{"title":"边缘性障碍——诊断概念的有效性。","authors":"A A Dahl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable concepts of borderline disorders are a prerequisite for studies of validity. Gunderson's and DSM-III's definition of Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and DSM-III's definition of Schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) fulfill these demands. The empirical evidence for descriptive, construct and predictive validity of these disorders is presented and discussed. The review concludes that BPD has descriptive validity but lacks the 2 other stronger types of validity. SPD has both descriptive and construct validity but lacks predictive validity. Various strengths and weaknesses of the empirical studies of these borderline concepts are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77773,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric developments","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Borderline disorders--the validity of the diagnostic concept.\",\"authors\":\"A A Dahl\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reliable concepts of borderline disorders are a prerequisite for studies of validity. Gunderson's and DSM-III's definition of Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and DSM-III's definition of Schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) fulfill these demands. The empirical evidence for descriptive, construct and predictive validity of these disorders is presented and discussed. The review concludes that BPD has descriptive validity but lacks the 2 other stronger types of validity. SPD has both descriptive and construct validity but lacks predictive validity. Various strengths and weaknesses of the empirical studies of these borderline concepts are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric developments\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric developments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Borderline disorders--the validity of the diagnostic concept.
Reliable concepts of borderline disorders are a prerequisite for studies of validity. Gunderson's and DSM-III's definition of Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and DSM-III's definition of Schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) fulfill these demands. The empirical evidence for descriptive, construct and predictive validity of these disorders is presented and discussed. The review concludes that BPD has descriptive validity but lacks the 2 other stronger types of validity. SPD has both descriptive and construct validity but lacks predictive validity. Various strengths and weaknesses of the empirical studies of these borderline concepts are discussed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
