。这表明宫内节育器增加了异位妊娠的风险,可能是由于它对宫内妊娠(而不是宫外妊娠)提供了更大的保护,并使妇女易患PID和输卵管损伤。当病例与未怀孕对照组比较时,所有方法都降低了异位妊娠的相对风险,但宫内节育器(RR = 0.5)的保护作用低于避孕药(RR = 0.1)、其他间隔方法(RR = 0.2)或绝育(RR = 0.2)。受孕前使用宫内节育器不影响异位妊娠的风险(RR = 0.7)。与妊娠对照组(RR = 2.8)和非妊娠对照组(RR = 2.0)相比,既往有PID或性传播疾病(STD)病史与异位妊娠风险增加相关。先前多次发作的PID的风险可能更高,但结果并不一致。先前存在宫内节育器的PID并未增加与复发高风险相关的风险(妊娠对照RR = 7.0,非妊娠对照RR = 9.3)。人工流产对异位妊娠的风险没有显著影响,但与未怀孕的对照组相比,自然流产的风险增加。这一发现可能是由于选择偏差。吸烟与孕妇和非孕妇的相对风险增加有关,前者为3.1,后者为1.8。这在所有的对照组中并不一致,可能是由混淆引起的,但需要进一步的调查。我们没有观察到妇科手术后异位妊娠的显著风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multinational case-control study of ectopic pregnancy. The World Health Organization's Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction: Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility Regulation.

We conducted a multinational case-control study of ectopic pregnancy in which 1108 ectopic cases were matched by age, parity and marital status with an equal number of pregnant and non-pregnant controls. When cases were compared to pregnant controls there was an increased relative risk (RR) of ectopic pregnancy associated with the use of an intrauterine device (IUD; RR = 6.4) and sterilisation (RR = 10.9) at time of conception, but there was no increased risk associated with oral contraception or other reversible methods. There was an excess of ovarian pregnancies among cases wearing an IUD, and more cases than controls using an IUD had evidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). This suggests that the IUD increases the risk of ectopic gestation possibly by providing greater protection against intrauterine (rather than extrauterine) pregnancy, and by predisposing women to PID and tubal damage. When cases were compared to non-pregnant controls the relative risk of ectopic pregnancy was reduced with all methods, but this protective effect was less marked with the IUD (RR = 0.5) than with the pill (RR = 0.1), other interval methods (RR = 0.2) or sterilisation (RR = 0.2). IUD use prior to conception did not affect the risk of ectopic gestation (RR = 0.7). A past history of PID or sexually transmitted disease (STD) was associated with an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy compared to pregnant (RR = 2.8) and non-pregnant (RR = 2.0) controls. This risk may be higher with multiple episodes of previous PID, but the results were not consistent. Prior PID in the presence of an IUD did not increase the risk over and above that associated with a high risk of recurrence (RR = 7.0 for pregnant and RR = 9.3 for non-pregnant controls). Induced abortion did not significantly affect the risk of ectopic gestation, but spontaneous abortion was associated with an increased risk compared to non-pregnant controls. This finding may have been due to selection bias. Cigarette smoking was associated with an increased relative risk of 3.1 for pregnant and 1.8 for non-pregnant controls. This was not consistent in all comparison groups and may have resulted from confounding, but requires further investigation. We did not observe a significant risk of ectopic pregnancy following gynaecological surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信