中国零垃圾城市建设的政策协同及其影响因素分析

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jianling Jiao, Jie Wang, Jingjing Li
{"title":"中国零垃圾城市建设的政策协同及其影响因素分析","authors":"Jianling Jiao,&nbsp;Jie Wang,&nbsp;Jingjing Li","doi":"10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construction of a zero-waste city(ZWC) is a key strategy to address resource scarcity and achieve synergies in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, making an accurate assessment of inter-city policy synergy (ICPS) and its drivers urgent. We develop a policy synergy indicator (PSI) using text mining and complex network analysis, applying the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) model to examine the effects of political, economic, social, infrastructural, and geographic proximity factors on ICPS. We find that (1)ICPS varies substantially, with the strongest synergy observed between Shanghai and Tianjin, Ningbo, and Beijing, reaching values of 0.667, 0.665, and 0.604, respectively. Among the three key regions, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) exhibits the highest level at 0.299, while the Pan-Pearl River Delta (PPRD) shows the lowest at 0.247. (2) All five dimensions significantly influence ICPS, particularly for mandatory policies and large cities. The administrative hierarchy exerts the strongest effect, whereby a 1% increase raises ICPS by approximately 0.406%. (3)The mechanisms promoting ICPS differ regionally. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its periphery (BTH) rely primarily on administrative hierarchy and economic development, whereas the YRD and PPRD benefit from geographic proximity. These findings contribute to improving ICPS in the construction of ZWC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"28 5","pages":"4628 - 4640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of policy synergy and its influencing factors in the construction of zero-waste city in China\",\"authors\":\"Jianling Jiao,&nbsp;Jie Wang,&nbsp;Jingjing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The construction of a zero-waste city(ZWC) is a key strategy to address resource scarcity and achieve synergies in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, making an accurate assessment of inter-city policy synergy (ICPS) and its drivers urgent. We develop a policy synergy indicator (PSI) using text mining and complex network analysis, applying the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) model to examine the effects of political, economic, social, infrastructural, and geographic proximity factors on ICPS. We find that (1)ICPS varies substantially, with the strongest synergy observed between Shanghai and Tianjin, Ningbo, and Beijing, reaching values of 0.667, 0.665, and 0.604, respectively. Among the three key regions, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) exhibits the highest level at 0.299, while the Pan-Pearl River Delta (PPRD) shows the lowest at 0.247. (2) All five dimensions significantly influence ICPS, particularly for mandatory policies and large cities. The administrative hierarchy exerts the strongest effect, whereby a 1% increase raises ICPS by approximately 0.406%. (3)The mechanisms promoting ICPS differ regionally. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its periphery (BTH) rely primarily on administrative hierarchy and economic development, whereas the YRD and PPRD benefit from geographic proximity. These findings contribute to improving ICPS in the construction of ZWC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"4628 - 4640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建设零废物城市是解决资源短缺和实现污染减排协同效应的关键战略,准确评估城市间政策协同效应及其驱动因素迫在眉睫。我们利用文本挖掘和复杂网络分析开发了一个政策协同指标(PSI),并应用二次分配过程(QAP)模型来检验政治、经济、社会、基础设施和地理邻近因素对ICPS的影响。研究发现:(1)上海与天津、宁波和北京的协同效应最强,分别达到0.667、0.665和0.604。3个重点区域中,长江三角洲(YRD)水平最高,为0.299,泛珠三角(PPRD)最低,为0.247。(2)所有五个维度都显著影响ICPS,特别是对于强制性政策和大城市。行政等级制度的影响最大,每增加1%,ICPS就会提高约0.406%。(3)区域间ICPS促进机制存在差异。京津冀及其周边地区(BTH)主要依靠行政等级和经济发展,而长三角和珠三角则受益于地理邻近。这些研究结果有助于提高ZWC建设中的ICPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of policy synergy and its influencing factors in the construction of zero-waste city in China

The construction of a zero-waste city(ZWC) is a key strategy to address resource scarcity and achieve synergies in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, making an accurate assessment of inter-city policy synergy (ICPS) and its drivers urgent. We develop a policy synergy indicator (PSI) using text mining and complex network analysis, applying the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) model to examine the effects of political, economic, social, infrastructural, and geographic proximity factors on ICPS. We find that (1)ICPS varies substantially, with the strongest synergy observed between Shanghai and Tianjin, Ningbo, and Beijing, reaching values of 0.667, 0.665, and 0.604, respectively. Among the three key regions, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) exhibits the highest level at 0.299, while the Pan-Pearl River Delta (PPRD) shows the lowest at 0.247. (2) All five dimensions significantly influence ICPS, particularly for mandatory policies and large cities. The administrative hierarchy exerts the strongest effect, whereby a 1% increase raises ICPS by approximately 0.406%. (3)The mechanisms promoting ICPS differ regionally. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its periphery (BTH) rely primarily on administrative hierarchy and economic development, whereas the YRD and PPRD benefit from geographic proximity. These findings contribute to improving ICPS in the construction of ZWC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书