痛苦容忍和自我伤害的思想和行为:对方法论挑战的系统回顾和评论。

IF 7.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Erin A Kaufman, Brianna Meddaoui, Sarah E Victor, Vanit Shah, Jin H Prunuske
{"title":"痛苦容忍和自我伤害的思想和行为:对方法论挑战的系统回顾和评论。","authors":"Erin A Kaufman, Brianna Meddaoui, Sarah E Victor, Vanit Shah, Jin H Prunuske","doi":"10.1037/cps0000378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impaired distress tolerance (DT) is theorized to be an etiological and maintenance factor for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, the literature on DT and SITBs suffers from conflicting results and methodological challenges, and thus, is difficult to interpret.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a systematic review to synthesize available evidence on DT and the full range of SITBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included peer-reviewed, English-language manuscripts presenting empirical data on DT/intolerance in relation to SITB among humans. Studies were identified via a search covering results published through December 31, 2024 at Academic Search Premier, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PubMed (most recently executed June 20th, 2025). No formal risk of bias assessments were used. Results were synthesized by DT assessment type (self-report, behavioral, combined) and study approach (observational, longitudinal, intervention). Of the 1058 studies screened, 81 were eligible for inclusion with 30,052 participants. This review was neither funded nor preregistered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-report measures appear to assess distress intolerance rather than high tolerance/endurance abilities. Findings generally indicate lower scores reflecting greater intolerance are associated with SITB across both suicide-related and non-suicidal self-injury outcomes; however, there are notable exceptions, and significant limitations associated with sample selection and research design that makes interpretation challenging.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The vast majority of results were obtained with a single self-report measure at one point in time. Laboratory paradigms reviewed seem to have poor ecological validity with limited relevance to the contexts in which SITBs emerge, and produced mixed associations with SITB. Within-person variability in DT has largely gone unexamined, and important mediators and moderators are underexplored. We discuss several areas for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10434,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13489593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distress Tolerance and Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors: A systematic review and commentary on methodological challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Erin A Kaufman, Brianna Meddaoui, Sarah E Victor, Vanit Shah, Jin H Prunuske\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cps0000378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Impaired distress tolerance (DT) is theorized to be an etiological and maintenance factor for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, the literature on DT and SITBs suffers from conflicting results and methodological challenges, and thus, is difficult to interpret.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a systematic review to synthesize available evidence on DT and the full range of SITBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included peer-reviewed, English-language manuscripts presenting empirical data on DT/intolerance in relation to SITB among humans. Studies were identified via a search covering results published through December 31, 2024 at Academic Search Premier, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PubMed (most recently executed June 20th, 2025). No formal risk of bias assessments were used. Results were synthesized by DT assessment type (self-report, behavioral, combined) and study approach (observational, longitudinal, intervention). Of the 1058 studies screened, 81 were eligible for inclusion with 30,052 participants. This review was neither funded nor preregistered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-report measures appear to assess distress intolerance rather than high tolerance/endurance abilities. Findings generally indicate lower scores reflecting greater intolerance are associated with SITB across both suicide-related and non-suicidal self-injury outcomes; however, there are notable exceptions, and significant limitations associated with sample selection and research design that makes interpretation challenging.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The vast majority of results were obtained with a single self-report measure at one point in time. Laboratory paradigms reviewed seem to have poor ecological validity with limited relevance to the contexts in which SITBs emerge, and produced mixed associations with SITB. Within-person variability in DT has largely gone unexamined, and important mediators and moderators are underexplored. We discuss several areas for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13489593/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000378\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

痛苦耐受性受损(DT)被认为是自伤思想和行为(sitb)的病因和维持因素。然而,关于DT和sitb的文献受到相互矛盾的结果和方法挑战的影响,因此很难解释。目的:我们进行了一项系统综述,以综合有关DT和全范围sitb的现有证据。方法:我们纳入了同行评审的英文手稿,提供了与人类SITB相关的DT/不耐受的经验数据。通过对截止2024年12月31日在Academic search Premier、MEDLINE、PsychINFO和PubMed(最近一次执行于2025年6月20日)上发布的结果进行搜索,确定了研究。未使用正式的偏倚风险评估。采用DT评估类型(自我报告、行为、联合)和研究方法(观察、纵向、干预)对结果进行综合。在筛选的1058项研究中,有81项符合纳入条件,共有30,052名参与者。本综述既没有获得资助,也没有预先注册。结果:自我报告测量似乎评估痛苦不耐受而不是高耐受/耐力能力。研究结果普遍表明,在自杀相关和非自杀性自伤结果中,较低的分数反映出更大的不耐受与SITB相关;然而,也有明显的例外,以及与样本选择和研究设计相关的重大限制,这使得解释具有挑战性。讨论:绝大多数结果都是在一个时间点上通过单一的自我报告测量获得的。所回顾的实验室范式似乎具有较差的生态有效性,与SITB出现的背景相关性有限,并且与SITB产生了混合关联。DT的个人变异在很大程度上没有得到检验,重要的调节因子和调节因子也没有得到充分的探索。我们讨论了几个有待进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distress Tolerance and Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors: A systematic review and commentary on methodological challenges.

Impaired distress tolerance (DT) is theorized to be an etiological and maintenance factor for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, the literature on DT and SITBs suffers from conflicting results and methodological challenges, and thus, is difficult to interpret.

Objectives: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize available evidence on DT and the full range of SITBs.

Methods: We included peer-reviewed, English-language manuscripts presenting empirical data on DT/intolerance in relation to SITB among humans. Studies were identified via a search covering results published through December 31, 2024 at Academic Search Premier, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PubMed (most recently executed June 20th, 2025). No formal risk of bias assessments were used. Results were synthesized by DT assessment type (self-report, behavioral, combined) and study approach (observational, longitudinal, intervention). Of the 1058 studies screened, 81 were eligible for inclusion with 30,052 participants. This review was neither funded nor preregistered.

Results: Self-report measures appear to assess distress intolerance rather than high tolerance/endurance abilities. Findings generally indicate lower scores reflecting greater intolerance are associated with SITB across both suicide-related and non-suicidal self-injury outcomes; however, there are notable exceptions, and significant limitations associated with sample selection and research design that makes interpretation challenging.

Discussion: The vast majority of results were obtained with a single self-report measure at one point in time. Laboratory paradigms reviewed seem to have poor ecological validity with limited relevance to the contexts in which SITBs emerge, and produced mixed associations with SITB. Within-person variability in DT has largely gone unexamined, and important mediators and moderators are underexplored. We discuss several areas for further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice presents cutting-edge developments in the science and practice of clinical psychology and related mental health fields by publishing scholarly articles, primarily involving narrative and systematic reviews as well as meta-analyses related to assessment, intervention, and service delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书