长期单侧传导性听力损失后中央处理的案例研究。

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1985-07-01
K L Anderson
{"title":"长期单侧传导性听力损失后中央处理的案例研究。","authors":"K L Anderson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This single-subject study reported the audibility and speech-processing performance of a man who at age 22 had an impacted foreign body removed from the bony portion of his L ear canal, it having been there since about age 7. Otologic and audiologic assessment, records of failing school screening, and subject and family history agreed on an uncomplicated conductive hearing level of 30-40 db. Immediately on removing the block, audiograms and tympanograms were normal (HTL less than or equal to 20 db at .25-8 kc/s) and remained so for the 14 mo of the study. At 8 days and at 5 and 14 mo post-blockage, a speech-in-noise test at 50 db HL, at S/N's of 30, 20, 15, 10, 5, and 0 db was administered along with the SSW test. At 8 days, S-in-N scores (compared to 10 in-house normal controls) were abnormally low in both ears, but especially in the L ear (e.g., at S/N = 0, L ear score was only 8% correct compared to the controls' 86.4%). Distinct improvement occurred at 5 and further at 14 mo, but at 14 mo both ears were still yielding scores 1 S.D. below the control mean. Similarly, SSW scores were abnormal for both ears; at 5 mo post-blockage the L ear still yielded abnormal scores, but yielded normal scores at 14 mo post-blockage. It may be concluded that a unilateral conductive hearing loss, even though contracted well past the age thought to be crucial in auditory perceptual development, may have a deleterious effect on auditory processing of stimuli entering not only the attenuated but also the normal ear, and that though this deleterious effect may eventually be overcome it may require a surprisingly long time for it to disappear.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"25 3","pages":"201-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case study of central processing following long-standing unilateral conductive hearing loss.\",\"authors\":\"K L Anderson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This single-subject study reported the audibility and speech-processing performance of a man who at age 22 had an impacted foreign body removed from the bony portion of his L ear canal, it having been there since about age 7. Otologic and audiologic assessment, records of failing school screening, and subject and family history agreed on an uncomplicated conductive hearing level of 30-40 db. Immediately on removing the block, audiograms and tympanograms were normal (HTL less than or equal to 20 db at .25-8 kc/s) and remained so for the 14 mo of the study. At 8 days and at 5 and 14 mo post-blockage, a speech-in-noise test at 50 db HL, at S/N's of 30, 20, 15, 10, 5, and 0 db was administered along with the SSW test. At 8 days, S-in-N scores (compared to 10 in-house normal controls) were abnormally low in both ears, but especially in the L ear (e.g., at S/N = 0, L ear score was only 8% correct compared to the controls' 86.4%). Distinct improvement occurred at 5 and further at 14 mo, but at 14 mo both ears were still yielding scores 1 S.D. below the control mean. Similarly, SSW scores were abnormal for both ears; at 5 mo post-blockage the L ear still yielded abnormal scores, but yielded normal scores at 14 mo post-blockage. It may be concluded that a unilateral conductive hearing loss, even though contracted well past the age thought to be crucial in auditory perceptual development, may have a deleterious effect on auditory processing of stimuli entering not only the attenuated but also the normal ear, and that though this deleterious effect may eventually be overcome it may require a surprisingly long time for it to disappear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"201-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项单对象研究报告了一名男子的听力和语言处理表现,他22岁时从他的左耳道骨部分取出了一个异物,它从7岁开始就在那里。耳科和听力学评估、未通过学校筛查的记录、受试者和家族史一致认为,简单的传导性听力水平为30-40分贝。立即移除块,听力图和鼓室图正常(在0.25 -8 kc/s下HTL小于或等于20 db),并在研究的14个月中保持正常。阻断后8天和5、14个月,在50 db HL、30、20、15、10、5和0 db的信噪比下进行语音噪声测试,同时进行SSW测试。在第8天,双耳的S-in-N评分(与10个内部正常对照相比)异常低,但特别是在左耳(例如,在S/N = 0时,左耳评分只有8%的正确率,而对照组的正确率为86.4%)。在第5个月和第14个月时出现了明显的改善,但在第14个月时,两只耳朵的得分仍然比对照平均值低1 sd。同样,双耳的SSW评分也不正常;在阻塞后5个月,左耳仍出现异常评分,但在阻塞后14个月出现正常评分。可以得出这样的结论:单侧传导性听力损失,即使是在被认为对听觉知觉发展至关重要的年龄之后,也可能对传入弱耳和正常耳的刺激的听觉处理产生有害影响,尽管这种有害影响最终可能被克服,但它可能需要很长时间才能消失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A case study of central processing following long-standing unilateral conductive hearing loss.

This single-subject study reported the audibility and speech-processing performance of a man who at age 22 had an impacted foreign body removed from the bony portion of his L ear canal, it having been there since about age 7. Otologic and audiologic assessment, records of failing school screening, and subject and family history agreed on an uncomplicated conductive hearing level of 30-40 db. Immediately on removing the block, audiograms and tympanograms were normal (HTL less than or equal to 20 db at .25-8 kc/s) and remained so for the 14 mo of the study. At 8 days and at 5 and 14 mo post-blockage, a speech-in-noise test at 50 db HL, at S/N's of 30, 20, 15, 10, 5, and 0 db was administered along with the SSW test. At 8 days, S-in-N scores (compared to 10 in-house normal controls) were abnormally low in both ears, but especially in the L ear (e.g., at S/N = 0, L ear score was only 8% correct compared to the controls' 86.4%). Distinct improvement occurred at 5 and further at 14 mo, but at 14 mo both ears were still yielding scores 1 S.D. below the control mean. Similarly, SSW scores were abnormal for both ears; at 5 mo post-blockage the L ear still yielded abnormal scores, but yielded normal scores at 14 mo post-blockage. It may be concluded that a unilateral conductive hearing loss, even though contracted well past the age thought to be crucial in auditory perceptual development, may have a deleterious effect on auditory processing of stimuli entering not only the attenuated but also the normal ear, and that though this deleterious effect may eventually be overcome it may require a surprisingly long time for it to disappear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信