{"title":"碎片化控制、集体风险:多智能体人工智能和即将到来的治理危机","authors":"Caryn Lusinchi","doi":"10.1002/aaai.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-agent artificial intelligence (MAAI) systems are increasingly deployed across economic and digital infrastructures. Existing regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and related initiatives, largely focus on individual AI systems and are therefore poorly suited to govern risks that arise from agent interaction. This paper argues that multi-agent AI introduces distinct governance challenges, including emergent behavior, tacit coordination, cascading systemic risks, and difficulties in assigning accountability. Traditional risk management approaches, which rely on static and component-based analysis, are inadequate for adaptive, networked systems operating across jurisdictions.</p><p>Through a comparative review of policy developments in the European Union, United States, and Asia-Pacific region, the paper identifies a growing governance gap, alongside early regulatory experimentation such as China's emerging standards for intelligent agents. The paper concludes that effective oversight will require a shift from model-centric regulation toward system-level and adaptive governance frameworks capable of addressing the collective dynamics of multi-agent AI systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7854,"journal":{"name":"Ai Magazine","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fragmented control, collective risk: multi-agent AI and the coming governance crisis\",\"authors\":\"Caryn Lusinchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aaai.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multi-agent artificial intelligence (MAAI) systems are increasingly deployed across economic and digital infrastructures. Existing regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and related initiatives, largely focus on individual AI systems and are therefore poorly suited to govern risks that arise from agent interaction. This paper argues that multi-agent AI introduces distinct governance challenges, including emergent behavior, tacit coordination, cascading systemic risks, and difficulties in assigning accountability. Traditional risk management approaches, which rely on static and component-based analysis, are inadequate for adaptive, networked systems operating across jurisdictions.</p><p>Through a comparative review of policy developments in the European Union, United States, and Asia-Pacific region, the paper identifies a growing governance gap, alongside early regulatory experimentation such as China's emerging standards for intelligent agents. The paper concludes that effective oversight will require a shift from model-centric regulation toward system-level and adaptive governance frameworks capable of addressing the collective dynamics of multi-agent AI systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ai Magazine\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.70105\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ai Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.70105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.70105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fragmented control, collective risk: multi-agent AI and the coming governance crisis
Multi-agent artificial intelligence (MAAI) systems are increasingly deployed across economic and digital infrastructures. Existing regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and related initiatives, largely focus on individual AI systems and are therefore poorly suited to govern risks that arise from agent interaction. This paper argues that multi-agent AI introduces distinct governance challenges, including emergent behavior, tacit coordination, cascading systemic risks, and difficulties in assigning accountability. Traditional risk management approaches, which rely on static and component-based analysis, are inadequate for adaptive, networked systems operating across jurisdictions.
Through a comparative review of policy developments in the European Union, United States, and Asia-Pacific region, the paper identifies a growing governance gap, alongside early regulatory experimentation such as China's emerging standards for intelligent agents. The paper concludes that effective oversight will require a shift from model-centric regulation toward system-level and adaptive governance frameworks capable of addressing the collective dynamics of multi-agent AI systems.
期刊介绍:
AI Magazine publishes original articles that are reasonably self-contained and aimed at a broad spectrum of the AI community. Technical content should be kept to a minimum. In general, the magazine does not publish articles that have been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The magazine welcomes the contribution of articles on the theory and practice of AI as well as general survey articles, tutorial articles on timely topics, conference or symposia or workshop reports, and timely columns on topics of interest to AI scientists.