实践中的邪恶问题:应对荒野生态转型。

IF 5.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ambio Pub Date : 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s13280-026-02446-3
Jaclyn Fox Rushing, Kira Hefty, Teresa N Hollingsworth, Amanda E Cravens, Christopher A Armatas, Clare Boerigter, Kellie J Carim, Shelley D Crausbay, Olga Helmy, David J Lawrence, Lauren Redmore, Gregor W Schuurman, Eric J Taylor, Jennifer L Wilkening, Katherine A Zeller, Sean A Parks
{"title":"实践中的邪恶问题:应对荒野生态转型。","authors":"Jaclyn Fox Rushing, Kira Hefty, Teresa N Hollingsworth, Amanda E Cravens, Christopher A Armatas, Clare Boerigter, Kellie J Carim, Shelley D Crausbay, Olga Helmy, David J Lawrence, Lauren Redmore, Gregor W Schuurman, Eric J Taylor, Jennifer L Wilkening, Katherine A Zeller, Sean A Parks","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02446-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Congressionally designated wilderness offers the highest level of land protection in the USA, comparable to category 1b wilderness as defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, yet wilderness areas face impacts of climate change. Researchers and managers increasingly recognize the immense challenge of stewarding wilderness in a changing climate. Although responding to climate change is considered a wicked problem, this framing has not been applied to wilderness contexts. We move theory into practice by using wicked problem framing and four illustrative cases to explore how the resist-accept-direct (RAD) framework can help untangle the wicked problem of addressing unprecedented ecological transformation in wilderness. The RAD framework clarifies a range of response options including resisting transformation, accepting it, or directing it toward preferred new conditions. As climate change continues to challenge wilderness managers, the RAD framework can help assess trade-offs and preserve wilderness character into the twenty-first century.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wicked problems in practice: Responding to ecological transformation in wilderness.\",\"authors\":\"Jaclyn Fox Rushing, Kira Hefty, Teresa N Hollingsworth, Amanda E Cravens, Christopher A Armatas, Clare Boerigter, Kellie J Carim, Shelley D Crausbay, Olga Helmy, David J Lawrence, Lauren Redmore, Gregor W Schuurman, Eric J Taylor, Jennifer L Wilkening, Katherine A Zeller, Sean A Parks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13280-026-02446-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Congressionally designated wilderness offers the highest level of land protection in the USA, comparable to category 1b wilderness as defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, yet wilderness areas face impacts of climate change. Researchers and managers increasingly recognize the immense challenge of stewarding wilderness in a changing climate. Although responding to climate change is considered a wicked problem, this framing has not been applied to wilderness contexts. We move theory into practice by using wicked problem framing and four illustrative cases to explore how the resist-accept-direct (RAD) framework can help untangle the wicked problem of addressing unprecedented ecological transformation in wilderness. The RAD framework clarifies a range of response options including resisting transformation, accepting it, or directing it toward preferred new conditions. As climate change continues to challenge wilderness managers, the RAD framework can help assess trade-offs and preserve wilderness character into the twenty-first century.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambio\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02446-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02446-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国会指定的荒野提供了美国最高水平的土地保护,可与国际自然保护联盟定义的1b类荒野相媲美,但荒野地区面临气候变化的影响。研究人员和管理者越来越认识到,在不断变化的气候下管理荒野面临着巨大的挑战。虽然应对气候变化被认为是一个邪恶的问题,但这种框架并没有应用到荒野环境中。我们将理论转化为实践,通过使用邪恶问题框架和四个说明性案例来探索抵制-接受-直接(RAD)框架如何帮助解开解决荒野中前所未有的生态转型的邪恶问题。RAD框架阐明了一系列响应选项,包括抵制转换、接受转换或将其导向首选的新条件。随着气候变化继续挑战荒野管理者,RAD框架可以帮助评估权衡并将荒野特征保存到21世纪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wicked problems in practice: Responding to ecological transformation in wilderness.

Congressionally designated wilderness offers the highest level of land protection in the USA, comparable to category 1b wilderness as defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, yet wilderness areas face impacts of climate change. Researchers and managers increasingly recognize the immense challenge of stewarding wilderness in a changing climate. Although responding to climate change is considered a wicked problem, this framing has not been applied to wilderness contexts. We move theory into practice by using wicked problem framing and four illustrative cases to explore how the resist-accept-direct (RAD) framework can help untangle the wicked problem of addressing unprecedented ecological transformation in wilderness. The RAD framework clarifies a range of response options including resisting transformation, accepting it, or directing it toward preferred new conditions. As climate change continues to challenge wilderness managers, the RAD framework can help assess trade-offs and preserve wilderness character into the twenty-first century.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书