碎片化控制、集体风险:多智能体人工智能和即将到来的治理危机

IF 3.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ai Magazine Pub Date : 2026-10-15 DOI:10.1002/aaai.70105
Caryn Lusinchi
{"title":"碎片化控制、集体风险:多智能体人工智能和即将到来的治理危机","authors":"Caryn Lusinchi","doi":"10.1002/aaai.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-agent artificial intelligence (MAAI) systems are increasingly deployed across economic and digital infrastructures. Existing regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and related initiatives, largely focus on individual AI systems and are therefore poorly suited to govern risks that arise from agent interaction. This paper argues that multi-agent AI introduces distinct governance challenges, including emergent behavior, tacit coordination, cascading systemic risks, and difficulties in assigning accountability. Traditional risk management approaches, which rely on static and component-based analysis, are inadequate for adaptive, networked systems operating across jurisdictions.</p><p>Through a comparative review of policy developments in the European Union, United States, and Asia-Pacific region, the paper identifies a growing governance gap, alongside early regulatory experimentation such as China's emerging standards for intelligent agents. The paper concludes that effective oversight will require a shift from model-centric regulation toward system-level and adaptive governance frameworks capable of addressing the collective dynamics of multi-agent AI systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7854,"journal":{"name":"Ai Magazine","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fragmented control, collective risk: multi-agent AI and the coming governance crisis\",\"authors\":\"Caryn Lusinchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aaai.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multi-agent artificial intelligence (MAAI) systems are increasingly deployed across economic and digital infrastructures. Existing regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and related initiatives, largely focus on individual AI systems and are therefore poorly suited to govern risks that arise from agent interaction. This paper argues that multi-agent AI introduces distinct governance challenges, including emergent behavior, tacit coordination, cascading systemic risks, and difficulties in assigning accountability. Traditional risk management approaches, which rely on static and component-based analysis, are inadequate for adaptive, networked systems operating across jurisdictions.</p><p>Through a comparative review of policy developments in the European Union, United States, and Asia-Pacific region, the paper identifies a growing governance gap, alongside early regulatory experimentation such as China's emerging standards for intelligent agents. The paper concludes that effective oversight will require a shift from model-centric regulation toward system-level and adaptive governance frameworks capable of addressing the collective dynamics of multi-agent AI systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ai Magazine\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.70105\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ai Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.70105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.70105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多智能体人工智能(MAAI)系统越来越多地部署在经济和数字基础设施中。现有的监管框架,包括欧盟人工智能法案和相关举措,主要侧重于单个人工智能系统,因此不适合管理由代理交互产生的风险。本文认为,多智能体人工智能引入了不同的治理挑战,包括紧急行为、默契协调、级联系统风险和分配责任的困难。传统的风险管理方法依赖于静态和基于组件的分析,对于跨司法管辖区的自适应网络系统来说是不够的。通过对欧盟、美国和亚太地区政策发展的比较回顾,本文发现了一个日益扩大的治理差距,以及中国新兴的智能代理标准等早期监管实验。本文的结论是,有效的监管将需要从以模型为中心的监管转向能够解决多智能体人工智能系统集体动态问题的系统级和自适应治理框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fragmented control, collective risk: multi-agent AI and the coming governance crisis

Multi-agent artificial intelligence (MAAI) systems are increasingly deployed across economic and digital infrastructures. Existing regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and related initiatives, largely focus on individual AI systems and are therefore poorly suited to govern risks that arise from agent interaction. This paper argues that multi-agent AI introduces distinct governance challenges, including emergent behavior, tacit coordination, cascading systemic risks, and difficulties in assigning accountability. Traditional risk management approaches, which rely on static and component-based analysis, are inadequate for adaptive, networked systems operating across jurisdictions.

Through a comparative review of policy developments in the European Union, United States, and Asia-Pacific region, the paper identifies a growing governance gap, alongside early regulatory experimentation such as China's emerging standards for intelligent agents. The paper concludes that effective oversight will require a shift from model-centric regulation toward system-level and adaptive governance frameworks capable of addressing the collective dynamics of multi-agent AI systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ai Magazine
Ai Magazine 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AI Magazine publishes original articles that are reasonably self-contained and aimed at a broad spectrum of the AI community. Technical content should be kept to a minimum. In general, the magazine does not publish articles that have been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The magazine welcomes the contribution of articles on the theory and practice of AI as well as general survey articles, tutorial articles on timely topics, conference or symposia or workshop reports, and timely columns on topics of interest to AI scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书