Christophe de Terwangne, Séverine Henrard, Sophie Marien, Michael A Steinman, Benoit B Boland, Antoine Christiaens
{"title":"老年住院2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病过度治疗和降糖治疗的标志:来自纵向队列的预后见解","authors":"Christophe de Terwangne, Séverine Henrard, Sophie Marien, Michael A Steinman, Benoit B Boland, Antoine Christiaens","doi":"10.1111/dme.70435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study investigated diabetes overtreatment (excessively intensive therapy) and flags for considering deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment (GLT) (clinical features identifying patients most likely to benefit from reducing treatment) in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their association with five-year survival in geriatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre retrospective cohort study including geriatric inpatients hospitalised between 2008 and 2015, aged ≥75 years with T2D on GLT. Diabetes overtreatment, according to the 2019-Endocrine Society guidelines, was retrospectively defined based on the patient's health status, level of HbA1c and presence of inducing hypoglycaemia GLT. Flags for deprescribing were selected from a systematic review of recommendations for GLT deprescribing in older diabetic adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 447 inpatients (women: 52.8%; median age: 83 years), 89% had a poor health status, 55.2% were overtreated, and 99.5% had at least one deprescribing flag, and 44% of patients with ≥1 deprescribing flag were not overtreated. Over the five-year follow-up, median survival time after hospitalisation was 1.83 years [IQR, 1.56-2.09], with an 18% five-year survival [95%CI, 15%-22%]. Both overtreatment (HR [95%CI] 1.29 [1.04;1.58]) and accumulation of flags for deprescribing (HR [95%CI] 1.20 [1.11;1.29] per additional flag) were associated with increased mortality. Patients meeting both ≥4 flags for deprescribing and overtreated had the worst survival outcomes (10% five-year survival rate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative burden of deprescribing flags provided complementary information beyond the current overtreatment definition. Patients classified as overtreated and combining several deprescribing criteria highlight a particularly vulnerable subgroup of patients with poor survival in which GLT use should be systematically reassessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520603,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","volume":" ","pages":"e70435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes overtreatment and flags for deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment in geriatric inpatients with type 2 diabetes: Prognostic insights from a longitudinal cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Christophe de Terwangne, Séverine Henrard, Sophie Marien, Michael A Steinman, Benoit B Boland, Antoine Christiaens\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study investigated diabetes overtreatment (excessively intensive therapy) and flags for considering deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment (GLT) (clinical features identifying patients most likely to benefit from reducing treatment) in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their association with five-year survival in geriatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre retrospective cohort study including geriatric inpatients hospitalised between 2008 and 2015, aged ≥75 years with T2D on GLT. Diabetes overtreatment, according to the 2019-Endocrine Society guidelines, was retrospectively defined based on the patient's health status, level of HbA1c and presence of inducing hypoglycaemia GLT. Flags for deprescribing were selected from a systematic review of recommendations for GLT deprescribing in older diabetic adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 447 inpatients (women: 52.8%; median age: 83 years), 89% had a poor health status, 55.2% were overtreated, and 99.5% had at least one deprescribing flag, and 44% of patients with ≥1 deprescribing flag were not overtreated. Over the five-year follow-up, median survival time after hospitalisation was 1.83 years [IQR, 1.56-2.09], with an 18% five-year survival [95%CI, 15%-22%]. Both overtreatment (HR [95%CI] 1.29 [1.04;1.58]) and accumulation of flags for deprescribing (HR [95%CI] 1.20 [1.11;1.29] per additional flag) were associated with increased mortality. Patients meeting both ≥4 flags for deprescribing and overtreated had the worst survival outcomes (10% five-year survival rate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative burden of deprescribing flags provided complementary information beyond the current overtreatment definition. Patients classified as overtreated and combining several deprescribing criteria highlight a particularly vulnerable subgroup of patients with poor survival in which GLT use should be systematically reassessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diabetes overtreatment and flags for deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment in geriatric inpatients with type 2 diabetes: Prognostic insights from a longitudinal cohort.
Aims: The study investigated diabetes overtreatment (excessively intensive therapy) and flags for considering deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment (GLT) (clinical features identifying patients most likely to benefit from reducing treatment) in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their association with five-year survival in geriatric inpatients.
Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort study including geriatric inpatients hospitalised between 2008 and 2015, aged ≥75 years with T2D on GLT. Diabetes overtreatment, according to the 2019-Endocrine Society guidelines, was retrospectively defined based on the patient's health status, level of HbA1c and presence of inducing hypoglycaemia GLT. Flags for deprescribing were selected from a systematic review of recommendations for GLT deprescribing in older diabetic adults.
Results: Of the 447 inpatients (women: 52.8%; median age: 83 years), 89% had a poor health status, 55.2% were overtreated, and 99.5% had at least one deprescribing flag, and 44% of patients with ≥1 deprescribing flag were not overtreated. Over the five-year follow-up, median survival time after hospitalisation was 1.83 years [IQR, 1.56-2.09], with an 18% five-year survival [95%CI, 15%-22%]. Both overtreatment (HR [95%CI] 1.29 [1.04;1.58]) and accumulation of flags for deprescribing (HR [95%CI] 1.20 [1.11;1.29] per additional flag) were associated with increased mortality. Patients meeting both ≥4 flags for deprescribing and overtreated had the worst survival outcomes (10% five-year survival rate).
Conclusion: The cumulative burden of deprescribing flags provided complementary information beyond the current overtreatment definition. Patients classified as overtreated and combining several deprescribing criteria highlight a particularly vulnerable subgroup of patients with poor survival in which GLT use should be systematically reassessed.