残气量预测的准确性——对肺功能障碍患者体成分估计的影响。

A C Hackney, D T Deutsch
{"title":"残气量预测的准确性——对肺功能障碍患者体成分估计的影响。","authors":"A C Hackney,&nbsp;D T Deutsch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accuracy of predicting residual volume (RV) and the effect of employing such predictions in the assessment of body composition by hydrostatic weighing was examined. Prediction equations derived by Wilmore (Med. Sci. Sports, 1969) and Boren et al. (Am. J. Med., 1966) were cross-validated on 400 male subjects with varying degrees of pulmonary dysfunction. Statistical analysis included comparison of predicted vs measured RV and regression analysis of measured on predicted values. Neither equation met acceptable statistical criteria (p greater than .05). Underwater weights were calculated based upon the measured RV and an assumed standard body weight, body density, and percent body fat (i.e., 70 kg, 1.0647 g/cc and 15.0%). Predicted RV was then substituted in the calculation and the effect on standardized values examined, between the calculated and standardized percent fat value with both equations. Results suggest in the present subjects, RV cannot be accurately predicted and the use of such prediction equations introduces sizable errors in body composition estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75669,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport","volume":"10 2","pages":"88-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of residual volume prediction--effects on body composition estimation in pulmonary dysfunction.\",\"authors\":\"A C Hackney,&nbsp;D T Deutsch\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The accuracy of predicting residual volume (RV) and the effect of employing such predictions in the assessment of body composition by hydrostatic weighing was examined. Prediction equations derived by Wilmore (Med. Sci. Sports, 1969) and Boren et al. (Am. J. Med., 1966) were cross-validated on 400 male subjects with varying degrees of pulmonary dysfunction. Statistical analysis included comparison of predicted vs measured RV and regression analysis of measured on predicted values. Neither equation met acceptable statistical criteria (p greater than .05). Underwater weights were calculated based upon the measured RV and an assumed standard body weight, body density, and percent body fat (i.e., 70 kg, 1.0647 g/cc and 15.0%). Predicted RV was then substituted in the calculation and the effect on standardized values examined, between the calculated and standardized percent fat value with both equations. Results suggest in the present subjects, RV cannot be accurately predicted and the use of such prediction equations introduces sizable errors in body composition estimation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"88-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了静压称量法预测残馀体积(RV)的准确性,以及该方法在评估机体成分时的应用效果。由Wilmore (Med. Sci.)导出的预测方程。体育,1969)和Boren等人。J. Med., 1966)对400名不同程度肺功能障碍的男性受试者进行了交叉验证。统计分析包括预测RV与实测值的比较和实测值与预测值的回归分析。两个方程均不符合可接受的统计标准(p > 0.05)。根据测量的RV和假设的标准体重、体密度和体脂百分比(即70 kg、1.0647 g/cc和15.0%)计算水下体重。然后在计算中代入预测的RV,并在两个方程的计算脂肪百分比值和标准化脂肪百分比值之间检验对标准值的影响。结果表明,在目前的研究对象中,RV不能被准确地预测,并且使用这种预测方程会在体成分估计中引入相当大的误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of residual volume prediction--effects on body composition estimation in pulmonary dysfunction.

The accuracy of predicting residual volume (RV) and the effect of employing such predictions in the assessment of body composition by hydrostatic weighing was examined. Prediction equations derived by Wilmore (Med. Sci. Sports, 1969) and Boren et al. (Am. J. Med., 1966) were cross-validated on 400 male subjects with varying degrees of pulmonary dysfunction. Statistical analysis included comparison of predicted vs measured RV and regression analysis of measured on predicted values. Neither equation met acceptable statistical criteria (p greater than .05). Underwater weights were calculated based upon the measured RV and an assumed standard body weight, body density, and percent body fat (i.e., 70 kg, 1.0647 g/cc and 15.0%). Predicted RV was then substituted in the calculation and the effect on standardized values examined, between the calculated and standardized percent fat value with both equations. Results suggest in the present subjects, RV cannot be accurately predicted and the use of such prediction equations introduces sizable errors in body composition estimation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信