Duk-Min Kim, Bayartungalag Batsaikhan, Dae-Gyu Im, Jae-Hoon Choi, Hyeon-Soo Seo, Bayartogtokh Buyankhishig, Seong-Taek Yun
{"title":"蒙古额尔登涅特矿区溶解硫酸盐硫氧同位素系统及硫化物氧化剂的相对贡献。","authors":"Duk-Min Kim, Bayartungalag Batsaikhan, Dae-Gyu Im, Jae-Hoon Choi, Hyeon-Soo Seo, Bayartogtokh Buyankhishig, Seong-Taek Yun","doi":"10.1007/s10653-026-03531-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dissolved sulfate, a major contaminant in mining areas, is generally produced by the oxidation of sulfides by either molecular oxygen or Fe(III). Because Fe(III) oxidizes sulfides much more rapidly, it contributes more effectively to elevated SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentrations. This study analyzed δ<sup>34</sup>S<sub>SO4</sub>, δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>SO4</sub>, δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>, and δ<sup>2</sup>H<sub>H2O</sub> in groundwater and surface water from the Erdenet mining region, Mongolia. The potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant of pyrite was inferred based on δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>SO4</sub> and δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>. Theoretical and previously reported minimum fractions appear to constrain the lower range of Fe(III) contributions, whereas sulfate reduction and gypsum dissolution may reduce the apparent fractions in some samples. In addition, gypsum precipitation appears to limit the upper range of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentrations, while the dissolution of efflorescent salts may increase SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentrations. After excluding samples potentially influenced by these processes, a positive relationship between the potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentration remains evident. These results suggest the potential importance of Fe(III)-mediated oxidation in controlling sulfate concentrations in mining environments. Furthermore, when additional geochemical processes are appropriately accounted for, the combined use of δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>SO4</sub> and δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> provides a systematic framework for elucidating the mechanisms of sulfide oxidation in such environments. Additionally, variations in the relationship between the potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentration across mining environments may provide evidence for site-specific geochemical processes, such as gypsum dissolution and sulfate reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"48 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sulfur and oxygen isotopic systematics of dissolved sulfate and relative contributions of sulfide oxidants in the Erdenet mining region, Mongolia.\",\"authors\":\"Duk-Min Kim, Bayartungalag Batsaikhan, Dae-Gyu Im, Jae-Hoon Choi, Hyeon-Soo Seo, Bayartogtokh Buyankhishig, Seong-Taek Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10653-026-03531-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dissolved sulfate, a major contaminant in mining areas, is generally produced by the oxidation of sulfides by either molecular oxygen or Fe(III). Because Fe(III) oxidizes sulfides much more rapidly, it contributes more effectively to elevated SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentrations. This study analyzed δ<sup>34</sup>S<sub>SO4</sub>, δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>SO4</sub>, δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>, and δ<sup>2</sup>H<sub>H2O</sub> in groundwater and surface water from the Erdenet mining region, Mongolia. The potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant of pyrite was inferred based on δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>SO4</sub> and δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>. Theoretical and previously reported minimum fractions appear to constrain the lower range of Fe(III) contributions, whereas sulfate reduction and gypsum dissolution may reduce the apparent fractions in some samples. In addition, gypsum precipitation appears to limit the upper range of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentrations, while the dissolution of efflorescent salts may increase SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentrations. After excluding samples potentially influenced by these processes, a positive relationship between the potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentration remains evident. These results suggest the potential importance of Fe(III)-mediated oxidation in controlling sulfate concentrations in mining environments. Furthermore, when additional geochemical processes are appropriately accounted for, the combined use of δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>SO4</sub> and δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> provides a systematic framework for elucidating the mechanisms of sulfide oxidation in such environments. Additionally, variations in the relationship between the potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> concentration across mining environments may provide evidence for site-specific geochemical processes, such as gypsum dissolution and sulfate reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"volume\":\"48 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03531-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03531-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sulfur and oxygen isotopic systematics of dissolved sulfate and relative contributions of sulfide oxidants in the Erdenet mining region, Mongolia.
Dissolved sulfate, a major contaminant in mining areas, is generally produced by the oxidation of sulfides by either molecular oxygen or Fe(III). Because Fe(III) oxidizes sulfides much more rapidly, it contributes more effectively to elevated SO42- concentrations. This study analyzed δ34SSO4, δ18OSO4, δ18OH2O, and δ2HH2O in groundwater and surface water from the Erdenet mining region, Mongolia. The potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant of pyrite was inferred based on δ18OSO4 and δ18OH2O. Theoretical and previously reported minimum fractions appear to constrain the lower range of Fe(III) contributions, whereas sulfate reduction and gypsum dissolution may reduce the apparent fractions in some samples. In addition, gypsum precipitation appears to limit the upper range of SO42- concentrations, while the dissolution of efflorescent salts may increase SO42- concentrations. After excluding samples potentially influenced by these processes, a positive relationship between the potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant and SO42- concentration remains evident. These results suggest the potential importance of Fe(III)-mediated oxidation in controlling sulfate concentrations in mining environments. Furthermore, when additional geochemical processes are appropriately accounted for, the combined use of δ18OSO4 and δ18OH2O provides a systematic framework for elucidating the mechanisms of sulfide oxidation in such environments. Additionally, variations in the relationship between the potential fraction of Fe(III) as the oxidant and SO42- concentration across mining environments may provide evidence for site-specific geochemical processes, such as gypsum dissolution and sulfate reduction.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.