污名化与系统性不信任:中国长期照护机构虐待老人社会媒体话语的多维情感分析。

IF 1.2 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Xiang Gao, Shirui Liu, Fei Sun
{"title":"污名化与系统性不信任:中国长期照护机构虐待老人社会媒体话语的多维情感分析。","authors":"Xiang Gao, Shirui Liu, Fei Sun","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2026.2731356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyzed Weibo and Douyin comments posted during a five-day period surrounding a suspected elder abuse incident in a long-term care institution in mainland China. Of 51,776 comments collected, 41,362 remained after preprocessing. We used lexicon-based emotion classification, Baidu AI Cloud sentiment scoring, and TF-IDF and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to examine emotional, temporal, regional, and thematic patterns. Sentiment was predominantly negative (mean = -35.941). Among 4,305 classified comments, resentment was most frequent (n= 1,433, 33.29%), followed by confidence (n= 1,297, 30.13%), vengefulness (n= 659, 15.31%), fear (n= 538, 12.50%), and shame (n= 378, 8.78%). Higher provincial resident-to-direct care worker ratios were associated with more negative sentiment, although this ecological correlation does not establish causality. Recurring themes concerned prison-like images of institutional care, direct care worker stigmatization, regulatory oversight, vulnerability among people aging without children, and tensions surrounding family responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stigma and systemic distrust: a multidimensional sentiment analysis of social media discourse on elder abuse in Chinese long-term care institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Gao, Shirui Liu, Fei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08946566.2026.2731356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study analyzed Weibo and Douyin comments posted during a five-day period surrounding a suspected elder abuse incident in a long-term care institution in mainland China. Of 51,776 comments collected, 41,362 remained after preprocessing. We used lexicon-based emotion classification, Baidu AI Cloud sentiment scoring, and TF-IDF and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to examine emotional, temporal, regional, and thematic patterns. Sentiment was predominantly negative (mean = -35.941). Among 4,305 classified comments, resentment was most frequent (n= 1,433, 33.29%), followed by confidence (n= 1,297, 30.13%), vengefulness (n= 659, 15.31%), fear (n= 538, 12.50%), and shame (n= 378, 8.78%). Higher provincial resident-to-direct care worker ratios were associated with more negative sentiment, although this ecological correlation does not establish causality. Recurring themes concerned prison-like images of institutional care, direct care worker stigmatization, regulatory oversight, vulnerability among people aging without children, and tensions surrounding family responsibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2026.2731356\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2026.2731356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了中国大陆一家长期护理机构发生的一起疑似虐待老人事件的五天时间内,微博和抖音上的评论。在收集到的51,776条评论中,有41,362条经过预处理。我们使用基于词汇的情绪分类、b百度AI Cloud情绪评分、TF-IDF和潜在狄利克雷分配来检查情绪、时间、区域和主题模式。情绪主要是负面的(平均值= -35.941)。在4305条分类评论中,怨恨是最常见的(n= 1433, 33.29%),其次是自信(n= 1297, 30.13%)、报复(n= 659, 15.31%)、恐惧(n= 538, 12.50%)和羞耻(n= 378, 8.78%)。较高的省级居民与直接护理人员的比例与更多的负面情绪相关,尽管这种生态相关性并没有建立因果关系。反复出现的主题涉及监狱般的机构护理形象、直接护理人员的污名化、监管监督、无子女老年人的脆弱性以及围绕家庭责任的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stigma and systemic distrust: a multidimensional sentiment analysis of social media discourse on elder abuse in Chinese long-term care institutions.

This study analyzed Weibo and Douyin comments posted during a five-day period surrounding a suspected elder abuse incident in a long-term care institution in mainland China. Of 51,776 comments collected, 41,362 remained after preprocessing. We used lexicon-based emotion classification, Baidu AI Cloud sentiment scoring, and TF-IDF and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to examine emotional, temporal, regional, and thematic patterns. Sentiment was predominantly negative (mean = -35.941). Among 4,305 classified comments, resentment was most frequent (n= 1,433, 33.29%), followed by confidence (n= 1,297, 30.13%), vengefulness (n= 659, 15.31%), fear (n= 538, 12.50%), and shame (n= 378, 8.78%). Higher provincial resident-to-direct care worker ratios were associated with more negative sentiment, although this ecological correlation does not establish causality. Recurring themes concerned prison-like images of institutional care, direct care worker stigmatization, regulatory oversight, vulnerability among people aging without children, and tensions surrounding family responsibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书