Carley Vuillermin, Maria F Canizares, Patricia E Miller, Lindley B Wall, Suzanne E Steinman, Ann Van Heest
{"title":"多发性遗传性外生骨瘤累及前臂的分类:来自can研究组的共识。","authors":"Carley Vuillermin, Maria F Canizares, Patricia E Miller, Lindley B Wall, Suzanne E Steinman, Ann Van Heest","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.25.01593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing classifications for forearm deformity in multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) have demonstrated low interrater reliability and limited clinical applicability. Our primary research question was whether a Delphi consensus process could generate a more reliable and clinically useful classification for longitudinal surveillance of MHE-related forearm deformities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen pediatric hand surgeons from the Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CoULD) Study Group participated in 7 rounds of online Delphi surveys (June 2022 to September 2023). An investigator team facilitated the process with anonymized feedback. Round 1 identified key clinical and radiographic features. Subsequent rounds refined these features, determined categorical structure, and piloted the system with representative radiographs. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. After final consensus, interrater reliability was tested by 4 independent surgeons who classified 101 radiographs from 67 patients with forearm MHE. Reliability was assessed with kappa and concordance coefficients and compared with the Masada, Gottschalk, and Jo classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Delphi process identified radiographic predictors that included ulnar variance, the radial articular angle (RAA), radial head alignment, and osteochondroma size. Consensus favored a 3-tier classification: Type 1, mild; Type 2, moderate; and Type 3, severe. Closing consensus was achieved, with 93% agreement. Reliability testing showed moderate agreement on the first reading (kappa = 0.55), significantly higher than for the Masada (kappa = 0.21 [original classification], kappa = 0.35 [modified version]), Gottschalk (kappa = 0.43), and Jo (kappa = 0.43) classifications. After refinement that incorporated osteochondroma size and the radial head subtypes (3A, subluxation, and 3B, dislocation), agreement improved to substantial (kappa = 0.64) (p < 0.001), with high concordance (0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CoULD MHE Classification, developed through expert consensus, integrates validated radiographic predictors with defined thresholds. It demonstrated significantly improved reliability over prior systems and provides a practical framework for longitudinal monitoring of forearm deformities in patients with MHE.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Forearm Involvement in Multiple Hereditary Exostoses: Consensus from the CoULD Study Group.\",\"authors\":\"Carley Vuillermin, Maria F Canizares, Patricia E Miller, Lindley B Wall, Suzanne E Steinman, Ann Van Heest\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.25.01593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing classifications for forearm deformity in multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) have demonstrated low interrater reliability and limited clinical applicability. Our primary research question was whether a Delphi consensus process could generate a more reliable and clinically useful classification for longitudinal surveillance of MHE-related forearm deformities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen pediatric hand surgeons from the Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CoULD) Study Group participated in 7 rounds of online Delphi surveys (June 2022 to September 2023). An investigator team facilitated the process with anonymized feedback. Round 1 identified key clinical and radiographic features. Subsequent rounds refined these features, determined categorical structure, and piloted the system with representative radiographs. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. After final consensus, interrater reliability was tested by 4 independent surgeons who classified 101 radiographs from 67 patients with forearm MHE. Reliability was assessed with kappa and concordance coefficients and compared with the Masada, Gottschalk, and Jo classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Delphi process identified radiographic predictors that included ulnar variance, the radial articular angle (RAA), radial head alignment, and osteochondroma size. Consensus favored a 3-tier classification: Type 1, mild; Type 2, moderate; and Type 3, severe. Closing consensus was achieved, with 93% agreement. Reliability testing showed moderate agreement on the first reading (kappa = 0.55), significantly higher than for the Masada (kappa = 0.21 [original classification], kappa = 0.35 [modified version]), Gottschalk (kappa = 0.43), and Jo (kappa = 0.43) classifications. After refinement that incorporated osteochondroma size and the radial head subtypes (3A, subluxation, and 3B, dislocation), agreement improved to substantial (kappa = 0.64) (p < 0.001), with high concordance (0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CoULD MHE Classification, developed through expert consensus, integrates validated radiographic predictors with defined thresholds. It demonstrated significantly improved reliability over prior systems and provides a practical framework for longitudinal monitoring of forearm deformities in patients with MHE.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.25.01593\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.25.01593","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classification of Forearm Involvement in Multiple Hereditary Exostoses: Consensus from the CoULD Study Group.
Background: Existing classifications for forearm deformity in multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) have demonstrated low interrater reliability and limited clinical applicability. Our primary research question was whether a Delphi consensus process could generate a more reliable and clinically useful classification for longitudinal surveillance of MHE-related forearm deformities.
Methods: Fifteen pediatric hand surgeons from the Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CoULD) Study Group participated in 7 rounds of online Delphi surveys (June 2022 to September 2023). An investigator team facilitated the process with anonymized feedback. Round 1 identified key clinical and radiographic features. Subsequent rounds refined these features, determined categorical structure, and piloted the system with representative radiographs. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. After final consensus, interrater reliability was tested by 4 independent surgeons who classified 101 radiographs from 67 patients with forearm MHE. Reliability was assessed with kappa and concordance coefficients and compared with the Masada, Gottschalk, and Jo classifications.
Results: The Delphi process identified radiographic predictors that included ulnar variance, the radial articular angle (RAA), radial head alignment, and osteochondroma size. Consensus favored a 3-tier classification: Type 1, mild; Type 2, moderate; and Type 3, severe. Closing consensus was achieved, with 93% agreement. Reliability testing showed moderate agreement on the first reading (kappa = 0.55), significantly higher than for the Masada (kappa = 0.21 [original classification], kappa = 0.35 [modified version]), Gottschalk (kappa = 0.43), and Jo (kappa = 0.43) classifications. After refinement that incorporated osteochondroma size and the radial head subtypes (3A, subluxation, and 3B, dislocation), agreement improved to substantial (kappa = 0.64) (p < 0.001), with high concordance (0.82).
Conclusions: The CoULD MHE Classification, developed through expert consensus, integrates validated radiographic predictors with defined thresholds. It demonstrated significantly improved reliability over prior systems and provides a practical framework for longitudinal monitoring of forearm deformities in patients with MHE.
Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.