沙丘和峡谷中的蜥蜴:栖息地结构和组合模式

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-09-27 DOI:10.1111/aec.70293
Christina Paizis, Jules E. Farquhar, Katherine Moseby, Bob B. M. Wong, Alexandra J. R. Carthey, David G. Chapple
{"title":"沙丘和峡谷中的蜥蜴:栖息地结构和组合模式","authors":"Christina Paizis,&nbsp;Jules E. Farquhar,&nbsp;Katherine Moseby,&nbsp;Bob B. M. Wong,&nbsp;Alexandra J. R. Carthey,&nbsp;David G. Chapple","doi":"10.1111/aec.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Habitat structure mediates thermoregulation, foraging opportunities, and access to refugia, shaping how animals use space and encounter risk. Dune–swale mosaics provide sharp structural contrasts over short distances, offering a natural test of structure–assemblage links and spacing relative to shelter. We compared lizard assemblages and the positions of active lizards relative to vegetative cover across interdunal swales and adjacent sand dunes in central South Australia. At replicated sites in Arid Recovery Reserve and Andamooka Pastoral Station, we quantified vegetation and ground-layer structure, sampled assemblages with pitfall traps and active searches, and measured each active lizard's distance to the nearest vegetative refuge. We tested whether the expected structural contrast between dunes and swales was evident at our study sites, whether lizard community composition and assemblage metrics differed between landforms, and whether active lizards in structurally simpler habitat occurred closer to vegetative cover than those in more complex habitat. Dunes were more structurally complex than swales, lizard communities differed significantly between landforms, and abundance was higher on dunes, whereas richness and diversity were broadly comparable. However, active lizards in both landforms occurred at similar distances to vegetative cover. These findings identify habitat structure as a key driver of assemblage differences, while showing that we did not detect a significant habitat-level difference in active lizards' distance to vegetative cover under the present sampling design. We interpret implications for predation risk broadly in a multi-predator context and recommend coupling behavioural metrics with predator-activity indices and repeating sampling across wet and dry years.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70293","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lizards in Dunes and Swales: Habitat Structure and Assemblage Patterns\",\"authors\":\"Christina Paizis,&nbsp;Jules E. Farquhar,&nbsp;Katherine Moseby,&nbsp;Bob B. M. Wong,&nbsp;Alexandra J. R. Carthey,&nbsp;David G. Chapple\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Habitat structure mediates thermoregulation, foraging opportunities, and access to refugia, shaping how animals use space and encounter risk. Dune–swale mosaics provide sharp structural contrasts over short distances, offering a natural test of structure–assemblage links and spacing relative to shelter. We compared lizard assemblages and the positions of active lizards relative to vegetative cover across interdunal swales and adjacent sand dunes in central South Australia. At replicated sites in Arid Recovery Reserve and Andamooka Pastoral Station, we quantified vegetation and ground-layer structure, sampled assemblages with pitfall traps and active searches, and measured each active lizard's distance to the nearest vegetative refuge. We tested whether the expected structural contrast between dunes and swales was evident at our study sites, whether lizard community composition and assemblage metrics differed between landforms, and whether active lizards in structurally simpler habitat occurred closer to vegetative cover than those in more complex habitat. Dunes were more structurally complex than swales, lizard communities differed significantly between landforms, and abundance was higher on dunes, whereas richness and diversity were broadly comparable. However, active lizards in both landforms occurred at similar distances to vegetative cover. These findings identify habitat structure as a key driver of assemblage differences, while showing that we did not detect a significant habitat-level difference in active lizards' distance to vegetative cover under the present sampling design. We interpret implications for predation risk broadly in a multi-predator context and recommend coupling behavioural metrics with predator-activity indices and repeating sampling across wet and dry years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"51 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70293\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

栖息地结构调节体温调节、觅食机会和获得避难所,塑造动物如何利用空间和遇到风险。沙丘马赛克在短距离内提供了鲜明的结构对比,提供了对结构组合联系和相对于庇护所的间距的自然测试。我们比较了南澳大利亚中部的沙蜥组合和活动沙蜥相对于植被覆盖的位置。在干旱恢复保护区和Andamooka牧区站的复制地点,我们量化了植被和地面层结构,用陷阱和主动搜索取样了组合,并测量了每只活动蜥蜴到最近的植物避难所的距离。我们测试了沙丘和洼地之间的预期结构差异是否明显,蜥蜴群落组成和组合指标是否因地形而异,以及结构简单栖息地的活跃蜥蜴是否比结构复杂栖息地的活跃蜥蜴更接近植被覆盖。沙丘比洼地结构更复杂,不同地形的蜥蜴群落差异显著,沙丘上的蜥蜴丰度更高,而丰富度和多样性具有广泛的可比性。然而,在这两种地形中,活跃的蜥蜴都出现在与植被覆盖的距离相似的地方。这些发现表明栖息地结构是组合差异的关键驱动因素,同时表明在目前的采样设计下,我们没有发现活动蜥蜴与植被覆盖距离的显著栖息地水平差异。我们广泛地解释了多捕食者背景下捕食风险的含义,并建议将行为指标与捕食者活动指数相结合,并在干湿年份重复采样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lizards in Dunes and Swales: Habitat Structure and Assemblage Patterns

Habitat structure mediates thermoregulation, foraging opportunities, and access to refugia, shaping how animals use space and encounter risk. Dune–swale mosaics provide sharp structural contrasts over short distances, offering a natural test of structure–assemblage links and spacing relative to shelter. We compared lizard assemblages and the positions of active lizards relative to vegetative cover across interdunal swales and adjacent sand dunes in central South Australia. At replicated sites in Arid Recovery Reserve and Andamooka Pastoral Station, we quantified vegetation and ground-layer structure, sampled assemblages with pitfall traps and active searches, and measured each active lizard's distance to the nearest vegetative refuge. We tested whether the expected structural contrast between dunes and swales was evident at our study sites, whether lizard community composition and assemblage metrics differed between landforms, and whether active lizards in structurally simpler habitat occurred closer to vegetative cover than those in more complex habitat. Dunes were more structurally complex than swales, lizard communities differed significantly between landforms, and abundance was higher on dunes, whereas richness and diversity were broadly comparable. However, active lizards in both landforms occurred at similar distances to vegetative cover. These findings identify habitat structure as a key driver of assemblage differences, while showing that we did not detect a significant habitat-level difference in active lizards' distance to vegetative cover under the present sampling design. We interpret implications for predation risk broadly in a multi-predator context and recommend coupling behavioural metrics with predator-activity indices and repeating sampling across wet and dry years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书