复杂髂骨疾病裸金属支架的长期耐久性:髂外动脉受累是晚期通畅丧失的主要决定因素。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
D Mastrorilli, C De Massari, E Forcella, M Nicolis, L Garriboli
{"title":"复杂髂骨疾病裸金属支架的长期耐久性:髂外动脉受累是晚期通畅丧失的主要决定因素。","authors":"D Mastrorilli, C De Massari, E Forcella, M Nicolis, L Garriboli","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.09.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Long-term durability after endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac disease remains incompletely defined. The present study evaluated late primary patency after bare-metal stenting (BMS) in TASC C-D lesions and examined whether anatomical extension beyond the common iliac artery influences long-term outcomes independently of traditional TASC classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including 153 consecutive iliac limbs with TASC C-D occlusive disease treated with BMS between 2014 and 2024. Covered stents, kissing configurations, and acute occlusions were excluded to ensure a homogeneous technical cohort. The primary endpoint was primary patency. Kaplan-Meier estimates were reported through 72 months. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) regression at τ = 72 months and Firth penalized logistic regression were applied to identify independent predictors while minimizing small-event bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success exceeded 97%, with no perioperative mortality. Primary patency remained high and comparable between TASC C and D lesions at 72 months (86% vs 84%; log-rank p = 0.8). In contrast, extension into the external iliac artery (EIA) was associated with progressive late attrition. Adjusted RMST analysis demonstrated a 7.6-month reduction in mean primary patency at 72 months for EIA-involved lesions (95% CI -11.6 to -3.6; p < 0.001). Firth regression confirmed increased late risk of patency loss at 60 months (OR 10.5; p = 0.034) and 72 months (OR 25.8; p = 0.003). Technical optimization (best-practice stenting) showed limited and model-dependent mitigation, without consistent protection across time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In complex iliac BMS reconstruction, long-term durability appears primarily determined by distal anatomical extension rather than TASC class. External iliac artery involvement identifies a subgroup at risk for late failure and may represent a more clinically meaningful stratification parameter for endovascular planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Durability of Bare-Metal Stenting in Complex Iliac Disease: External Iliac Artery Involvement as the Principal Determinant of Late Patency Loss.\",\"authors\":\"D Mastrorilli, C De Massari, E Forcella, M Nicolis, L Garriboli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.09.060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Long-term durability after endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac disease remains incompletely defined. The present study evaluated late primary patency after bare-metal stenting (BMS) in TASC C-D lesions and examined whether anatomical extension beyond the common iliac artery influences long-term outcomes independently of traditional TASC classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including 153 consecutive iliac limbs with TASC C-D occlusive disease treated with BMS between 2014 and 2024. Covered stents, kissing configurations, and acute occlusions were excluded to ensure a homogeneous technical cohort. The primary endpoint was primary patency. Kaplan-Meier estimates were reported through 72 months. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) regression at τ = 72 months and Firth penalized logistic regression were applied to identify independent predictors while minimizing small-event bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success exceeded 97%, with no perioperative mortality. Primary patency remained high and comparable between TASC C and D lesions at 72 months (86% vs 84%; log-rank p = 0.8). In contrast, extension into the external iliac artery (EIA) was associated with progressive late attrition. Adjusted RMST analysis demonstrated a 7.6-month reduction in mean primary patency at 72 months for EIA-involved lesions (95% CI -11.6 to -3.6; p < 0.001). Firth regression confirmed increased late risk of patency loss at 60 months (OR 10.5; p = 0.034) and 72 months (OR 25.8; p = 0.003). Technical optimization (best-practice stenting) showed limited and model-dependent mitigation, without consistent protection across time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In complex iliac BMS reconstruction, long-term durability appears primarily determined by distal anatomical extension rather than TASC class. External iliac artery involvement identifies a subgroup at risk for late failure and may represent a more clinically meaningful stratification parameter for endovascular planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2026.09.060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2026.09.060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:复杂主动脉髂疾病血管内治疗后的长期持久性仍不完全确定。本研究评估了裸金属支架(BMS)在TASC C-D病变后的晚期原发性通畅,并检查了髂总动脉以外的解剖延伸是否独立于传统TASC分类影响长期预后。方法:采用单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2014 - 2024年间153例连续接受BMS治疗的髂肢体TASC - d闭塞性疾病患者。排除覆盖支架,吻合结构和急性闭塞以确保同质技术队列。主要终点为原发性通畅。Kaplan-Meier估计是在72个月内报告的。应用τ = 72个月时的限制平均生存时间(RMST)回归和Firth惩罚逻辑回归来识别独立预测因子,同时最大限度地减少小事件偏差。结果:技术成功率超过97%,无围手术期死亡率。在72个月时,TASC C和D病变的原发性通畅度仍然很高,具有可比性(86% vs 84%; log-rank p = 0.8)。相反,延伸到髂外动脉(EIA)与进行性晚期磨损有关。校正后的RMST分析显示,在72个月时,累及eia病变的平均原发性通畅减少了7.6个月(95% CI -11.6至-3.6;p < 0.001)。第五次回归证实,在60个月(OR 10.5; p = 0.034)和72个月(OR 25.8; p = 0.003)时,晚期通畅丧失的风险增加。技术优化(最佳实践支架置入术)显示出有限且依赖于模型的缓解,没有跨时间点的一致保护。结论:在复杂的髂BMS重建中,长期耐久性似乎主要取决于远端解剖延伸而不是TASC类型。髂外动脉受累确定了一个有晚期衰竭风险的亚组,可能代表了一个更有临床意义的血管内规划分层参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Durability of Bare-Metal Stenting in Complex Iliac Disease: External Iliac Artery Involvement as the Principal Determinant of Late Patency Loss.

Objective: Long-term durability after endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac disease remains incompletely defined. The present study evaluated late primary patency after bare-metal stenting (BMS) in TASC C-D lesions and examined whether anatomical extension beyond the common iliac artery influences long-term outcomes independently of traditional TASC classification.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including 153 consecutive iliac limbs with TASC C-D occlusive disease treated with BMS between 2014 and 2024. Covered stents, kissing configurations, and acute occlusions were excluded to ensure a homogeneous technical cohort. The primary endpoint was primary patency. Kaplan-Meier estimates were reported through 72 months. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) regression at τ = 72 months and Firth penalized logistic regression were applied to identify independent predictors while minimizing small-event bias.

Results: Technical success exceeded 97%, with no perioperative mortality. Primary patency remained high and comparable between TASC C and D lesions at 72 months (86% vs 84%; log-rank p = 0.8). In contrast, extension into the external iliac artery (EIA) was associated with progressive late attrition. Adjusted RMST analysis demonstrated a 7.6-month reduction in mean primary patency at 72 months for EIA-involved lesions (95% CI -11.6 to -3.6; p < 0.001). Firth regression confirmed increased late risk of patency loss at 60 months (OR 10.5; p = 0.034) and 72 months (OR 25.8; p = 0.003). Technical optimization (best-practice stenting) showed limited and model-dependent mitigation, without consistent protection across time points.

Conclusions: In complex iliac BMS reconstruction, long-term durability appears primarily determined by distal anatomical extension rather than TASC class. External iliac artery involvement identifies a subgroup at risk for late failure and may represent a more clinically meaningful stratification parameter for endovascular planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书