{"title":"用于优化水驱的先进机器学习方法:专注于注入-生产动态","authors":"Samuel Nashed, Oluchi Ejehu, Rouzbeh Moghanloo","doi":"10.1016/j.ptlrs.2026.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Waterflooding persists as the primary secondary oil recovery method, although its efficiency evaluation is often hindered by limitations from reservoir heterogeneities alongside non-uniform sweep efficiency and uncertainty in predicting well-to-well connectivity. To improve the evaluation of waterflooding, this research develops and validates nine advanced machine learning models, covering key types such as neural networks, linear models, tree-based models, ensemble learning, and support vector machines. This research utilized a dataset of 6592 observations collected across four wells over 2000 days to train and evaluate these machine learning models for fluid production rate forecasting and injector-producer connectivity assessments. The most successful model was AdaBoost since it delivered both a minimum root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.004 and a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.99, surpassing traditional methods. Furthermore, SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis provided interpretability by quantifying injection wells’ relative influence on production rates, facilitating the construction of a connectivity-driven contour map. Traditional evaluation methods of empirical and analytical approaches, as well as capacitance-resistance models and numerical simulators, function under restrictive assumptions, extensive computational requirements, and significant data demands. This study is novel in uniting multiple ML algorithms with SHAP interpretability and a connectivity-driven contour map for injector–producer dynamics, providing a practical, real-time workflow for field-scale waterflood optimization. The results of this study demonstrate that ML models surpass traditional methods in terms of predictive accuracy, computer processing speed, and scalability when applied for real-time waterflood optimization. This study illustrates the transformative potential of ML in reservoir engineering by enabling data-driven decision-making and improving the injection optimization process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19756,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Research","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 827-837"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced machine learning approaches for optimizing waterflooding: A focus on injector-producer dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Nashed, Oluchi Ejehu, Rouzbeh Moghanloo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptlrs.2026.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Waterflooding persists as the primary secondary oil recovery method, although its efficiency evaluation is often hindered by limitations from reservoir heterogeneities alongside non-uniform sweep efficiency and uncertainty in predicting well-to-well connectivity. To improve the evaluation of waterflooding, this research develops and validates nine advanced machine learning models, covering key types such as neural networks, linear models, tree-based models, ensemble learning, and support vector machines. This research utilized a dataset of 6592 observations collected across four wells over 2000 days to train and evaluate these machine learning models for fluid production rate forecasting and injector-producer connectivity assessments. The most successful model was AdaBoost since it delivered both a minimum root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.004 and a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.99, surpassing traditional methods. Furthermore, SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis provided interpretability by quantifying injection wells’ relative influence on production rates, facilitating the construction of a connectivity-driven contour map. Traditional evaluation methods of empirical and analytical approaches, as well as capacitance-resistance models and numerical simulators, function under restrictive assumptions, extensive computational requirements, and significant data demands. This study is novel in uniting multiple ML algorithms with SHAP interpretability and a connectivity-driven contour map for injector–producer dynamics, providing a practical, real-time workflow for field-scale waterflood optimization. The results of this study demonstrate that ML models surpass traditional methods in terms of predictive accuracy, computer processing speed, and scalability when applied for real-time waterflood optimization. This study illustrates the transformative potential of ML in reservoir engineering by enabling data-driven decision-making and improving the injection optimization process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Research\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 827-837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249526000013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249526000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advanced machine learning approaches for optimizing waterflooding: A focus on injector-producer dynamics
Waterflooding persists as the primary secondary oil recovery method, although its efficiency evaluation is often hindered by limitations from reservoir heterogeneities alongside non-uniform sweep efficiency and uncertainty in predicting well-to-well connectivity. To improve the evaluation of waterflooding, this research develops and validates nine advanced machine learning models, covering key types such as neural networks, linear models, tree-based models, ensemble learning, and support vector machines. This research utilized a dataset of 6592 observations collected across four wells over 2000 days to train and evaluate these machine learning models for fluid production rate forecasting and injector-producer connectivity assessments. The most successful model was AdaBoost since it delivered both a minimum root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.004 and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.99, surpassing traditional methods. Furthermore, SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis provided interpretability by quantifying injection wells’ relative influence on production rates, facilitating the construction of a connectivity-driven contour map. Traditional evaluation methods of empirical and analytical approaches, as well as capacitance-resistance models and numerical simulators, function under restrictive assumptions, extensive computational requirements, and significant data demands. This study is novel in uniting multiple ML algorithms with SHAP interpretability and a connectivity-driven contour map for injector–producer dynamics, providing a practical, real-time workflow for field-scale waterflood optimization. The results of this study demonstrate that ML models surpass traditional methods in terms of predictive accuracy, computer processing speed, and scalability when applied for real-time waterflood optimization. This study illustrates the transformative potential of ML in reservoir engineering by enabling data-driven decision-making and improving the injection optimization process.