地形约束、生态单元和系统记忆。

IF 1 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Colby J Clark
{"title":"地形约束、生态单元和系统记忆。","authors":"Colby J Clark","doi":"10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most philosophers that study constraints consider them noncausal. But Ross (2023, 2024) posits an account that attributes causality to one category of constraint (i.e., \"causal constraints\"). In this essay, I extrapolate and add to Ross' account to argue that topographical features causally constrain complex ecological dynamics. Topographical features possess four defining characteristics that are common to all constraints and satisfy the two criteria to qualify as causal (on the interventionist account of causal explanation). I refer to these as topographical constraints. Furthermore, I suggest that the existence of topographical constraints compels a reimagination of the ecological unit question as it appears in the philosophy of ecology. The ecological unit question asks what method adequately delimits the boundaries of organizational units (e.g., populations, communities, ecosystems, etc.). I propose the topographical-ecological unit delimitation (TEUD). The TEUD is a novel method to integrate topographical constraints into descriptions of ecological units, which enhances understanding of both openness and historical contingency. Finally, I demonstrate how the TEUD is applicable to contemporary spatial resilience research that studies system memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topographical constraints, ecological units, and system memory.\",\"authors\":\"Colby J Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most philosophers that study constraints consider them noncausal. But Ross (2023, 2024) posits an account that attributes causality to one category of constraint (i.e., \\\"causal constraints\\\"). In this essay, I extrapolate and add to Ross' account to argue that topographical features causally constrain complex ecological dynamics. Topographical features possess four defining characteristics that are common to all constraints and satisfy the two criteria to qualify as causal (on the interventionist account of causal explanation). I refer to these as topographical constraints. Furthermore, I suggest that the existence of topographical constraints compels a reimagination of the ecological unit question as it appears in the philosophy of ecology. The ecological unit question asks what method adequately delimits the boundaries of organizational units (e.g., populations, communities, ecosystems, etc.). I propose the topographical-ecological unit delimitation (TEUD). The TEUD is a novel method to integrate topographical constraints into descriptions of ecological units, which enhances understanding of both openness and historical contingency. Finally, I demonstrate how the TEUD is applicable to contemporary spatial resilience research that studies system memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00761-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数研究约束的哲学家认为约束是非因果的。但是Ross(2023,2024)假设了一种将因果关系归因于一类约束(即“因果约束”)的解释。在这篇文章中,我推断并补充了罗斯的说法,认为地形特征因果地限制了复杂的生态动态。地形特征具有四个定义特征,这些特征对所有约束都是共同的,并且满足作为因果关系的两个标准(根据因果解释的干预主义解释)。我把这些称为地形限制。此外,我认为地形限制的存在迫使人们重新想象生态单位问题,就像它出现在生态学哲学中一样。生态单位问题问的是什么方法能充分划定组织单位的边界(例如,人口、社区、生态系统等)。我提出了地形生态单元划分(TEUD)。TEUD是一种将地形约束整合到生态单元描述中的新方法,它增强了对开放性和历史偶然性的理解。最后,我展示了TEUD如何适用于研究系统记忆的当代空间弹性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topographical constraints, ecological units, and system memory.

Most philosophers that study constraints consider them noncausal. But Ross (2023, 2024) posits an account that attributes causality to one category of constraint (i.e., "causal constraints"). In this essay, I extrapolate and add to Ross' account to argue that topographical features causally constrain complex ecological dynamics. Topographical features possess four defining characteristics that are common to all constraints and satisfy the two criteria to qualify as causal (on the interventionist account of causal explanation). I refer to these as topographical constraints. Furthermore, I suggest that the existence of topographical constraints compels a reimagination of the ecological unit question as it appears in the philosophy of ecology. The ecological unit question asks what method adequately delimits the boundaries of organizational units (e.g., populations, communities, ecosystems, etc.). I propose the topographical-ecological unit delimitation (TEUD). The TEUD is a novel method to integrate topographical constraints into descriptions of ecological units, which enhances understanding of both openness and historical contingency. Finally, I demonstrate how the TEUD is applicable to contemporary spatial resilience research that studies system memory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书