Amy Mathieson, Lisa Brunton, Stephanie Gillibrand, Ramona Moldovan, John H. McDermott
{"title":"了解公众对英国直接面向消费者的药物基因组学测试的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Amy Mathieson, Lisa Brunton, Stephanie Gillibrand, Ramona Moldovan, John H. McDermott","doi":"10.1038/s41397-026-00425-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.","PeriodicalId":54624,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","volume":"26 4","pages":"31-"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13401518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Amy Mathieson, Lisa Brunton, Stephanie Gillibrand, Ramona Moldovan, John H. McDermott\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41397-026-00425-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacogenomics Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"31-\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13401518/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacogenomics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41397-026-00425-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41397-026-00425-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.
期刊介绍:
The Pharmacogenomics Journal is a print and electronic journal, which is dedicated to the rapid publication of original research on pharmacogenomics and its clinical applications.
Key areas of coverage include:
Personalized medicine
Effects of genetic variability on drug toxicity and efficacy
Identification and functional characterization of polymorphisms relevant to drug action
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variations and drug efficacy
Integration of new developments in the genome project and proteomics into clinical medicine, pharmacology, and therapeutics
Clinical applications of genomic science
Identification of novel genomic targets for drug development
Potential benefits of pharmacogenomics.