人为的临床风险:为什么更好的决策比更快的调查更重要。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel Stewart, Geoffrey Hardacre
{"title":"人为的临床风险:为什么更好的决策比更快的调查更重要。","authors":"Daniel Stewart,&nbsp;Geoffrey Hardacre","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Accurate emergency care depends not only on selecting appropriate investigations and treatments, but also on recognising when they are unnecessary. This article introduces Manufactured Clinical Risk (MCR), a cognitive phenomenon in which non-instrumental information generated by low-utility investigations is reinterpreted as genuine clinical risk and incorporated into subsequent decision making. MCR is proposed as the predictable consequence of relief-based decision making, whereby clinicians seek relief from uncertainty rather than rational assessment of clinical probability. Once established, MCR initiates ambiguity cascades that generate further investigations, referrals, admissions and treatments despite little meaningful change in the patient's underlying probability of disease. This framework provides a plausible explanation for why strategies that accelerate clinical activity do not always produce proportional improvements in emergency department performance. Improving threshold-based decision making may represent an alternative model of performance improvement by safely reducing unnecessary clinical activity before it occurs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manufactured Clinical Risk: Why Better Decisions Matter More Than Faster Investigations\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Stewart,&nbsp;Geoffrey Hardacre\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.70320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Accurate emergency care depends not only on selecting appropriate investigations and treatments, but also on recognising when they are unnecessary. This article introduces Manufactured Clinical Risk (MCR), a cognitive phenomenon in which non-instrumental information generated by low-utility investigations is reinterpreted as genuine clinical risk and incorporated into subsequent decision making. MCR is proposed as the predictable consequence of relief-based decision making, whereby clinicians seek relief from uncertainty rather than rational assessment of clinical probability. Once established, MCR initiates ambiguity cascades that generate further investigations, referrals, admissions and treatments despite little meaningful change in the patient's underlying probability of disease. This framework provides a plausible explanation for why strategies that accelerate clinical activity do not always produce proportional improvements in emergency department performance. Improving threshold-based decision making may represent an alternative model of performance improvement by safely reducing unnecessary clinical activity before it occurs.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70320\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的紧急护理不仅取决于选择适当的调查和治疗,而且还取决于认识到什么时候是不必要的。本文介绍了人造临床风险(MCR),这是一种认知现象,在这种现象中,低效用调查产生的非工具信息被重新解释为真正的临床风险,并纳入随后的决策。MCR被认为是基于救济的决策的可预测结果,即临床医生从不确定性中寻求救济,而不是对临床概率的理性评估。一旦确定,MCR启动模糊级联,产生进一步的调查,转诊,入院和治疗,尽管病人的潜在疾病概率没有什么有意义的变化。这个框架提供了一个合理的解释,为什么加速临床活动的策略并不总是在急诊科绩效中产生成比例的改善。通过在不必要的临床活动发生之前安全减少不必要的临床活动,改进基于阈值的决策可能代表了绩效改进的另一种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manufactured Clinical Risk: Why Better Decisions Matter More Than Faster Investigations

Accurate emergency care depends not only on selecting appropriate investigations and treatments, but also on recognising when they are unnecessary. This article introduces Manufactured Clinical Risk (MCR), a cognitive phenomenon in which non-instrumental information generated by low-utility investigations is reinterpreted as genuine clinical risk and incorporated into subsequent decision making. MCR is proposed as the predictable consequence of relief-based decision making, whereby clinicians seek relief from uncertainty rather than rational assessment of clinical probability. Once established, MCR initiates ambiguity cascades that generate further investigations, referrals, admissions and treatments despite little meaningful change in the patient's underlying probability of disease. This framework provides a plausible explanation for why strategies that accelerate clinical activity do not always produce proportional improvements in emergency department performance. Improving threshold-based decision making may represent an alternative model of performance improvement by safely reducing unnecessary clinical activity before it occurs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书