非正式职业环境中工作特定铅暴露梯度和个人防护装备悖论:冈比亚病例对照研究。

IF 3.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Environmental Health Insights Pub Date : 2026-08-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786302261480468
Edrisa Sanyang, Amadou Barrow, Alhaji Jabbi, Musa Drammeh, Abdoulie M Sanyang, Abdoulie Nanko, William N Mkanta
{"title":"非正式职业环境中工作特定铅暴露梯度和个人防护装备悖论:冈比亚病例对照研究。","authors":"Edrisa Sanyang, Amadou Barrow, Alhaji Jabbi, Musa Drammeh, Abdoulie M Sanyang, Abdoulie Nanko, William N Mkanta","doi":"10.1177/11786302261480468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occupational lead exposure remains a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, yet within-industry exposure gradients are poorly characterized. This case-control study assessed job-specific blood lead level (BLL) gradients and personal protective equipment (PPE) use patterns among 145 auto repair workers and 68 healthcare controls in The Gambia. BLLs were measured using LeadCare II analyzers. Exposed workers had significantly higher BLLs than controls (median: 7.40 vs. 5.80 μg/dL; p < 0.001). A striking 5.3-fold gradient was observed across specialties: battery repairers (35.62 μg/dL), electricians (15.17 μg/dL), panel beaters/welders (11.45 μg/dL), mechanics (9.08 μg/dL), and spray painters (6.67 μg/dL). All battery repairers had BLL ≥10 μg/dL. Paradoxically, high-risk workers (battery repairers, electricians) had the lowest PPE use rates (14.3%) despite having the highest exposure levels. Adjusted regression confirmed battery repairers had BLLs 27.14 μg/dL higher than mechanics (95% CI 17.69 to 36.58; p < 0.001). These findings underscore the need for targeted, specialty-specific interventions prioritizing battery repair and electrical work in informal occupational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11827,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Insights","volume":"20 ","pages":"11786302261480468"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13477530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job-Specific Lead Exposure Gradients and Personal Protective Equipment Paradox in Informal Occupational Settings: A Case-Control Study from The Gambia.\",\"authors\":\"Edrisa Sanyang, Amadou Barrow, Alhaji Jabbi, Musa Drammeh, Abdoulie M Sanyang, Abdoulie Nanko, William N Mkanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786302261480468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Occupational lead exposure remains a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, yet within-industry exposure gradients are poorly characterized. This case-control study assessed job-specific blood lead level (BLL) gradients and personal protective equipment (PPE) use patterns among 145 auto repair workers and 68 healthcare controls in The Gambia. BLLs were measured using LeadCare II analyzers. Exposed workers had significantly higher BLLs than controls (median: 7.40 vs. 5.80 μg/dL; p < 0.001). A striking 5.3-fold gradient was observed across specialties: battery repairers (35.62 μg/dL), electricians (15.17 μg/dL), panel beaters/welders (11.45 μg/dL), mechanics (9.08 μg/dL), and spray painters (6.67 μg/dL). All battery repairers had BLL ≥10 μg/dL. Paradoxically, high-risk workers (battery repairers, electricians) had the lowest PPE use rates (14.3%) despite having the highest exposure levels. Adjusted regression confirmed battery repairers had BLLs 27.14 μg/dL higher than mechanics (95% CI 17.69 to 36.58; p < 0.001). These findings underscore the need for targeted, specialty-specific interventions prioritizing battery repair and electrical work in informal occupational settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Insights\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"11786302261480468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13477530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302261480468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302261480468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在低收入和中等收入国家,职业性铅接触仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题,但行业内的接触梯度特征不佳。本病例对照研究评估了冈比亚145名汽车修理工人和68名卫生保健对照者的职业特异性血铅水平(BLL)梯度和个人防护装备(PPE)使用模式。使用LeadCare II分析仪测量bll。暴露工人的bll显著高于对照组(中位数:7.40 vs 5.80 μg/dL; p < 0.001)。在不同的专业中观察到惊人的5.3倍的梯度:电池修理工(35.62 μg/dL)、电工(15.17 μg/dL)、面板打热工/焊工(11.45 μg/dL)、机械师(9.08 μg/dL)和喷漆工(6.67 μg/dL)。电池修理工BLL均≥10 μg/dL。矛盾的是,高风险工人(电池修理工、电工)的PPE使用率最低(14.3%),尽管他们的暴露水平最高。校正回归证实,电池修理工的BLLs比机械师高27.14 μg/dL (95% CI 17.69 ~ 36.58; p < 0.001)。这些发现强调了有针对性的、特殊的干预措施的必要性,优先考虑非正式职业环境中的电池维修和电气工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Job-Specific Lead Exposure Gradients and Personal Protective Equipment Paradox in Informal Occupational Settings: A Case-Control Study from The Gambia.

Occupational lead exposure remains a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, yet within-industry exposure gradients are poorly characterized. This case-control study assessed job-specific blood lead level (BLL) gradients and personal protective equipment (PPE) use patterns among 145 auto repair workers and 68 healthcare controls in The Gambia. BLLs were measured using LeadCare II analyzers. Exposed workers had significantly higher BLLs than controls (median: 7.40 vs. 5.80 μg/dL; p < 0.001). A striking 5.3-fold gradient was observed across specialties: battery repairers (35.62 μg/dL), electricians (15.17 μg/dL), panel beaters/welders (11.45 μg/dL), mechanics (9.08 μg/dL), and spray painters (6.67 μg/dL). All battery repairers had BLL ≥10 μg/dL. Paradoxically, high-risk workers (battery repairers, electricians) had the lowest PPE use rates (14.3%) despite having the highest exposure levels. Adjusted regression confirmed battery repairers had BLLs 27.14 μg/dL higher than mechanics (95% CI 17.69 to 36.58; p < 0.001). These findings underscore the need for targeted, specialty-specific interventions prioritizing battery repair and electrical work in informal occupational settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Insights
Environmental Health Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
22.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书