关于虚假广告的概念：对Theodore C. Chan和Gary M. Vilke就我们的文章“在实验室中研究窒息：实验证据在死因调查中的作用”所写的信的答复。

IF 1 3区哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Pub Date : 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s40656-026-00762-1

Enno Fischer, Saana Jukola

{"title":"关于虚假广告的概念：对Theodore C. Chan和Gary M. Vilke就我们的文章“在实验室中研究窒息：实验证据在死因调查中的作用”所写的信的答复。","authors":"Enno Fischer, Saana Jukola","doi":"10.1007/s40656-026-00762-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theodore Chan and Gary Vilke criticize our arguments concerning a series of lab-based studies on asphyxiation. In this reply to their letter, we explain that Chan and Vilke's letter misrepresents our arguments in several important ways. We also clarify the notion of false advertising that we employed in our initial analysis and explain why some of the studies regarding asphyxiation represent instances of this problematic practice.","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13612642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the notion of false advertising: A reply to the letter by Theodore C. Chan and Gary M. Vilke on our article \\\"Studying asphyxiation in the lab: the role of experimental evidence in cause-of-death inquiry\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Enno Fischer, Saana Jukola\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40656-026-00762-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theodore Chan and Gary Vilke criticize our arguments concerning a series of lab-based studies on asphyxiation. In this reply to their letter, we explain that Chan and Vilke's letter misrepresents our arguments in several important ways. We also clarify the notion of false advertising that we employed in our initial analysis and explain why some of the studies regarding asphyxiation represent instances of this problematic practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13612642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00762-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00762-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On the notion of false advertising: A reply to the letter by Theodore C. Chan and Gary M. Vilke on our article "Studying asphyxiation in the lab: the role of experimental evidence in cause-of-death inquiry".

Theodore Chan and Gary Vilke criticize our arguments concerning a series of lab-based studies on asphyxiation. In this reply to their letter, we explain that Chan and Vilke's letter misrepresents our arguments in several important ways. We also clarify the notion of false advertising that we employed in our initial analysis and explain why some of the studies regarding asphyxiation represent instances of this problematic practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

5.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).