护士虐待老人评定量表的编制及心理测量学评价。

IF 1.2 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Oğuzhan Tiryaki, Birsel Canan Demirbağ
{"title":"护士虐待老人评定量表的编制及心理测量学评价。","authors":"Oğuzhan Tiryaki, Birsel Canan Demirbağ","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2026.2734948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a nurse-administered instrument for the structured assessment of indicators potentially associated with elder abuse. Scale items were generated through literature review and expert evaluation, yielding a content validity index of 0.878. Each nurse assessed one unique older adult. Exploratory factor analysis included 373 nurse-older adult dyads, and confirmatory factor analysis included 334 independent dyads, totaling 707 assessments. Older adults were required to communicate effectively and be clinically suitable for assessment; cognitive status was not formally measured. Exploratory analysis showed adequate sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.861) and a significant Bartlett's test (<i>p</i> < .001), identifying a four-factor structure explaining 61.81% of variance. Confirmatory analysis supported the proposed structure, and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.890 to 0.944. Diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated against an independent reference standard; therefore, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and clinically meaningful cutoff scores remain to be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric evaluation of the nurses' elder abuse assessment scale.\",\"authors\":\"Oğuzhan Tiryaki, Birsel Canan Demirbağ\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08946566.2026.2734948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a nurse-administered instrument for the structured assessment of indicators potentially associated with elder abuse. Scale items were generated through literature review and expert evaluation, yielding a content validity index of 0.878. Each nurse assessed one unique older adult. Exploratory factor analysis included 373 nurse-older adult dyads, and confirmatory factor analysis included 334 independent dyads, totaling 707 assessments. Older adults were required to communicate effectively and be clinically suitable for assessment; cognitive status was not formally measured. Exploratory analysis showed adequate sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.861) and a significant Bartlett's test (<i>p</i> < .001), identifying a four-factor structure explaining 61.81% of variance. Confirmatory analysis supported the proposed structure, and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.890 to 0.944. Diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated against an independent reference standard; therefore, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and clinically meaningful cutoff scores remain to be established.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2026.2734948\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2026.2734948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在开发和评估一种护士管理的工具的心理测量特性,用于对可能与老年人虐待相关的指标进行结构化评估。经文献查阅和专家评价生成量表条目,内容效度指数为0.878。每个护士评估一个独特的老年人。探索性因素分析包括373对护士-老年人,验证性因素分析包括334对独立个体,共707个评估。老年人被要求进行有效的沟通,并在临床上适合进行评估;认知状态没有正式测量。探索性分析显示样本充分性充足(KMO = 0.861), Bartlett检验显著(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and psychometric evaluation of the nurses' elder abuse assessment scale.

This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a nurse-administered instrument for the structured assessment of indicators potentially associated with elder abuse. Scale items were generated through literature review and expert evaluation, yielding a content validity index of 0.878. Each nurse assessed one unique older adult. Exploratory factor analysis included 373 nurse-older adult dyads, and confirmatory factor analysis included 334 independent dyads, totaling 707 assessments. Older adults were required to communicate effectively and be clinically suitable for assessment; cognitive status was not formally measured. Exploratory analysis showed adequate sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.861) and a significant Bartlett's test (p < .001), identifying a four-factor structure explaining 61.81% of variance. Confirmatory analysis supported the proposed structure, and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.890 to 0.944. Diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated against an independent reference standard; therefore, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and clinically meaningful cutoff scores remain to be established.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书