艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的临床实践、有效性和安全性:一项法国前瞻性队列研究(ELLIPSE研究)。

IF 5 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-08-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253261463652
Pierre-Michel Llorca, Anne Sauvaget, Emilie Olié, Lila Mékaoui, Ludovic Samalin, Maud Rothärmel, Anne-Laure Boitez, Julien Dupin, Clotilde Wicart, Emeline Gaudre-Wattinne, Hugo Lacour, Benjamin Grenier, Bernard Astruc, Bruno Falissard, Pierre de Maricourt
{"title":"艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的临床实践、有效性和安全性:一项法国前瞻性队列研究(ELLIPSE研究)。","authors":"Pierre-Michel Llorca, Anne Sauvaget, Emilie Olié, Lila Mékaoui, Ludovic Samalin, Maud Rothärmel, Anne-Laure Boitez, Julien Dupin, Clotilde Wicart, Emeline Gaudre-Wattinne, Hugo Lacour, Benjamin Grenier, Bernard Astruc, Bruno Falissard, Pierre de Maricourt","doi":"10.1177/20451253261463652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and associated with significant disability and mortality. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined as inadequate response to ⩾2 antidepressant lines, remains a major therapeutic challenge. Esketamine nasal spray, approved in 2019 for TRD, demonstrated efficacy and safety in randomized trials, but real-world evidence remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ELLIPSE study aimed to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and 12-month outcomes of esketamine in routine clinical practice in France.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>ELLIPSE was a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study including adults with unipolar MDD initiating esketamine between Dec 2021 and Jul 2023, followed for 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via standardized clinical assessments. Effectiveness was evaluated using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Response was defined as ⩾50% MADRS reduction; remission as MADRS ⩽ 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 patients (mean age 46.6 years; 56.5% female) were enrolled; 97.5% met TRD criteria. Median esketamine exposure was 4.5 months. Mean MADRS decreased from 31.9 at baseline to 12.4 at month 12 (mean change -17.9; 95% CI: -21.6 to -14.2). Response and remission rates reached a plateau at month 2, where the response rate was 55.2% and the remission rate was 33.6%, maintained up to month 12. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 65.7% of patients, most commonly dissociative states (28.0%) and transient blood pressure increases (11.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world study in patients with treatment-resistant depression, including those with comorbidities/prior suicide attempts, showed clinically relevant improvement from month 2, sustained through 12 months. Dissociative symptoms were the most frequent treatment-related AE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"20451253261463652"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13530513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world clinical practice, effectiveness and safety of esketamine nasal spray in major depressive disorder patients: a French prospective cohort (ELLIPSE study).\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Michel Llorca, Anne Sauvaget, Emilie Olié, Lila Mékaoui, Ludovic Samalin, Maud Rothärmel, Anne-Laure Boitez, Julien Dupin, Clotilde Wicart, Emeline Gaudre-Wattinne, Hugo Lacour, Benjamin Grenier, Bernard Astruc, Bruno Falissard, Pierre de Maricourt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20451253261463652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and associated with significant disability and mortality. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined as inadequate response to ⩾2 antidepressant lines, remains a major therapeutic challenge. Esketamine nasal spray, approved in 2019 for TRD, demonstrated efficacy and safety in randomized trials, but real-world evidence remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ELLIPSE study aimed to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and 12-month outcomes of esketamine in routine clinical practice in France.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>ELLIPSE was a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study including adults with unipolar MDD initiating esketamine between Dec 2021 and Jul 2023, followed for 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via standardized clinical assessments. Effectiveness was evaluated using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Response was defined as ⩾50% MADRS reduction; remission as MADRS ⩽ 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 patients (mean age 46.6 years; 56.5% female) were enrolled; 97.5% met TRD criteria. Median esketamine exposure was 4.5 months. Mean MADRS decreased from 31.9 at baseline to 12.4 at month 12 (mean change -17.9; 95% CI: -21.6 to -14.2). Response and remission rates reached a plateau at month 2, where the response rate was 55.2% and the remission rate was 33.6%, maintained up to month 12. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 65.7% of patients, most commonly dissociative states (28.0%) and transient blood pressure increases (11.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world study in patients with treatment-resistant depression, including those with comorbidities/prior suicide attempts, showed clinically relevant improvement from month 2, sustained through 12 months. Dissociative symptoms were the most frequent treatment-related AE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20451253261463652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13530513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253261463652\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253261463652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)非常普遍,并与显著的残疾和死亡率相关。治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD),定义为对小于2条抗抑郁药线的反应不足,仍然是一个主要的治疗挑战。2019年批准用于TRD的艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂在随机试验中证明了有效性和安全性,但实际证据仍然有限。目的:ELLIPSE研究旨在描述法国常规临床实践中埃氯胺酮的患者特征、治疗模式和12个月的结果。设计:ELLIPSE是一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究,包括在2021年12月至2023年7月期间服用艾氯胺酮的单极MDD成人患者,随访12个月。方法:通过标准化临床评估收集资料。使用Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评估疗效。反应被定义为小于或等于MADRS减少50%;MADRS≥10时缓解。结果:共纳入200例患者,平均年龄46.6岁,女性56.5%;97.5%符合TRD标准。艾氯胺酮暴露的中位数为4.5个月。平均MADRS从基线时的31.9下降到12个月时的12.4(平均变化-17.9;95% CI: -21.6至-14.2)。缓解率和缓解率在第2个月达到平稳期,其中缓解率为55.2%,缓解率为33.6%,一直维持到第12个月。65.7%的患者发生不良事件(ae),最常见的是分离状态(28.0%)和短暂性血压升高(11.6%)。结论:这项现实世界的研究,在治疗难治性抑郁症患者中,包括那些有合并症/有自杀企图的患者,从第2个月开始显示出临床相关的改善,持续到12个月。解离性症状是最常见的治疗相关AE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world clinical practice, effectiveness and safety of esketamine nasal spray in major depressive disorder patients: a French prospective cohort (ELLIPSE study).

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and associated with significant disability and mortality. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined as inadequate response to ⩾2 antidepressant lines, remains a major therapeutic challenge. Esketamine nasal spray, approved in 2019 for TRD, demonstrated efficacy and safety in randomized trials, but real-world evidence remains limited.

Objectives: The ELLIPSE study aimed to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and 12-month outcomes of esketamine in routine clinical practice in France.

Design: ELLIPSE was a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study including adults with unipolar MDD initiating esketamine between Dec 2021 and Jul 2023, followed for 12 months.

Methods: Data were collected via standardized clinical assessments. Effectiveness was evaluated using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Response was defined as ⩾50% MADRS reduction; remission as MADRS ⩽ 10.

Results: A total of 200 patients (mean age 46.6 years; 56.5% female) were enrolled; 97.5% met TRD criteria. Median esketamine exposure was 4.5 months. Mean MADRS decreased from 31.9 at baseline to 12.4 at month 12 (mean change -17.9; 95% CI: -21.6 to -14.2). Response and remission rates reached a plateau at month 2, where the response rate was 55.2% and the remission rate was 33.6%, maintained up to month 12. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 65.7% of patients, most commonly dissociative states (28.0%) and transient blood pressure increases (11.6%).

Conclusion: This real-world study in patients with treatment-resistant depression, including those with comorbidities/prior suicide attempts, showed clinically relevant improvement from month 2, sustained through 12 months. Dissociative symptoms were the most frequent treatment-related AE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书