Alaa Baqer Alali, Fatimah Ahmed Alhammad, Jumanah Ameer Almohammed Saleh, Salwa Baqer Alshaikh, Zahraa Khaled Alshayeb, Anfal Jaber Al Nujaidi, Ahmed Abdulmohsen Albinsaleh, Mohammed Radhi Almutawah, Mostafa Habeeb Alhodibi, Muslem Adel Albesher
{"title":"局部类维生素a与重大先天性畸形和自然流产的风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alaa Baqer Alali, Fatimah Ahmed Alhammad, Jumanah Ameer Almohammed Saleh, Salwa Baqer Alshaikh, Zahraa Khaled Alshayeb, Anfal Jaber Al Nujaidi, Ahmed Abdulmohsen Albinsaleh, Mohammed Radhi Almutawah, Mostafa Habeeb Alhodibi, Muslem Adel Albesher","doi":"10.3389/fdsfr.2026.1864872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical retinoids are commonly prescribed for dermatological conditions during reproductive years; however, concerns regarding teratogenicity have persisted due to the established risks associated with oral retinoids. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between first-trimester topical retinoid exposure and risks of major congenital malformations (MCM) and spontaneous abortion (SAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 25, 2025. Studies comparing pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to topical retinoids versus unexposed controls were included. Random-effects meta-analysis, Bayesian hierarchical modeling with multiple prior specifications, and Robust Bayesian Model-Averaged (RoBMA) analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies with total of 3,632,118 pregnancies were included. Topical retinoid exposure was not significantly associated with MCM risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.07, P-value = 0.14, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) or SAB risk (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.43, P-value = 0.94, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Bayesian analysis with three prior specifications yielded posterior estimates ranging from RR 0.86 to 0.89, all with credible intervals crossing unity. RoBMA demonstrated 74.1% posterior probability favoring the null hypothesis (BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.35). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis identified Refsum et al., 2025 as influential for MCM (+29.6% change when omitted). E-value analysis indicated findings were not significant to unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical retinoid exposure during the first trimester was not associated with increased risks of MCM or SAB. These findings support the relative safety of topical retinoids in early pregnancy; however the results were driven mainly by a single large registry study.</p>","PeriodicalId":521057,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in drug safety and regulation","volume":"6 ","pages":"1864872"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical retinoids and risk of major congenital malformations and spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alaa Baqer Alali, Fatimah Ahmed Alhammad, Jumanah Ameer Almohammed Saleh, Salwa Baqer Alshaikh, Zahraa Khaled Alshayeb, Anfal Jaber Al Nujaidi, Ahmed Abdulmohsen Albinsaleh, Mohammed Radhi Almutawah, Mostafa Habeeb Alhodibi, Muslem Adel Albesher\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdsfr.2026.1864872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical retinoids are commonly prescribed for dermatological conditions during reproductive years; however, concerns regarding teratogenicity have persisted due to the established risks associated with oral retinoids. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between first-trimester topical retinoid exposure and risks of major congenital malformations (MCM) and spontaneous abortion (SAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 25, 2025. Studies comparing pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to topical retinoids versus unexposed controls were included. Random-effects meta-analysis, Bayesian hierarchical modeling with multiple prior specifications, and Robust Bayesian Model-Averaged (RoBMA) analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies with total of 3,632,118 pregnancies were included. Topical retinoid exposure was not significantly associated with MCM risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.07, P-value = 0.14, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) or SAB risk (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.43, P-value = 0.94, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Bayesian analysis with three prior specifications yielded posterior estimates ranging from RR 0.86 to 0.89, all with credible intervals crossing unity. RoBMA demonstrated 74.1% posterior probability favoring the null hypothesis (BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.35). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis identified Refsum et al., 2025 as influential for MCM (+29.6% change when omitted). E-value analysis indicated findings were not significant to unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical retinoid exposure during the first trimester was not associated with increased risks of MCM or SAB. These findings support the relative safety of topical retinoids in early pregnancy; however the results were driven mainly by a single large registry study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":521057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in drug safety and regulation\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1864872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in drug safety and regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2026.1864872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in drug safety and regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2026.1864872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:外用类维生素a通常用于育龄期的皮肤病;然而,由于口服类维生素a的既定风险,对致畸性的担忧一直存在。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估妊娠早期局部类维生素a暴露与重大先天性畸形(MCM)和自然流产(SAB)风险之间的关系。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南,我们检索了PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar,截止日期为2025年11月25日。比较暴露于局部类维生素a与未暴露对照组妇女妊娠结局的研究包括在内。随机效应荟萃分析、多先验规范贝叶斯分层建模和稳健贝叶斯平均模型(RoBMA)分析。结果:8项研究共纳入3,632,118例妊娠。局部类维甲酸暴露与MCM风险(风险比[RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.07, p值= 0.14,I2 = 0%)或SAB风险(RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.43, p值= 0.94,I2 = 0%)无显著相关性。具有三个先验规范的贝叶斯分析产生的后验估计的RR范围为0.86至0.89,所有可信区间都跨越统一。RoBMA显示74.1%的后验概率支持零假设(BF10 = 0.35)。留一敏感性分析确定Refsum等人,2025对MCM有影响(省略时变化+29.6%)。e值分析表明,研究结果与未测量的混杂因素无关。结论:孕早期局部类维生素a暴露与MCM或SAB风险增加无关。这些发现支持在妊娠早期局部使用类维生素a的相对安全性;然而,这些结果主要是由单一的大型注册研究驱动的。
Topical retinoids and risk of major congenital malformations and spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Topical retinoids are commonly prescribed for dermatological conditions during reproductive years; however, concerns regarding teratogenicity have persisted due to the established risks associated with oral retinoids. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between first-trimester topical retinoid exposure and risks of major congenital malformations (MCM) and spontaneous abortion (SAB).
Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 25, 2025. Studies comparing pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to topical retinoids versus unexposed controls were included. Random-effects meta-analysis, Bayesian hierarchical modeling with multiple prior specifications, and Robust Bayesian Model-Averaged (RoBMA) analysis were performed.
Results: Eight studies with total of 3,632,118 pregnancies were included. Topical retinoid exposure was not significantly associated with MCM risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.07, P-value = 0.14, I2 = 0%) or SAB risk (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.43, P-value = 0.94, I2 = 0%). Bayesian analysis with three prior specifications yielded posterior estimates ranging from RR 0.86 to 0.89, all with credible intervals crossing unity. RoBMA demonstrated 74.1% posterior probability favoring the null hypothesis (BF10 = 0.35). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis identified Refsum et al., 2025 as influential for MCM (+29.6% change when omitted). E-value analysis indicated findings were not significant to unmeasured confounding.
Conclusion: Topical retinoid exposure during the first trimester was not associated with increased risks of MCM or SAB. These findings support the relative safety of topical retinoids in early pregnancy; however the results were driven mainly by a single large registry study.