非残疾和智障工人的比较:为什么他们会失业

James E. Martin , Frank R. Rusch , Thomas Lagomarcino , Janis Chadsey-Rusch
{"title":"非残疾和智障工人的比较:为什么他们会失业","authors":"James E. Martin ,&nbsp;Frank R. Rusch ,&nbsp;Thomas Lagomarcino ,&nbsp;Janis Chadsey-Rusch","doi":"10.1016/S0270-3092(86)80019-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reasons why 133 competitively employed nonhandicapped and 8 mentally retarded food service workers lost their jobs were examined. Reasons for termination were analyzed in terms of the social and production categories provided by <span>Greenspan's (1981)</span> social competence model. The majority of mentally retarded workers lost their jobs for productivity reasons, with some associated secondary social problems. The nonhandicapped workers lost their jobs for both social and production problems. When more than one reason was provided for termination, the impact of social problems increased. Results are discussed in terms of previous studies and in relation to their possible impact upon employment training and placement issues with mentally retarded workers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77671,"journal":{"name":"Applied research in mental retardation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 467-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0270-3092(86)80019-4","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between nonhandicapped and mentally retarded workers: Why they lose their jobs\",\"authors\":\"James E. Martin ,&nbsp;Frank R. Rusch ,&nbsp;Thomas Lagomarcino ,&nbsp;Janis Chadsey-Rusch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0270-3092(86)80019-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reasons why 133 competitively employed nonhandicapped and 8 mentally retarded food service workers lost their jobs were examined. Reasons for termination were analyzed in terms of the social and production categories provided by <span>Greenspan's (1981)</span> social competence model. The majority of mentally retarded workers lost their jobs for productivity reasons, with some associated secondary social problems. The nonhandicapped workers lost their jobs for both social and production problems. When more than one reason was provided for termination, the impact of social problems increased. Results are discussed in terms of previous studies and in relation to their possible impact upon employment training and placement issues with mentally retarded workers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied research in mental retardation\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 467-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0270-3092(86)80019-4\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied research in mental retardation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0270309286800194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied research in mental retardation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0270309286800194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

调查了133名有竞争力的非残疾和8名智障食品服务人员失业的原因。根据格林斯潘(1981)社会能力模型提供的社会和生产范畴分析终止原因。大多数智力迟钝的工人因为生产力原因而失去了工作,并伴随着一些次要的社会问题。非残疾工人由于社会和生产问题而失去了工作。当提供一个以上的终止理由时,社会问题的影响就会增加。根据以往的研究结果,以及这些研究结果对智障工人的就业培训和安置问题可能产生的影响,进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between nonhandicapped and mentally retarded workers: Why they lose their jobs

Reasons why 133 competitively employed nonhandicapped and 8 mentally retarded food service workers lost their jobs were examined. Reasons for termination were analyzed in terms of the social and production categories provided by Greenspan's (1981) social competence model. The majority of mentally retarded workers lost their jobs for productivity reasons, with some associated secondary social problems. The nonhandicapped workers lost their jobs for both social and production problems. When more than one reason was provided for termination, the impact of social problems increased. Results are discussed in terms of previous studies and in relation to their possible impact upon employment training and placement issues with mentally retarded workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信