社交媒体和人工智能对风湿性疾病患者疾病认知和治疗依从性的影响

IF 1.8
Egla Samantha Sanchez-Peralta, Sharon Hervert-Bulbarella, Margarita Isabel Alarcon-Jarquin, Ana Cecilia Bardan-Inchaustegui, Angel Kevin Garza-Elizondo, Pablo Gamez-Siller, Jesus Alberto Cardenas-de la Garza, Dionicio Angel Galarza-Delgado, Diana Elsa Flores-Alvarado
{"title":"社交媒体和人工智能对风湿性疾病患者疾病认知和治疗依从性的影响","authors":"Egla Samantha Sanchez-Peralta, Sharon Hervert-Bulbarella, Margarita Isabel Alarcon-Jarquin, Ana Cecilia Bardan-Inchaustegui, Angel Kevin Garza-Elizondo, Pablo Gamez-Siller, Jesus Alberto Cardenas-de la Garza, Dionicio Angel Galarza-Delgado, Diana Elsa Flores-Alvarado","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>In the wake of the COVID-19 \"infodemic,\" patients increasingly turn to social media (SM) and artificial intelligence (AI) for health information. In regions with unique sociocultural challenges and varying education levels, understanding electronic health literacy (HL) is vital. This study evaluated engagement with and attitudes toward SM/AI among patients with rheumatology conditions to inform patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, cross-sectional study at a tertiary outpatient clinic in Monterrey, Mexico, from August 2024 to November 2024. Ninety-five adult patients (median age: 50; 92.6% females) completed a structured questionnaire comprising the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), the SM Engagement Questionnaire (SMEQ), and the AI Attitude Scale (AIAS-4). Comparisons between age groups (≤45 vs. >45 y) were performed using the χ 2 test and the Mann-Whitney U test ( p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daily SM use was almost universal (94.7%), and 30.5% had used AI for disease-related questions. Patients aged 45 or younger showed significantly higher electronic HL ( p = 0.010) and engagement with SM ( p < 0.001). Importantly, younger patients were less likely to change their treatment based on SM content compared with older patients ( p = 0.043). Although attitudes toward AI did not vary by age, 84.2% of patients believed their doctors were open to discussing digital information, and 91.6% would use SM if recommended by their physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital health literacy significantly influences how patients process online information and manage treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":520664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","volume":" ","pages":"188-191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Social Media and Artificial Intelligence on Illness Perception and Treatment Adherence in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Egla Samantha Sanchez-Peralta, Sharon Hervert-Bulbarella, Margarita Isabel Alarcon-Jarquin, Ana Cecilia Bardan-Inchaustegui, Angel Kevin Garza-Elizondo, Pablo Gamez-Siller, Jesus Alberto Cardenas-de la Garza, Dionicio Angel Galarza-Delgado, Diana Elsa Flores-Alvarado\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>In the wake of the COVID-19 \\\"infodemic,\\\" patients increasingly turn to social media (SM) and artificial intelligence (AI) for health information. In regions with unique sociocultural challenges and varying education levels, understanding electronic health literacy (HL) is vital. This study evaluated engagement with and attitudes toward SM/AI among patients with rheumatology conditions to inform patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, cross-sectional study at a tertiary outpatient clinic in Monterrey, Mexico, from August 2024 to November 2024. Ninety-five adult patients (median age: 50; 92.6% females) completed a structured questionnaire comprising the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), the SM Engagement Questionnaire (SMEQ), and the AI Attitude Scale (AIAS-4). Comparisons between age groups (≤45 vs. >45 y) were performed using the χ 2 test and the Mann-Whitney U test ( p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daily SM use was almost universal (94.7%), and 30.5% had used AI for disease-related questions. Patients aged 45 or younger showed significantly higher electronic HL ( p = 0.010) and engagement with SM ( p < 0.001). Importantly, younger patients were less likely to change their treatment based on SM content compared with older patients ( p = 0.043). Although attitudes toward AI did not vary by age, 84.2% of patients believed their doctors were open to discussing digital information, and 91.6% would use SM if recommended by their physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital health literacy significantly influences how patients process online information and manage treatment adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"188-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:在COVID-19“信息大流行”之后,越来越多的患者转向社交媒体(SM)和人工智能(AI)获取健康信息。在具有独特社会文化挑战和不同教育水平的地区,了解电子卫生素养(HL)至关重要。本研究评估了风湿病患者对SM/AI的参与和态度,以告知以患者为中心的护理。方法:我们于2024年8月至2024年11月在墨西哥蒙特雷的一家三级门诊进行了一项观察性横断面研究。95名成年患者(中位年龄:50岁;92.6%为女性)完成了一份结构化问卷,包括电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)、SM参与问卷(SMEQ)和人工智能态度量表(AIAS-4)。采用χ2检验和Mann-Whitney U检验(p < 0.05)比较各组间(≤45岁vs.≥45岁)的差异。结果:每天使用SM几乎是普遍的(94.7%),30.5%的人使用AI解决与疾病相关的问题。45岁及以下患者的电子HL (p = 0.010)和SM配合度(p < 0.001)均显著升高。重要的是,与老年患者相比,年轻患者不太可能根据SM含量改变治疗方法(p = 0.043)。尽管对人工智能的态度并不因年龄而异,但84.2%的患者认为他们的医生对讨论数字信息持开放态度,91.6%的患者认为如果医生建议他们使用SM。结论:数字健康素养显著影响患者处理在线信息和管理治疗依从性的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Social Media and Artificial Intelligence on Illness Perception and Treatment Adherence in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases.

Background/objective: In the wake of the COVID-19 "infodemic," patients increasingly turn to social media (SM) and artificial intelligence (AI) for health information. In regions with unique sociocultural challenges and varying education levels, understanding electronic health literacy (HL) is vital. This study evaluated engagement with and attitudes toward SM/AI among patients with rheumatology conditions to inform patient-centered care.

Methods: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional study at a tertiary outpatient clinic in Monterrey, Mexico, from August 2024 to November 2024. Ninety-five adult patients (median age: 50; 92.6% females) completed a structured questionnaire comprising the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), the SM Engagement Questionnaire (SMEQ), and the AI Attitude Scale (AIAS-4). Comparisons between age groups (≤45 vs. >45 y) were performed using the χ 2 test and the Mann-Whitney U test ( p < 0.05).

Results: Daily SM use was almost universal (94.7%), and 30.5% had used AI for disease-related questions. Patients aged 45 or younger showed significantly higher electronic HL ( p = 0.010) and engagement with SM ( p < 0.001). Importantly, younger patients were less likely to change their treatment based on SM content compared with older patients ( p = 0.043). Although attitudes toward AI did not vary by age, 84.2% of patients believed their doctors were open to discussing digital information, and 91.6% would use SM if recommended by their physicians.

Conclusions: Digital health literacy significantly influences how patients process online information and manage treatment adherence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书