{"title":"地形约束、生态单元和系统记忆。","authors":"Colby J Clark","doi":"10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most philosophers that study constraints consider them noncausal. But Ross (2023, 2024) posits an account that attributes causality to one category of constraint (i.e., \"causal constraints\"). In this essay, I extrapolate and add to Ross' account to argue that topographical features causally constrain complex ecological dynamics. Topographical features possess four defining characteristics that are common to all constraints and satisfy the two criteria to qualify as causal (on the interventionist account of causal explanation). I refer to these as topographical constraints. Furthermore, I suggest that the existence of topographical constraints compels a reimagination of the ecological unit question as it appears in the philosophy of ecology. The ecological unit question asks what method adequately delimits the boundaries of organizational units (e.g., populations, communities, ecosystems, etc.). I propose the topographical-ecological unit delimitation (TEUD). The TEUD is a novel method to integrate topographical constraints into descriptions of ecological units, which enhances understanding of both openness and historical contingency. Finally, I demonstrate how the TEUD is applicable to contemporary spatial resilience research that studies system memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topographical constraints, ecological units, and system memory.\",\"authors\":\"Colby J Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most philosophers that study constraints consider them noncausal. But Ross (2023, 2024) posits an account that attributes causality to one category of constraint (i.e., \\\"causal constraints\\\"). In this essay, I extrapolate and add to Ross' account to argue that topographical features causally constrain complex ecological dynamics. Topographical features possess four defining characteristics that are common to all constraints and satisfy the two criteria to qualify as causal (on the interventionist account of causal explanation). I refer to these as topographical constraints. Furthermore, I suggest that the existence of topographical constraints compels a reimagination of the ecological unit question as it appears in the philosophy of ecology. The ecological unit question asks what method adequately delimits the boundaries of organizational units (e.g., populations, communities, ecosystems, etc.). I propose the topographical-ecological unit delimitation (TEUD). The TEUD is a novel method to integrate topographical constraints into descriptions of ecological units, which enhances understanding of both openness and historical contingency. Finally, I demonstrate how the TEUD is applicable to contemporary spatial resilience research that studies system memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Topographical constraints, ecological units, and system memory.
Most philosophers that study constraints consider them noncausal. But Ross (2023, 2024) posits an account that attributes causality to one category of constraint (i.e., "causal constraints"). In this essay, I extrapolate and add to Ross' account to argue that topographical features causally constrain complex ecological dynamics. Topographical features possess four defining characteristics that are common to all constraints and satisfy the two criteria to qualify as causal (on the interventionist account of causal explanation). I refer to these as topographical constraints. Furthermore, I suggest that the existence of topographical constraints compels a reimagination of the ecological unit question as it appears in the philosophy of ecology. The ecological unit question asks what method adequately delimits the boundaries of organizational units (e.g., populations, communities, ecosystems, etc.). I propose the topographical-ecological unit delimitation (TEUD). The TEUD is a novel method to integrate topographical constraints into descriptions of ecological units, which enhances understanding of both openness and historical contingency. Finally, I demonstrate how the TEUD is applicable to contemporary spatial resilience research that studies system memory.
期刊介绍:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).