基于集成机器学习的美国东南部湿地碳动态放大

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecological Processes Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-10 DOI:10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9
Ana Flavia Brancalion-Costa, Evan Farry, Latif Kalin, Mohamed M Hantush, Zutao Ouyang
{"title":"基于集成机器学习的美国东南部湿地碳动态放大","authors":"Ana Flavia Brancalion-Costa, Evan Farry, Latif Kalin, Mohamed M Hantush, Zutao Ouyang","doi":"10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the Southeastern United States (SE US) has been identified as a major terrestrial carbon sink, the balance of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes from its wetlands remains poorly constrained due to strong environmental heterogeneity and limited regional-scale assessments. In this study, we used observations from 24 wetland sites located in the SE US, including freshwater and salt marshes, to train machine learning models (Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, Artificial Neural Network, and Partial Least Squares Regression) to predict monthly mean gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (RECO), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) fluxes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model performance measured in <i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> for GPP ranged from 0.60 to 0.70, for RECO ranged from 0.44 to 0.56, for NEE ranged from 0.45 to 0.56, and for CH<sub>4</sub> flux ranged from 0.33 to 0.37. Random Forest and XGBoost were the most consistent algorithms between fluxes. Feature importance analyses of these two algorithms indicated that CO<sub>2</sub> flux predictions were primarily associated with vegetation and climatic variables, whereas CH<sub>4</sub> predictions were more strongly associated with soil and hydrological properties. Using a performance-weighted multi-model ensemble (MME), we scaled up the predictions for the entire SE US from 2000 to 2020. Spatial patterns of productivity and respiration showed flux hotspots in the Everglades, the Mississippi River Valley, and the Gulf and East Coast. We also identified hotspots of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in coastal North Carolina. Slightly lower CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were observed between 2000-2007 in comparison to 2008-2020. Mean annual wetland carbon fluxes were 280 ± 38 Tg CO<sub>2</sub>-C for GPP, 233 ± 51 Tg CO<sub>2</sub>-C for RECO, - 20 ± 18 Tg CO<sub>2</sub>-C for NEE, and 5.7 ± 1.7 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>-C for CH<sub>4</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results provide regional estimates of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes that improve carbon budget assessments and support future wetland management in the SE US. By identifying the spatial and temporal variability of carbon uptake and emissions across the region, this study provides a foundation for improving regional carbon accounting and informing wetland conservation and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9.</p>","PeriodicalId":11419,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Processes","volume":"15 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensemble machine learning-based scaling up of wetland carbon dynamics across the Southeastern U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Flavia Brancalion-Costa, Evan Farry, Latif Kalin, Mohamed M Hantush, Zutao Ouyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the Southeastern United States (SE US) has been identified as a major terrestrial carbon sink, the balance of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes from its wetlands remains poorly constrained due to strong environmental heterogeneity and limited regional-scale assessments. In this study, we used observations from 24 wetland sites located in the SE US, including freshwater and salt marshes, to train machine learning models (Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, Artificial Neural Network, and Partial Least Squares Regression) to predict monthly mean gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (RECO), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) fluxes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model performance measured in <i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> for GPP ranged from 0.60 to 0.70, for RECO ranged from 0.44 to 0.56, for NEE ranged from 0.45 to 0.56, and for CH<sub>4</sub> flux ranged from 0.33 to 0.37. Random Forest and XGBoost were the most consistent algorithms between fluxes. Feature importance analyses of these two algorithms indicated that CO<sub>2</sub> flux predictions were primarily associated with vegetation and climatic variables, whereas CH<sub>4</sub> predictions were more strongly associated with soil and hydrological properties. Using a performance-weighted multi-model ensemble (MME), we scaled up the predictions for the entire SE US from 2000 to 2020. Spatial patterns of productivity and respiration showed flux hotspots in the Everglades, the Mississippi River Valley, and the Gulf and East Coast. We also identified hotspots of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in coastal North Carolina. Slightly lower CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were observed between 2000-2007 in comparison to 2008-2020. Mean annual wetland carbon fluxes were 280 ± 38 Tg CO<sub>2</sub>-C for GPP, 233 ± 51 Tg CO<sub>2</sub>-C for RECO, - 20 ± 18 Tg CO<sub>2</sub>-C for NEE, and 5.7 ± 1.7 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>-C for CH<sub>4</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results provide regional estimates of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes that improve carbon budget assessments and support future wetland management in the SE US. By identifying the spatial and temporal variability of carbon uptake and emissions across the region, this study provides a foundation for improving regional carbon accounting and informing wetland conservation and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Processes\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653873/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ensemble machine learning-based scaling up of wetland carbon dynamics across the Southeastern U.S.

Background: Although the Southeastern United States (SE US) has been identified as a major terrestrial carbon sink, the balance of CO2 and CH4 fluxes from its wetlands remains poorly constrained due to strong environmental heterogeneity and limited regional-scale assessments. In this study, we used observations from 24 wetland sites located in the SE US, including freshwater and salt marshes, to train machine learning models (Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, Artificial Neural Network, and Partial Least Squares Regression) to predict monthly mean gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (RECO), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and methane (CH4) fluxes.

Results: Model performance measured in r 2 for GPP ranged from 0.60 to 0.70, for RECO ranged from 0.44 to 0.56, for NEE ranged from 0.45 to 0.56, and for CH4 flux ranged from 0.33 to 0.37. Random Forest and XGBoost were the most consistent algorithms between fluxes. Feature importance analyses of these two algorithms indicated that CO2 flux predictions were primarily associated with vegetation and climatic variables, whereas CH4 predictions were more strongly associated with soil and hydrological properties. Using a performance-weighted multi-model ensemble (MME), we scaled up the predictions for the entire SE US from 2000 to 2020. Spatial patterns of productivity and respiration showed flux hotspots in the Everglades, the Mississippi River Valley, and the Gulf and East Coast. We also identified hotspots of CH4 emissions in coastal North Carolina. Slightly lower CH4 fluxes were observed between 2000-2007 in comparison to 2008-2020. Mean annual wetland carbon fluxes were 280 ± 38 Tg CO2-C for GPP, 233 ± 51 Tg CO2-C for RECO, - 20 ± 18 Tg CO2-C for NEE, and 5.7 ± 1.7 Tg CH4-C for CH4.

Conclusions: Our results provide regional estimates of CO2 and CH4 fluxes that improve carbon budget assessments and support future wetland management in the SE US. By identifying the spatial and temporal variability of carbon uptake and emissions across the region, this study provides a foundation for improving regional carbon accounting and informing wetland conservation and management strategies.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-026-00755-9.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Processes
Ecological Processes Environmental Science-Ecological Modeling
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecological Processes is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal devoted to quality publications in ecological studies with a focus on the underlying processes responsible for the dynamics and functions of ecological systems at multiple spatial and temporal scales. The journal welcomes manuscripts on techniques, approaches, concepts, models, reviews, syntheses, short communications and applied research for advancing our knowledge and capability toward sustainability of ecosystems and the environment. Integrations of ecological and socio-economic processes are strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书