前后比率的功能度量。

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1985-04-01
J J Dempsey
{"title":"前后比率的功能度量。","authors":"J J Dempsey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monaural hearing aid users (aged 26-75 yrs; mn: 52 yrs) with moderate to severe bilateral sensorineural losses tracked free field sweep-frequency Bekesy thresholds from .25-4 kc/s in a typical audiological test booth. Each S was fitted, on the ear on which S usually wore an aid, with successively 3 directional microphone hearing aids (DMHAs) now commonly issued, with similar frequency response and gain characteristics but with a range, as shown by the manikin KEMAR in an anechoic chamber, of 8 db in FBR. Warbled tones were presented from a loudspeaker either 1 m directly ahead of or 1 m directly behind S's head. The difference in thresholds (180 degrees data subtracted from 0 degree data) in db was taken as functional front-to-back ratio (FBR) at selected frequencies. These were compared with FDRs from KEMAR. The functional FBR was shown to be sensitive enough (p less than .001) to differentiate among DMHAs, and the aids were on the average ordered similarly from highest to lowest by both KEMAR and functional FBRs. It was found that the data at 1 kc/s were predominately useful to test. However, individual differences were such that it was concluded that more reliance should be placed on a functional test of FBR. In addition, a significant Pearson r of 0.42 (p less than .01) was obtained between functional FBR and monosyllabic DS (S/N: 0 db). These results suggest that the functional FBR may play an important role in measuring hearing aid selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"25 2","pages":"91-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A functional measure of front-to-back ratio.\",\"authors\":\"J J Dempsey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monaural hearing aid users (aged 26-75 yrs; mn: 52 yrs) with moderate to severe bilateral sensorineural losses tracked free field sweep-frequency Bekesy thresholds from .25-4 kc/s in a typical audiological test booth. Each S was fitted, on the ear on which S usually wore an aid, with successively 3 directional microphone hearing aids (DMHAs) now commonly issued, with similar frequency response and gain characteristics but with a range, as shown by the manikin KEMAR in an anechoic chamber, of 8 db in FBR. Warbled tones were presented from a loudspeaker either 1 m directly ahead of or 1 m directly behind S's head. The difference in thresholds (180 degrees data subtracted from 0 degree data) in db was taken as functional front-to-back ratio (FBR) at selected frequencies. These were compared with FDRs from KEMAR. The functional FBR was shown to be sensitive enough (p less than .001) to differentiate among DMHAs, and the aids were on the average ordered similarly from highest to lowest by both KEMAR and functional FBRs. It was found that the data at 1 kc/s were predominately useful to test. However, individual differences were such that it was concluded that more reliance should be placed on a functional test of FBR. In addition, a significant Pearson r of 0.42 (p less than .01) was obtained between functional FBR and monosyllabic DS (S/N: 0 db). These results suggest that the functional FBR may play an important role in measuring hearing aid selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"91-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单耳助听器使用者(26-75岁);在一个典型的听力学测试室中,患有中度至重度双侧感觉神经丧失的患者追踪到自由场扫描频率Bekesy阈值为0.25 -4 kc/s。在每个S通常佩戴助听器的耳朵上,连续安装3个定向麦克风助听器(DMHAs),这些助听器具有相似的频率响应和增益特性,但其范围(如消声室中的KEMAR模型所示)在FBR中为8 db。从S头部正前方1米处或正后方1米处的扬声器中播放颤音。阈值(从0度数据中减去180度数据)在db中的差值作为选定频率下的功能前后比(FBR)。将这些数据与KEMAR的fdr进行比较。功能性FBR显示出足够的敏感性(p < 0.001)来区分dmha,并且KEMAR和功能性FBR的辅助指标平均从高到低排序相似。结果发现,1kc /s的数据对测试非常有用。然而,由于个体差异很大,因此得出的结论是,应该更多地依赖FBR的功能测试。此外,功能性FBR与单音节DS (S/N: 0 db)之间的Pearson r为0.42 (p < 0.01)。这些结果表明功能性FBR可能在助听器选择中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A functional measure of front-to-back ratio.

Monaural hearing aid users (aged 26-75 yrs; mn: 52 yrs) with moderate to severe bilateral sensorineural losses tracked free field sweep-frequency Bekesy thresholds from .25-4 kc/s in a typical audiological test booth. Each S was fitted, on the ear on which S usually wore an aid, with successively 3 directional microphone hearing aids (DMHAs) now commonly issued, with similar frequency response and gain characteristics but with a range, as shown by the manikin KEMAR in an anechoic chamber, of 8 db in FBR. Warbled tones were presented from a loudspeaker either 1 m directly ahead of or 1 m directly behind S's head. The difference in thresholds (180 degrees data subtracted from 0 degree data) in db was taken as functional front-to-back ratio (FBR) at selected frequencies. These were compared with FDRs from KEMAR. The functional FBR was shown to be sensitive enough (p less than .001) to differentiate among DMHAs, and the aids were on the average ordered similarly from highest to lowest by both KEMAR and functional FBRs. It was found that the data at 1 kc/s were predominately useful to test. However, individual differences were such that it was concluded that more reliance should be placed on a functional test of FBR. In addition, a significant Pearson r of 0.42 (p less than .01) was obtained between functional FBR and monosyllabic DS (S/N: 0 db). These results suggest that the functional FBR may play an important role in measuring hearing aid selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信