婴儿的频率特异性贝拉。

M L Hyde
{"title":"婴儿的频率特异性贝拉。","authors":"M L Hyde","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Click BERA has several limitations, both physical and physiological, for early audiological assessment. It cannot quantify the audiometric contour, detect high or low frequency hearing loss, or reveal residual low frequency hearing. Several methods of cochlear place-specific BERA are reviewed briefly. BERA using tonepip stimuli in band-reject masking noise is described in more detail for both nil-risk and at-risk infants. Technical and normative problems are outlined. Most babies give clear ABRs to 40 dBnHL tonepips, but threshold distributions are broader at 500 Hz than for higher frequency tonepips or clicks. Thresholds improve over the first four months, especially at 500 Hz. Cases of click/tonepip threshold differences are presented. Place-specific testing may be a useful component of early assessment. Further research is needed to determine its limitations and relevance to early management.</p>","PeriodicalId":76657,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement","volume":"14 ","pages":"19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency-specific BERA in infants.\",\"authors\":\"M L Hyde\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Click BERA has several limitations, both physical and physiological, for early audiological assessment. It cannot quantify the audiometric contour, detect high or low frequency hearing loss, or reveal residual low frequency hearing. Several methods of cochlear place-specific BERA are reviewed briefly. BERA using tonepip stimuli in band-reject masking noise is described in more detail for both nil-risk and at-risk infants. Technical and normative problems are outlined. Most babies give clear ABRs to 40 dBnHL tonepips, but threshold distributions are broader at 500 Hz than for higher frequency tonepips or clicks. Thresholds improve over the first four months, especially at 500 Hz. Cases of click/tonepip threshold differences are presented. Place-specific testing may be a useful component of early assessment. Further research is needed to determine its limitations and relevance to early management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"19-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于早期听力学评估,Click BERA有一些生理和生理上的限制。它不能量化听力轮廓,不能检测高频或低频听力损失,也不能显示残留的低频听力。综述了几种耳蜗部位特异性贝拉的方法。在无风险和有风险的婴儿中,更详细地描述了在带抑制掩蔽噪声中使用耳背刺激的贝拉。概述了技术和规范问题。大多数婴儿在40 dBnHL的音尖上发出清晰的abr,但500 Hz的阈值分布比更高频率的音尖或咔嚓声更宽。阈值在前四个月有所提高,特别是在500hz时。给出了click/tonepip阈值差异的案例。特定地点的测试可能是早期评估的一个有用组成部分。需要进一步的研究来确定其局限性及其与早期管理的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency-specific BERA in infants.

Click BERA has several limitations, both physical and physiological, for early audiological assessment. It cannot quantify the audiometric contour, detect high or low frequency hearing loss, or reveal residual low frequency hearing. Several methods of cochlear place-specific BERA are reviewed briefly. BERA using tonepip stimuli in band-reject masking noise is described in more detail for both nil-risk and at-risk infants. Technical and normative problems are outlined. Most babies give clear ABRs to 40 dBnHL tonepips, but threshold distributions are broader at 500 Hz than for higher frequency tonepips or clicks. Thresholds improve over the first four months, especially at 500 Hz. Cases of click/tonepip threshold differences are presented. Place-specific testing may be a useful component of early assessment. Further research is needed to determine its limitations and relevance to early management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信