{"title":"中国零垃圾城市建设的政策协同及其影响因素分析","authors":"Jianling Jiao, Jie Wang, Jingjing Li","doi":"10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construction of a zero-waste city(ZWC) is a key strategy to address resource scarcity and achieve synergies in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, making an accurate assessment of inter-city policy synergy (ICPS) and its drivers urgent. We develop a policy synergy indicator (PSI) using text mining and complex network analysis, applying the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) model to examine the effects of political, economic, social, infrastructural, and geographic proximity factors on ICPS. We find that (1)ICPS varies substantially, with the strongest synergy observed between Shanghai and Tianjin, Ningbo, and Beijing, reaching values of 0.667, 0.665, and 0.604, respectively. Among the three key regions, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) exhibits the highest level at 0.299, while the Pan-Pearl River Delta (PPRD) shows the lowest at 0.247. (2) All five dimensions significantly influence ICPS, particularly for mandatory policies and large cities. The administrative hierarchy exerts the strongest effect, whereby a 1% increase raises ICPS by approximately 0.406%. (3)The mechanisms promoting ICPS differ regionally. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its periphery (BTH) rely primarily on administrative hierarchy and economic development, whereas the YRD and PPRD benefit from geographic proximity. These findings contribute to improving ICPS in the construction of ZWC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"28 5","pages":"4628 - 4640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of policy synergy and its influencing factors in the construction of zero-waste city in China\",\"authors\":\"Jianling Jiao, Jie Wang, Jingjing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The construction of a zero-waste city(ZWC) is a key strategy to address resource scarcity and achieve synergies in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, making an accurate assessment of inter-city policy synergy (ICPS) and its drivers urgent. We develop a policy synergy indicator (PSI) using text mining and complex network analysis, applying the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) model to examine the effects of political, economic, social, infrastructural, and geographic proximity factors on ICPS. We find that (1)ICPS varies substantially, with the strongest synergy observed between Shanghai and Tianjin, Ningbo, and Beijing, reaching values of 0.667, 0.665, and 0.604, respectively. Among the three key regions, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) exhibits the highest level at 0.299, while the Pan-Pearl River Delta (PPRD) shows the lowest at 0.247. (2) All five dimensions significantly influence ICPS, particularly for mandatory policies and large cities. The administrative hierarchy exerts the strongest effect, whereby a 1% increase raises ICPS by approximately 0.406%. (3)The mechanisms promoting ICPS differ regionally. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its periphery (BTH) rely primarily on administrative hierarchy and economic development, whereas the YRD and PPRD benefit from geographic proximity. These findings contribute to improving ICPS in the construction of ZWC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"4628 - 4640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-026-02701-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of policy synergy and its influencing factors in the construction of zero-waste city in China
The construction of a zero-waste city(ZWC) is a key strategy to address resource scarcity and achieve synergies in pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, making an accurate assessment of inter-city policy synergy (ICPS) and its drivers urgent. We develop a policy synergy indicator (PSI) using text mining and complex network analysis, applying the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) model to examine the effects of political, economic, social, infrastructural, and geographic proximity factors on ICPS. We find that (1)ICPS varies substantially, with the strongest synergy observed between Shanghai and Tianjin, Ningbo, and Beijing, reaching values of 0.667, 0.665, and 0.604, respectively. Among the three key regions, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) exhibits the highest level at 0.299, while the Pan-Pearl River Delta (PPRD) shows the lowest at 0.247. (2) All five dimensions significantly influence ICPS, particularly for mandatory policies and large cities. The administrative hierarchy exerts the strongest effect, whereby a 1% increase raises ICPS by approximately 0.406%. (3)The mechanisms promoting ICPS differ regionally. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its periphery (BTH) rely primarily on administrative hierarchy and economic development, whereas the YRD and PPRD benefit from geographic proximity. These findings contribute to improving ICPS in the construction of ZWC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles.
The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management.
The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).