通过块级可读区块链的可证明版本的云间审计

IF 5.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-30 DOI:10.1109/TCC.2026.3718964
Jingting Xue;Ximin Jing;Fagen Li;Peiling Wu;Wenzheng Zhang;Xiaojun Zhang;Yu Zhou
{"title":"通过块级可读区块链的可证明版本的云间审计","authors":"Jingting Xue;Ximin Jing;Fagen Li;Peiling Wu;Wenzheng Zhang;Xiaojun Zhang;Yu Zhou","doi":"10.1109/TCC.2026.3718964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a core infrastructure for data governance, trustworthy cloud storage demands secure and efficient auditing mechanisms, which are essential for unlocking data value.However, existing public auditing schemes suffer from critical limitations, including collusion risks introduced by third-party auditors, storage bloat due to the immutability of blockchain, and inefficiencies in version traceability. In this paper, we propose PVICA, a provable versioned inter-cloud auditing scheme to address these challenges. PVICA adopts a decentralized mutual auditing architecture across multiple clouds based on verifiable delay functions, which inherently prevent precomputation attacks and eliminate potential collusion between clouds or between a cloud and its auditor. To mitigate blockchain-induced storage overhead while ensuring controlled redactability, we design a block-level redactable blockchain with double-trapdoor keys control. By separating ephemeral and long-term trapdoor key authorities, PVICA reduces redundant outsourced logs and enables efficient audit updates. Moreover, we integrate RSA accumulators to achieve constant-time cross-version verification, thereby reconciling the conflict between audit log privacy and regulatory compliance. Formal security analysis demonstrates that PVICA achieves key guarantees such as storage correctness and tamper detection. Experimental results show that its block-level redacting mechanism significantly improves audit throughput over traditional approaches, highlighting its practicality for real-world deployment.","PeriodicalId":13202,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing","volume":"14 3","pages":"2086-2099"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provable Versioned Inter-Cloud Auditing via Block-Level Redactable Blockchain\",\"authors\":\"Jingting Xue;Ximin Jing;Fagen Li;Peiling Wu;Wenzheng Zhang;Xiaojun Zhang;Yu Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TCC.2026.3718964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a core infrastructure for data governance, trustworthy cloud storage demands secure and efficient auditing mechanisms, which are essential for unlocking data value.However, existing public auditing schemes suffer from critical limitations, including collusion risks introduced by third-party auditors, storage bloat due to the immutability of blockchain, and inefficiencies in version traceability. In this paper, we propose PVICA, a provable versioned inter-cloud auditing scheme to address these challenges. PVICA adopts a decentralized mutual auditing architecture across multiple clouds based on verifiable delay functions, which inherently prevent precomputation attacks and eliminate potential collusion between clouds or between a cloud and its auditor. To mitigate blockchain-induced storage overhead while ensuring controlled redactability, we design a block-level redactable blockchain with double-trapdoor keys control. By separating ephemeral and long-term trapdoor key authorities, PVICA reduces redundant outsourced logs and enables efficient audit updates. Moreover, we integrate RSA accumulators to achieve constant-time cross-version verification, thereby reconciling the conflict between audit log privacy and regulatory compliance. Formal security analysis demonstrates that PVICA achieves key guarantees such as storage correctness and tamper detection. Experimental results show that its block-level redacting mechanism significantly improves audit throughput over traditional approaches, highlighting its practicality for real-world deployment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"2086-2099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11631687/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11631687/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为数据治理的核心基础设施,值得信赖的云存储需要安全高效的审计机制,这对于释放数据价值至关重要。然而,现有的公共审计方案存在严重的局限性,包括第三方审计员引入的串通风险、区块链的不变性导致的存储膨胀,以及版本可追溯性的低效率。在本文中,我们提出了PVICA,一种可证明的版本化云间审计方案来解决这些挑战。PVICA采用了一种基于可验证延迟函数的跨多个云的去中心化互审计架构,从本质上防止了预计算攻击,消除了云之间或云与审计师之间的潜在勾结。为了减轻区块链引起的存储开销,同时确保可控的可重写性,我们设计了一个具有双活板门密钥控制的块级可重写区块链。通过分离短期和长期的活板门密钥授权,PVICA减少了冗余的外包日志,并实现了高效的审计更新。此外,我们集成了RSA累加器以实现恒定时间的跨版本验证,从而协调了审计日志隐私和法规遵从性之间的冲突。正式的安全性分析表明,PVICA实现了存储正确性和篡改检测等关键保证。实验结果表明,与传统方法相比,其块级编校机制显著提高了审计吞吐量,突出了其在实际部署中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provable Versioned Inter-Cloud Auditing via Block-Level Redactable Blockchain
As a core infrastructure for data governance, trustworthy cloud storage demands secure and efficient auditing mechanisms, which are essential for unlocking data value.However, existing public auditing schemes suffer from critical limitations, including collusion risks introduced by third-party auditors, storage bloat due to the immutability of blockchain, and inefficiencies in version traceability. In this paper, we propose PVICA, a provable versioned inter-cloud auditing scheme to address these challenges. PVICA adopts a decentralized mutual auditing architecture across multiple clouds based on verifiable delay functions, which inherently prevent precomputation attacks and eliminate potential collusion between clouds or between a cloud and its auditor. To mitigate blockchain-induced storage overhead while ensuring controlled redactability, we design a block-level redactable blockchain with double-trapdoor keys control. By separating ephemeral and long-term trapdoor key authorities, PVICA reduces redundant outsourced logs and enables efficient audit updates. Moreover, we integrate RSA accumulators to achieve constant-time cross-version verification, thereby reconciling the conflict between audit log privacy and regulatory compliance. Formal security analysis demonstrates that PVICA achieves key guarantees such as storage correctness and tamper detection. Experimental results show that its block-level redacting mechanism significantly improves audit throughput over traditional approaches, highlighting its practicality for real-world deployment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing Computer Science-Software
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing (TCC) is dedicated to the multidisciplinary field of cloud computing. It is committed to the publication of articles that present innovative research ideas, application results, and case studies in cloud computing, focusing on key technical issues related to theory, algorithms, systems, applications, and performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书