布鲁氏菌素皮肤试验对牛布鲁氏菌病的评价。

International journal of zoonoses Pub Date : 1985-03-01
C C Chukwu
{"title":"布鲁氏菌素皮肤试验对牛布鲁氏菌病的评价。","authors":"C C Chukwu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic efficiency of the Brucellin skin test for bovine brucellosis was evaluated using cattle of known history. The test was negative in six out of 14 heifers (42.9%) infected with virulent Brucella abortus (Br. abortus) strain 544. In four cattle vaccinated with a reduced dose of Br. abortus strain 19 vaccine (5 X 10(9) live organisms) the skin test became positive in all the animals but two weeks after immunization. However, all the vaccinates became negative 14 weeks after vaccination, whereas nine out of 14 heifers (64.3%) vaccinated with killed Br. abortus 45/20 adjuvant vaccine (Duphavac vaccine) were still positive 18 months post immunization. Four control cattle were persistently negative. It was considered that the procedure would be most useful for testing non-exposed cattle and should be used as a screen test. It is not useful as a diagnostic test for cattle immunized with Duphavac vaccine. A recommendation is made for interpreting the Brucellin skin test for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in non-exposed herds.</p>","PeriodicalId":75942,"journal":{"name":"International journal of zoonoses","volume":"12 1","pages":"6-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of brucellin skin test for bovine brucellosis.\",\"authors\":\"C C Chukwu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnostic efficiency of the Brucellin skin test for bovine brucellosis was evaluated using cattle of known history. The test was negative in six out of 14 heifers (42.9%) infected with virulent Brucella abortus (Br. abortus) strain 544. In four cattle vaccinated with a reduced dose of Br. abortus strain 19 vaccine (5 X 10(9) live organisms) the skin test became positive in all the animals but two weeks after immunization. However, all the vaccinates became negative 14 weeks after vaccination, whereas nine out of 14 heifers (64.3%) vaccinated with killed Br. abortus 45/20 adjuvant vaccine (Duphavac vaccine) were still positive 18 months post immunization. Four control cattle were persistently negative. It was considered that the procedure would be most useful for testing non-exposed cattle and should be used as a screen test. It is not useful as a diagnostic test for cattle immunized with Duphavac vaccine. A recommendation is made for interpreting the Brucellin skin test for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in non-exposed herds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of zoonoses\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"6-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of zoonoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of zoonoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布鲁氏菌素皮肤试验对牛布鲁氏菌病的诊断效率用已知病史的牛进行评估。14头感染强毒流产布鲁氏菌(Brucella abortus)的小母牛中有6头(42.9%)检测呈阴性。Abortus)菌株544。在4头牛中接种了减少剂量的Br。流产株19疫苗(5 × 10(9)活菌)除免疫后2周外,所有动物皮肤试验均呈阳性。然而,所有疫苗在接种14周后都变为阴性,而14头小牛中有9头(64.3%)接种了杀Br。流产45/20佐剂疫苗(Duphavac疫苗)免疫后18个月仍呈阳性。4头对照牛持续呈阴性。有人认为,这一程序对检验未受辐射的牛最有用,应作为筛选试验。它不能作为杜帕瓦疫苗免疫牛的诊断试验。建议解释布鲁氏菌素皮肤试验在未暴露的牛群中诊断布鲁氏菌病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of brucellin skin test for bovine brucellosis.

The diagnostic efficiency of the Brucellin skin test for bovine brucellosis was evaluated using cattle of known history. The test was negative in six out of 14 heifers (42.9%) infected with virulent Brucella abortus (Br. abortus) strain 544. In four cattle vaccinated with a reduced dose of Br. abortus strain 19 vaccine (5 X 10(9) live organisms) the skin test became positive in all the animals but two weeks after immunization. However, all the vaccinates became negative 14 weeks after vaccination, whereas nine out of 14 heifers (64.3%) vaccinated with killed Br. abortus 45/20 adjuvant vaccine (Duphavac vaccine) were still positive 18 months post immunization. Four control cattle were persistently negative. It was considered that the procedure would be most useful for testing non-exposed cattle and should be used as a screen test. It is not useful as a diagnostic test for cattle immunized with Duphavac vaccine. A recommendation is made for interpreting the Brucellin skin test for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in non-exposed herds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信