用因果机器学习估计潜在结果治疗效果的结构前/后测量方法。

IF 7.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Amota Ataneka, Benjamin Kelcey, Jean Baptiste Habarurema
{"title":"用因果机器学习估计潜在结果治疗效果的结构前/后测量方法。","authors":"Amota Ataneka, Benjamin Kelcey, Jean Baptiste Habarurema","doi":"10.1037/met0000878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research has developed a deep and diverse set of methods specifically designed to accommodate reflective latent factors (e.g., structural equation models). A critical limitation of conventional latent variable methods is that they typically operate under assumptions of linearity and almost always presume correct model specification (e.g., all nonlinearities and n-way interactions are known and included). Recent research in machine learning has relaxed such limitations by developing data-adaptive methods that identify treatment effects by empirically estimating the functional forms of relationships among covariates, treatment, and an outcome. A significant weakness of causal machine learning methods, however, is that they have been almost exclusively developed for observed outcome variables and have not considered reflective latent outcomes that are measured with error. In this study, we developed structural-after/before-measurement methods suitable for targeted machine learning with latent outcomes. The results suggested that the proposed estimators are nearly unbiased in finite samples even when the functional relationships are unknown and unspecified. We demonstrate the methods with an application to teachers' burnout study and compare their performance with conventional linear structural equation models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural-before/after-measurement approaches for estimating treatment effects in latent outcomes with causal machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Amota Ataneka, Benjamin Kelcey, Jean Baptiste Habarurema\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/met0000878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prior research has developed a deep and diverse set of methods specifically designed to accommodate reflective latent factors (e.g., structural equation models). A critical limitation of conventional latent variable methods is that they typically operate under assumptions of linearity and almost always presume correct model specification (e.g., all nonlinearities and n-way interactions are known and included). Recent research in machine learning has relaxed such limitations by developing data-adaptive methods that identify treatment effects by empirically estimating the functional forms of relationships among covariates, treatment, and an outcome. A significant weakness of causal machine learning methods, however, is that they have been almost exclusively developed for observed outcome variables and have not considered reflective latent outcomes that are measured with error. In this study, we developed structural-after/before-measurement methods suitable for targeted machine learning with latent outcomes. The results suggested that the proposed estimators are nearly unbiased in finite samples even when the functional relationships are unknown and unspecified. We demonstrate the methods with an application to teachers' burnout study and compare their performance with conventional linear structural equation models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000878\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural-before/after-measurement approaches for estimating treatment effects in latent outcomes with causal machine learning.

Prior research has developed a deep and diverse set of methods specifically designed to accommodate reflective latent factors (e.g., structural equation models). A critical limitation of conventional latent variable methods is that they typically operate under assumptions of linearity and almost always presume correct model specification (e.g., all nonlinearities and n-way interactions are known and included). Recent research in machine learning has relaxed such limitations by developing data-adaptive methods that identify treatment effects by empirically estimating the functional forms of relationships among covariates, treatment, and an outcome. A significant weakness of causal machine learning methods, however, is that they have been almost exclusively developed for observed outcome variables and have not considered reflective latent outcomes that are measured with error. In this study, we developed structural-after/before-measurement methods suitable for targeted machine learning with latent outcomes. The results suggested that the proposed estimators are nearly unbiased in finite samples even when the functional relationships are unknown and unspecified. We demonstrate the methods with an application to teachers' burnout study and compare their performance with conventional linear structural equation models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书