办公室足部手术的基本原理。

Clinics in podiatry Pub Date : 1985-07-01
W A Wood
{"title":"办公室足部手术的基本原理。","authors":"W A Wood","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is clear from this study that the majority of foot surgical cases being done in the United States may be performed in an office-based surgical setting when individual case considerations are made on a case-by-case basis. This entire study reflects the importance of physician preference relative to selecting a surgical environment for management of disorders and surgery of the foot. In some areas, a strong consensus of opinion existed concerning one surgical location or the other, but the overwhelming majority of responses indicated a case-by-case evaluation prior to physician selection of the surgical environment. The Delphi study was well validated by the survey of Alabama podiatrists in this regard. Traditionally, within the United States, the physician has acted as an agent to the patient and as an allocator of health care resources. Perhaps current concepts regarding patient hospitalization for certain surgical procedures would change if the physician were motivated (either intellectually or financially) toward office-based surgery on a individual case basis. Perhaps, in selected elective surgical procedures, patients could be sufficiently informed so that they could voice an opinion or preference relative to selection of the surgical environment. Additional research in this area is necessary. Expanded insight into established patterns of patient hospitalization practices and general anesthesia usage on these hospitalized patients may also be in order. Realizing full well the role of independent physician judgment in these matters, it may be that selection of general anesthesia and hospitalization for some elective surgery procedures reflects the physician's training rather than his appreciation of alternate routes for rendering reasonable and responsible care.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"2 3","pages":"413-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationale for office-based foot surgery.\",\"authors\":\"W A Wood\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is clear from this study that the majority of foot surgical cases being done in the United States may be performed in an office-based surgical setting when individual case considerations are made on a case-by-case basis. This entire study reflects the importance of physician preference relative to selecting a surgical environment for management of disorders and surgery of the foot. In some areas, a strong consensus of opinion existed concerning one surgical location or the other, but the overwhelming majority of responses indicated a case-by-case evaluation prior to physician selection of the surgical environment. The Delphi study was well validated by the survey of Alabama podiatrists in this regard. Traditionally, within the United States, the physician has acted as an agent to the patient and as an allocator of health care resources. Perhaps current concepts regarding patient hospitalization for certain surgical procedures would change if the physician were motivated (either intellectually or financially) toward office-based surgery on a individual case basis. Perhaps, in selected elective surgical procedures, patients could be sufficiently informed so that they could voice an opinion or preference relative to selection of the surgical environment. Additional research in this area is necessary. Expanded insight into established patterns of patient hospitalization practices and general anesthesia usage on these hospitalized patients may also be in order. Realizing full well the role of independent physician judgment in these matters, it may be that selection of general anesthesia and hospitalization for some elective surgery procedures reflects the physician's training rather than his appreciation of alternate routes for rendering reasonable and responsible care.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in podiatry\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"413-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in podiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in podiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从这项研究中可以清楚地看出,在美国进行的大多数足部手术病例可能是在办公室进行的,当个案考虑是在个案的基础上进行的。这整个研究反映了医生的偏好相对于选择手术环境的管理疾病和足部手术的重要性。在某些地区,对于手术地点存在强烈的共识意见,但绝大多数回应表明,在医生选择手术环境之前,需要逐个评估。德尔菲研究在这方面被阿拉巴马州足病医生的调查很好地验证了。传统上,在美国,医生是病人的代理人和卫生保健资源的分配者。如果医生有动机(无论是智力上的还是经济上的)在个案基础上进行基于办公室的手术,那么目前关于病人住院接受某些外科手术的概念可能会改变。也许,在选择性的外科手术中,患者可以得到充分的信息,以便他们可以就手术环境的选择发表意见或偏好。这方面的进一步研究是必要的。进一步深入了解患者住院实践的既定模式和这些住院患者的全身麻醉使用也可能是有序的。充分认识到医生在这些问题上的独立判断的作用,可能是选择全身麻醉和住院进行一些选择性手术程序反映了医生的培训,而不是他对提供合理和负责任的护理的替代途径的欣赏。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rationale for office-based foot surgery.

It is clear from this study that the majority of foot surgical cases being done in the United States may be performed in an office-based surgical setting when individual case considerations are made on a case-by-case basis. This entire study reflects the importance of physician preference relative to selecting a surgical environment for management of disorders and surgery of the foot. In some areas, a strong consensus of opinion existed concerning one surgical location or the other, but the overwhelming majority of responses indicated a case-by-case evaluation prior to physician selection of the surgical environment. The Delphi study was well validated by the survey of Alabama podiatrists in this regard. Traditionally, within the United States, the physician has acted as an agent to the patient and as an allocator of health care resources. Perhaps current concepts regarding patient hospitalization for certain surgical procedures would change if the physician were motivated (either intellectually or financially) toward office-based surgery on a individual case basis. Perhaps, in selected elective surgical procedures, patients could be sufficiently informed so that they could voice an opinion or preference relative to selection of the surgical environment. Additional research in this area is necessary. Expanded insight into established patterns of patient hospitalization practices and general anesthesia usage on these hospitalized patients may also be in order. Realizing full well the role of independent physician judgment in these matters, it may be that selection of general anesthesia and hospitalization for some elective surgery procedures reflects the physician's training rather than his appreciation of alternate routes for rendering reasonable and responsible care.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信