{"title":"基于代理的柯伊伯带天体转移快速可达性评价","authors":"Linzhi Meng, Xingyu Zhou, Dong Qiao, Xiangyu Li","doi":"10.1007/s10509-026-04650-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid accessibility assessment is needed for Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs), because direct multiple-gravity-assist trajectory optimisation is too costly for screening large target populations. This study developed a surrogate-based method for rapid assessment of prescribed KBO transfers. High-fidelity multiple-gravity-assist trajectory optimisation with deep-space manoeuvres provided labels for a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model that predicted the deep-space-manoeuvre-only transfer objective and time of flight from target-state representations. Seven representations were compared, including orbital elements and Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical states sampled at fixed epochs. A multi-epoch Cartesian representation gave the most balanced performance across prediction and ranking tasks. Logarithmic target scaling improved prediction accuracy in the low-cost region, whereas uncertainty-guided adaptive sampling improved screening precision and recall at the tested 10% and 20% screening fractions. On an independent test set, GPR achieved a global mean absolute transfer-objective error of 0.673 km/s and a mean absolute time-of-flight error of 537.5 days. The mean absolute error was 0.133 km/s for cases whose validated transfer objective was below 1 km/s, and 0.245 km/s for cases selected by the surrogate as having a predicted transfer objective below the same threshold. The larger global mean reflected the sparse high-cost tail of the objective distribution. Applied to 2223 representative catalogue targets, the surrogate identified ten targets with the lowest predicted transfer objectives for subsequent multiple-gravity-assist and deep-space-manoeuvre validation. These results provide a rapid screening approach for the prescribed Earth–Jupiter–KBO transfer scenario.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"371 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surrogate-based rapid accessibility assessment of Kuiper Belt object transfers\",\"authors\":\"Linzhi Meng, Xingyu Zhou, Dong Qiao, Xiangyu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10509-026-04650-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Rapid accessibility assessment is needed for Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs), because direct multiple-gravity-assist trajectory optimisation is too costly for screening large target populations. This study developed a surrogate-based method for rapid assessment of prescribed KBO transfers. High-fidelity multiple-gravity-assist trajectory optimisation with deep-space manoeuvres provided labels for a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model that predicted the deep-space-manoeuvre-only transfer objective and time of flight from target-state representations. Seven representations were compared, including orbital elements and Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical states sampled at fixed epochs. A multi-epoch Cartesian representation gave the most balanced performance across prediction and ranking tasks. Logarithmic target scaling improved prediction accuracy in the low-cost region, whereas uncertainty-guided adaptive sampling improved screening precision and recall at the tested 10% and 20% screening fractions. On an independent test set, GPR achieved a global mean absolute transfer-objective error of 0.673 km/s and a mean absolute time-of-flight error of 537.5 days. The mean absolute error was 0.133 km/s for cases whose validated transfer objective was below 1 km/s, and 0.245 km/s for cases selected by the surrogate as having a predicted transfer objective below the same threshold. The larger global mean reflected the sparse high-cost tail of the objective distribution. Applied to 2223 representative catalogue targets, the surrogate identified ten targets with the lowest predicted transfer objectives for subsequent multiple-gravity-assist and deep-space-manoeuvre validation. These results provide a rapid screening approach for the prescribed Earth–Jupiter–KBO transfer scenario.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"371 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-026-04650-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-026-04650-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surrogate-based rapid accessibility assessment of Kuiper Belt object transfers
Rapid accessibility assessment is needed for Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs), because direct multiple-gravity-assist trajectory optimisation is too costly for screening large target populations. This study developed a surrogate-based method for rapid assessment of prescribed KBO transfers. High-fidelity multiple-gravity-assist trajectory optimisation with deep-space manoeuvres provided labels for a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model that predicted the deep-space-manoeuvre-only transfer objective and time of flight from target-state representations. Seven representations were compared, including orbital elements and Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical states sampled at fixed epochs. A multi-epoch Cartesian representation gave the most balanced performance across prediction and ranking tasks. Logarithmic target scaling improved prediction accuracy in the low-cost region, whereas uncertainty-guided adaptive sampling improved screening precision and recall at the tested 10% and 20% screening fractions. On an independent test set, GPR achieved a global mean absolute transfer-objective error of 0.673 km/s and a mean absolute time-of-flight error of 537.5 days. The mean absolute error was 0.133 km/s for cases whose validated transfer objective was below 1 km/s, and 0.245 km/s for cases selected by the surrogate as having a predicted transfer objective below the same threshold. The larger global mean reflected the sparse high-cost tail of the objective distribution. Applied to 2223 representative catalogue targets, the surrogate identified ten targets with the lowest predicted transfer objectives for subsequent multiple-gravity-assist and deep-space-manoeuvre validation. These results provide a rapid screening approach for the prescribed Earth–Jupiter–KBO transfer scenario.
期刊介绍:
Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered.
The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing.
Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.