新热带旱地农业景观对鸟类功能多样性的影响

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-09-17 DOI:10.1111/aec.70292
Mônica da Costa Lima, Thiago Nascimento Zanetti, Helder Farias Pereira de Araujo
{"title":"新热带旱地农业景观对鸟类功能多样性的影响","authors":"Mônica da Costa Lima,&nbsp;Thiago Nascimento Zanetti,&nbsp;Helder Farias Pereira de Araujo","doi":"10.1111/aec.70292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The challenges of sustaining biodiversity underscore the management of agricultural landscapes, particularly in regions facing historical land-use challenges. Little is known about the effects of landscape on functional diversity in the tropics, which metrics of functional diversity are influenced by landscape and how they lead to changes in ecosystem function. We investigated the impact of landscape on avifaunal functional diversity in the Caatinga, the Brazilian drylands. We examined the relationship between landscape attributes, specifically complexity, composition and configuration—on the functional diversity, richness and evenness of birds. Field data encompassing avifauna across 30 plots alongside functional traits including body mass, foraging strata and diet of 176 bird species were collected within the study area. Our findings reveal that landscape complexity and configuration shaped overall avifauna functional diversity (FD), with complexity also driving functional richness (FRic) and configuration driving functional evenness (FEve), while landscape composition did not affect these community-level indices. However, composition was significantly linked to specific functional traits, particularly foraging strata (ground, understory and mid-high), whereas complexity was associated with diet-related traits (vertebrate consumption, nectarivory) and body mass; configuration showed no significant relationship with individual traits. Traits such as insectivory and understory use predominated in areas retaining natural cover, whereas terrestrial foraging and granivory were more common in croplands and degraded zones. These results indicate that landscape complexity and composition act as complementary, rather than redundant, filters shaping avifaunal functional diversity and associated ecosystem services, including pollination, seed dispersal and pest control.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70292","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Agricultural Landscape on the Functional Diversity of Bird Species in the Neotropical Dryland\",\"authors\":\"Mônica da Costa Lima,&nbsp;Thiago Nascimento Zanetti,&nbsp;Helder Farias Pereira de Araujo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The challenges of sustaining biodiversity underscore the management of agricultural landscapes, particularly in regions facing historical land-use challenges. Little is known about the effects of landscape on functional diversity in the tropics, which metrics of functional diversity are influenced by landscape and how they lead to changes in ecosystem function. We investigated the impact of landscape on avifaunal functional diversity in the Caatinga, the Brazilian drylands. We examined the relationship between landscape attributes, specifically complexity, composition and configuration—on the functional diversity, richness and evenness of birds. Field data encompassing avifauna across 30 plots alongside functional traits including body mass, foraging strata and diet of 176 bird species were collected within the study area. Our findings reveal that landscape complexity and configuration shaped overall avifauna functional diversity (FD), with complexity also driving functional richness (FRic) and configuration driving functional evenness (FEve), while landscape composition did not affect these community-level indices. However, composition was significantly linked to specific functional traits, particularly foraging strata (ground, understory and mid-high), whereas complexity was associated with diet-related traits (vertebrate consumption, nectarivory) and body mass; configuration showed no significant relationship with individual traits. Traits such as insectivory and understory use predominated in areas retaining natural cover, whereas terrestrial foraging and granivory were more common in croplands and degraded zones. These results indicate that landscape complexity and composition act as complementary, rather than redundant, filters shaping avifaunal functional diversity and associated ecosystem services, including pollination, seed dispersal and pest control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"51 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70292\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维持生物多样性的挑战强调了农业景观的管理,特别是在面临历史土地利用挑战的地区。景观对热带地区功能多样性的影响尚不清楚,功能多样性的哪些指标受到景观的影响,以及它们如何导致生态系统功能的变化。研究了景观对巴西卡廷加旱地鸟类功能多样性的影响。研究了景观属性(特别是复杂性、组成和配置)与鸟类功能多样性、丰富度和均匀度之间的关系。野外数据包括30个样地的鸟类种群以及176种鸟类的功能特征,包括体重、觅食层和饮食。结果表明,景观复杂性和景观配置决定了鸟类群落整体功能多样性(FD),而景观组成对功能丰富度(FRic)和功能均匀度(FEve)均无影响。然而,组成与特定的功能性状显著相关,特别是觅食层(地面、林下和中高层),而复杂性与饮食相关性状(脊椎动物消耗、食糖)和体重相关;构型与个体性状无显著相关。在保留自然覆盖物的地区,昆虫和林下利用等特征占主导地位,而在农田和退化地区,陆地觅食和花岗岩更为常见。这些结果表明,景观的复杂性和组成是形成鸟类功能多样性和相关生态系统服务(包括授粉、种子传播和害虫防治)的补充而非冗余过滤器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Agricultural Landscape on the Functional Diversity of Bird Species in the Neotropical Dryland

The challenges of sustaining biodiversity underscore the management of agricultural landscapes, particularly in regions facing historical land-use challenges. Little is known about the effects of landscape on functional diversity in the tropics, which metrics of functional diversity are influenced by landscape and how they lead to changes in ecosystem function. We investigated the impact of landscape on avifaunal functional diversity in the Caatinga, the Brazilian drylands. We examined the relationship between landscape attributes, specifically complexity, composition and configuration—on the functional diversity, richness and evenness of birds. Field data encompassing avifauna across 30 plots alongside functional traits including body mass, foraging strata and diet of 176 bird species were collected within the study area. Our findings reveal that landscape complexity and configuration shaped overall avifauna functional diversity (FD), with complexity also driving functional richness (FRic) and configuration driving functional evenness (FEve), while landscape composition did not affect these community-level indices. However, composition was significantly linked to specific functional traits, particularly foraging strata (ground, understory and mid-high), whereas complexity was associated with diet-related traits (vertebrate consumption, nectarivory) and body mass; configuration showed no significant relationship with individual traits. Traits such as insectivory and understory use predominated in areas retaining natural cover, whereas terrestrial foraging and granivory were more common in croplands and degraded zones. These results indicate that landscape complexity and composition act as complementary, rather than redundant, filters shaping avifaunal functional diversity and associated ecosystem services, including pollination, seed dispersal and pest control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书