Reginald O Chinweze, Neal C Weldon, Matthew A Tao, Melissa N Manzer, Elizabeth A Wellsandt
{"title":"前交叉韧带损伤后MRI半自动定量定量膝关节积液的可靠性。","authors":"Reginald O Chinweze, Neal C Weldon, Matthew A Tao, Melissa N Manzer, Elizabeth A Wellsandt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effusion is a frequent finding after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction, but the reliability of its quantification on routine [non-contrast] magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not established. This study sought to evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of volumetric quantitative measurements (VQM) of knee effusion volumes (EV) using axial proton density-weighted, fat-suppressed (PD-FS) sequences after ACL injury and reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty deidentified MRIs (10 ACL-injured knees and 10 uninjured knees) were randomly selected from a prospective observational cohort of participants aged 15-35 years. Two independent raters analyzed EV using a custom MATLAB protocol. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>) with minimal detectable changes calculated. Measurement agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean EV were higher in the injured compared to uninjured knees (11.88±8.14 mL vs 2.03±0.76 mL). Volumetric effusion measurements demonstrated excellent intra-rater (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.993, 95% CI: 0.981-0.997, p<0.001) and inter-rater reliability (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.974, 95% CI: 0.907-0.991, p<0.001). The minimal detectable change was 0.145 mL for intra-rater measurements and 0.504 mL for inter-rater measurements. Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic bias between raters, although variability increased with larger volumes (>8 mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VQM using standard axial PD-FS MRI sequences demonstrate excellent reliability across raters. Restricting segmentation to the anterior compartment aligns with clinical assessment (e.g., sweep tests), though it does not capture whole-joint eflusion. This semi-automated approach may provide a relevant biomarker for monitoring EV in ACL research and rehabilitation trials.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"213-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Semi-Automated Volumetric Quantification of Knee Effusion Using MRI After Acl Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Reginald O Chinweze, Neal C Weldon, Matthew A Tao, Melissa N Manzer, Elizabeth A Wellsandt\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effusion is a frequent finding after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction, but the reliability of its quantification on routine [non-contrast] magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not established. This study sought to evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of volumetric quantitative measurements (VQM) of knee effusion volumes (EV) using axial proton density-weighted, fat-suppressed (PD-FS) sequences after ACL injury and reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty deidentified MRIs (10 ACL-injured knees and 10 uninjured knees) were randomly selected from a prospective observational cohort of participants aged 15-35 years. Two independent raters analyzed EV using a custom MATLAB protocol. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>) with minimal detectable changes calculated. Measurement agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean EV were higher in the injured compared to uninjured knees (11.88±8.14 mL vs 2.03±0.76 mL). Volumetric effusion measurements demonstrated excellent intra-rater (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.993, 95% CI: 0.981-0.997, p<0.001) and inter-rater reliability (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.974, 95% CI: 0.907-0.991, p<0.001). The minimal detectable change was 0.145 mL for intra-rater measurements and 0.504 mL for inter-rater measurements. Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic bias between raters, although variability increased with larger volumes (>8 mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VQM using standard axial PD-FS MRI sequences demonstrate excellent reliability across raters. Restricting segmentation to the anterior compartment aligns with clinical assessment (e.g., sweep tests), though it does not capture whole-joint eflusion. This semi-automated approach may provide a relevant biomarker for monitoring EV in ACL research and rehabilitation trials.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"213-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:积液是前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和重建后的常见发现,但常规[非对比]磁共振成像(MRI)量化其可靠性尚不确定。本研究旨在评估使用轴向质子密度加权、脂肪抑制(PD-FS)序列对ACL损伤和重建后膝关节积液体积(EV)进行体积定量测量(VQM)的评分内和评分间可靠性。方法:从15-35岁的前瞻性观察队列中随机选择20个未识别的mri(10个acl损伤的膝盖和10个未损伤的膝盖)。两个独立的评估师使用自定义的MATLAB协议分析EV。使用类内相关系数(ICC3,1)评估组内和组间可靠性,计算最小可检测变化。采用Bland-Altman图评估测量一致性。结果:损伤膝关节平均EV高于未损伤膝关节(11.88±8.14 mL vs 2.03±0.76 mL)。体积积液测量显示了良好的内流率(ICC3,1=0.993, 95% CI: 0.981-0.997, p3,1=0.974, 95% CI: 0.907-0.991, p8 mL)。结论:采用标准轴向PD-FS MRI序列的VQM在评分者中表现出极好的可靠性。限制前腔室的分割符合临床评估(例如,扫描试验),尽管它不能捕获整个关节的渗出。这种半自动化的方法可能为ACL研究和康复试验中监测EV提供相关的生物标志物。证据水平:III。
Reliability of Semi-Automated Volumetric Quantification of Knee Effusion Using MRI After Acl Injury.
Background: Effusion is a frequent finding after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction, but the reliability of its quantification on routine [non-contrast] magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not established. This study sought to evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of volumetric quantitative measurements (VQM) of knee effusion volumes (EV) using axial proton density-weighted, fat-suppressed (PD-FS) sequences after ACL injury and reconstruction.
Methods: Twenty deidentified MRIs (10 ACL-injured knees and 10 uninjured knees) were randomly selected from a prospective observational cohort of participants aged 15-35 years. Two independent raters analyzed EV using a custom MATLAB protocol. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1) with minimal detectable changes calculated. Measurement agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.
Results: Mean EV were higher in the injured compared to uninjured knees (11.88±8.14 mL vs 2.03±0.76 mL). Volumetric effusion measurements demonstrated excellent intra-rater (ICC3,1=0.993, 95% CI: 0.981-0.997, p<0.001) and inter-rater reliability (ICC3,1=0.974, 95% CI: 0.907-0.991, p<0.001). The minimal detectable change was 0.145 mL for intra-rater measurements and 0.504 mL for inter-rater measurements. Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic bias between raters, although variability increased with larger volumes (>8 mL).
Conclusion: VQM using standard axial PD-FS MRI sequences demonstrate excellent reliability across raters. Restricting segmentation to the anterior compartment aligns with clinical assessment (e.g., sweep tests), though it does not capture whole-joint eflusion. This semi-automated approach may provide a relevant biomarker for monitoring EV in ACL research and rehabilitation trials.