Christina Paizis, Jules E. Farquhar, Katherine Moseby, Bob B. M. Wong, Alexandra J. R. Carthey, David G. Chapple
{"title":"沙丘和峡谷中的蜥蜴:栖息地结构和组合模式","authors":"Christina Paizis, Jules E. Farquhar, Katherine Moseby, Bob B. M. Wong, Alexandra J. R. Carthey, David G. Chapple","doi":"10.1111/aec.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Habitat structure mediates thermoregulation, foraging opportunities, and access to refugia, shaping how animals use space and encounter risk. Dune–swale mosaics provide sharp structural contrasts over short distances, offering a natural test of structure–assemblage links and spacing relative to shelter. We compared lizard assemblages and the positions of active lizards relative to vegetative cover across interdunal swales and adjacent sand dunes in central South Australia. At replicated sites in Arid Recovery Reserve and Andamooka Pastoral Station, we quantified vegetation and ground-layer structure, sampled assemblages with pitfall traps and active searches, and measured each active lizard's distance to the nearest vegetative refuge. We tested whether the expected structural contrast between dunes and swales was evident at our study sites, whether lizard community composition and assemblage metrics differed between landforms, and whether active lizards in structurally simpler habitat occurred closer to vegetative cover than those in more complex habitat. Dunes were more structurally complex than swales, lizard communities differed significantly between landforms, and abundance was higher on dunes, whereas richness and diversity were broadly comparable. However, active lizards in both landforms occurred at similar distances to vegetative cover. These findings identify habitat structure as a key driver of assemblage differences, while showing that we did not detect a significant habitat-level difference in active lizards' distance to vegetative cover under the present sampling design. We interpret implications for predation risk broadly in a multi-predator context and recommend coupling behavioural metrics with predator-activity indices and repeating sampling across wet and dry years.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70293","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lizards in Dunes and Swales: Habitat Structure and Assemblage Patterns\",\"authors\":\"Christina Paizis, Jules E. Farquhar, Katherine Moseby, Bob B. M. Wong, Alexandra J. R. Carthey, David G. Chapple\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Habitat structure mediates thermoregulation, foraging opportunities, and access to refugia, shaping how animals use space and encounter risk. Dune–swale mosaics provide sharp structural contrasts over short distances, offering a natural test of structure–assemblage links and spacing relative to shelter. We compared lizard assemblages and the positions of active lizards relative to vegetative cover across interdunal swales and adjacent sand dunes in central South Australia. At replicated sites in Arid Recovery Reserve and Andamooka Pastoral Station, we quantified vegetation and ground-layer structure, sampled assemblages with pitfall traps and active searches, and measured each active lizard's distance to the nearest vegetative refuge. We tested whether the expected structural contrast between dunes and swales was evident at our study sites, whether lizard community composition and assemblage metrics differed between landforms, and whether active lizards in structurally simpler habitat occurred closer to vegetative cover than those in more complex habitat. Dunes were more structurally complex than swales, lizard communities differed significantly between landforms, and abundance was higher on dunes, whereas richness and diversity were broadly comparable. However, active lizards in both landforms occurred at similar distances to vegetative cover. These findings identify habitat structure as a key driver of assemblage differences, while showing that we did not detect a significant habitat-level difference in active lizards' distance to vegetative cover under the present sampling design. We interpret implications for predation risk broadly in a multi-predator context and recommend coupling behavioural metrics with predator-activity indices and repeating sampling across wet and dry years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"51 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70293\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lizards in Dunes and Swales: Habitat Structure and Assemblage Patterns
Habitat structure mediates thermoregulation, foraging opportunities, and access to refugia, shaping how animals use space and encounter risk. Dune–swale mosaics provide sharp structural contrasts over short distances, offering a natural test of structure–assemblage links and spacing relative to shelter. We compared lizard assemblages and the positions of active lizards relative to vegetative cover across interdunal swales and adjacent sand dunes in central South Australia. At replicated sites in Arid Recovery Reserve and Andamooka Pastoral Station, we quantified vegetation and ground-layer structure, sampled assemblages with pitfall traps and active searches, and measured each active lizard's distance to the nearest vegetative refuge. We tested whether the expected structural contrast between dunes and swales was evident at our study sites, whether lizard community composition and assemblage metrics differed between landforms, and whether active lizards in structurally simpler habitat occurred closer to vegetative cover than those in more complex habitat. Dunes were more structurally complex than swales, lizard communities differed significantly between landforms, and abundance was higher on dunes, whereas richness and diversity were broadly comparable. However, active lizards in both landforms occurred at similar distances to vegetative cover. These findings identify habitat structure as a key driver of assemblage differences, while showing that we did not detect a significant habitat-level difference in active lizards' distance to vegetative cover under the present sampling design. We interpret implications for predation risk broadly in a multi-predator context and recommend coupling behavioural metrics with predator-activity indices and repeating sampling across wet and dry years.
期刊介绍:
Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere.
Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region.
Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.