臀大肌转移的结果和高发病率的腰椎病理:外展肌衰竭的潜在病因。

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2026-01-01
Bryan M Song, Cameron Foreman, Sarah Namrow, Michael D Harris, Cecilia Pascual-Garrido
{"title":"臀大肌转移的结果和高发病率的腰椎病理:外展肌衰竭的潜在病因。","authors":"Bryan M Song, Cameron Foreman, Sarah Namrow, Michael D Harris, Cecilia Pascual-Garrido","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gluteus maximus tendon transfer has been described as a salvage treatment option for irreparable abductor tendon tears. Current literature has demonstrated favorable short term outcomes, yet strength and gait abnormalities persist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gluteus maximus tendon transfer on patient reported outcomes (PROs) over two consecutive time points and determine the prevalence of concomitant lumbosacral pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable abductor insufficiency was performed. The mean age was 71 years (range, 61 to 83), and 88% (15/17) were women. Clinical outcomes were obtained from follow-up visits, and modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained at 24.9 ± 8.4 months (range, 13 to 42) and 47.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 31 to 65) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean mHHS (46.3 vs. 66.1, P<0.01), VAS at rest (3.1 vs. 0.9, P<0.01), and VAS with activity (5.9 vs. 1.9, P<0.01) improved between preoperative and 24.9 months postoperatively. Between 24.9 months and 47.1 months, mean mHHS (66.1 vs. 53.7, P<0.01) and VAS with activity (1.9 vs. 4.4, P<0.01) declined, and there was no difference in VAS at rest (0.9 vs. 2.1, P=0.09). Compared to the preoperative state, there was maintained improvement in mHHS (46.3 vs. 53.7, P=0.03) but no difference in VAS scores. Lumbar spine pathology or lumbar spine instrumentation was present in 76% (13/17) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable abductor deficiency demonstrate improved PROs at 2 years postop-eratively. These improvements persist to a variable degree at 4 years. There was a high prevalence of associated lumbar spine pathology suggesting a key etiologic factor explaining why these patients exhibit severe fatty degeneration of the abductor musculature while preserving gluteus maximus function.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"171-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Gluteus Maximus Transfer and the High Prevalence of Lumbar Spine Pathology: A Potential Etiology of Abductor Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan M Song, Cameron Foreman, Sarah Namrow, Michael D Harris, Cecilia Pascual-Garrido\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gluteus maximus tendon transfer has been described as a salvage treatment option for irreparable abductor tendon tears. Current literature has demonstrated favorable short term outcomes, yet strength and gait abnormalities persist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gluteus maximus tendon transfer on patient reported outcomes (PROs) over two consecutive time points and determine the prevalence of concomitant lumbosacral pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable abductor insufficiency was performed. The mean age was 71 years (range, 61 to 83), and 88% (15/17) were women. Clinical outcomes were obtained from follow-up visits, and modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained at 24.9 ± 8.4 months (range, 13 to 42) and 47.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 31 to 65) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean mHHS (46.3 vs. 66.1, P<0.01), VAS at rest (3.1 vs. 0.9, P<0.01), and VAS with activity (5.9 vs. 1.9, P<0.01) improved between preoperative and 24.9 months postoperatively. Between 24.9 months and 47.1 months, mean mHHS (66.1 vs. 53.7, P<0.01) and VAS with activity (1.9 vs. 4.4, P<0.01) declined, and there was no difference in VAS at rest (0.9 vs. 2.1, P=0.09). Compared to the preoperative state, there was maintained improvement in mHHS (46.3 vs. 53.7, P=0.03) but no difference in VAS scores. Lumbar spine pathology or lumbar spine instrumentation was present in 76% (13/17) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable abductor deficiency demonstrate improved PROs at 2 years postop-eratively. These improvements persist to a variable degree at 4 years. There was a high prevalence of associated lumbar spine pathology suggesting a key etiologic factor explaining why these patients exhibit severe fatty degeneration of the abductor musculature while preserving gluteus maximus function.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"171-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389656/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:臀大肌腱转移被认为是不可修复的外展肌腱撕裂的救助性治疗选择。目前的文献显示了良好的短期结果,但力量和步态异常持续存在。本研究的目的是评估臀大肌腱转移对连续两个时间点患者报告的预后(PROs)的影响,并确定伴随腰骶部病变的患病率。方法:对17例因不可修复外展肌功能不全而行臀大肌转移的患者进行回顾性分析。平均年龄为71岁(61 ~ 83岁),88%(15/17)为女性。通过随访获得临床结果,并在术后24.9±8.4个月(范围,13 ~ 42)和47.1±9.4个月(范围,31 ~ 65)分别获得改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。结果:平均mHHS (46.3 vs 66.1, p)结论:接受臀大肌转移治疗不可修复外展肌缺陷的患者在术后2年的PROs得到改善。这些改善在4年后仍有不同程度的持续。相关腰椎病理的高流行率提示了一个关键的病因,解释了为什么这些患者在保持臀大肌功能的同时表现出严重的外展肌脂肪变性。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Gluteus Maximus Transfer and the High Prevalence of Lumbar Spine Pathology: A Potential Etiology of Abductor Failure.

Background: Gluteus maximus tendon transfer has been described as a salvage treatment option for irreparable abductor tendon tears. Current literature has demonstrated favorable short term outcomes, yet strength and gait abnormalities persist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gluteus maximus tendon transfer on patient reported outcomes (PROs) over two consecutive time points and determine the prevalence of concomitant lumbosacral pathology.

Methods: A retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable abductor insufficiency was performed. The mean age was 71 years (range, 61 to 83), and 88% (15/17) were women. Clinical outcomes were obtained from follow-up visits, and modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained at 24.9 ± 8.4 months (range, 13 to 42) and 47.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 31 to 65) postoperatively.

Results: Mean mHHS (46.3 vs. 66.1, P<0.01), VAS at rest (3.1 vs. 0.9, P<0.01), and VAS with activity (5.9 vs. 1.9, P<0.01) improved between preoperative and 24.9 months postoperatively. Between 24.9 months and 47.1 months, mean mHHS (66.1 vs. 53.7, P<0.01) and VAS with activity (1.9 vs. 4.4, P<0.01) declined, and there was no difference in VAS at rest (0.9 vs. 2.1, P=0.09). Compared to the preoperative state, there was maintained improvement in mHHS (46.3 vs. 53.7, P=0.03) but no difference in VAS scores. Lumbar spine pathology or lumbar spine instrumentation was present in 76% (13/17) of patients.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable abductor deficiency demonstrate improved PROs at 2 years postop-eratively. These improvements persist to a variable degree at 4 years. There was a high prevalence of associated lumbar spine pathology suggesting a key etiologic factor explaining why these patients exhibit severe fatty degeneration of the abductor musculature while preserving gluteus maximus function.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书