老年住院2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病过度治疗和降糖治疗的标志:来自纵向队列的预后见解

IF 3.4
Christophe de Terwangne, Séverine Henrard, Sophie Marien, Michael A Steinman, Benoit B Boland, Antoine Christiaens
{"title":"老年住院2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病过度治疗和降糖治疗的标志:来自纵向队列的预后见解","authors":"Christophe de Terwangne, Séverine Henrard, Sophie Marien, Michael A Steinman, Benoit B Boland, Antoine Christiaens","doi":"10.1111/dme.70435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study investigated diabetes overtreatment (excessively intensive therapy) and flags for considering deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment (GLT) (clinical features identifying patients most likely to benefit from reducing treatment) in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their association with five-year survival in geriatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre retrospective cohort study including geriatric inpatients hospitalised between 2008 and 2015, aged ≥75 years with T2D on GLT. Diabetes overtreatment, according to the 2019-Endocrine Society guidelines, was retrospectively defined based on the patient's health status, level of HbA1c and presence of inducing hypoglycaemia GLT. Flags for deprescribing were selected from a systematic review of recommendations for GLT deprescribing in older diabetic adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 447 inpatients (women: 52.8%; median age: 83 years), 89% had a poor health status, 55.2% were overtreated, and 99.5% had at least one deprescribing flag, and 44% of patients with ≥1 deprescribing flag were not overtreated. Over the five-year follow-up, median survival time after hospitalisation was 1.83 years [IQR, 1.56-2.09], with an 18% five-year survival [95%CI, 15%-22%]. Both overtreatment (HR [95%CI] 1.29 [1.04;1.58]) and accumulation of flags for deprescribing (HR [95%CI] 1.20 [1.11;1.29] per additional flag) were associated with increased mortality. Patients meeting both ≥4 flags for deprescribing and overtreated had the worst survival outcomes (10% five-year survival rate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative burden of deprescribing flags provided complementary information beyond the current overtreatment definition. Patients classified as overtreated and combining several deprescribing criteria highlight a particularly vulnerable subgroup of patients with poor survival in which GLT use should be systematically reassessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520603,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","volume":" ","pages":"e70435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes overtreatment and flags for deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment in geriatric inpatients with type 2 diabetes: Prognostic insights from a longitudinal cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Christophe de Terwangne, Séverine Henrard, Sophie Marien, Michael A Steinman, Benoit B Boland, Antoine Christiaens\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study investigated diabetes overtreatment (excessively intensive therapy) and flags for considering deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment (GLT) (clinical features identifying patients most likely to benefit from reducing treatment) in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their association with five-year survival in geriatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre retrospective cohort study including geriatric inpatients hospitalised between 2008 and 2015, aged ≥75 years with T2D on GLT. Diabetes overtreatment, according to the 2019-Endocrine Society guidelines, was retrospectively defined based on the patient's health status, level of HbA1c and presence of inducing hypoglycaemia GLT. Flags for deprescribing were selected from a systematic review of recommendations for GLT deprescribing in older diabetic adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 447 inpatients (women: 52.8%; median age: 83 years), 89% had a poor health status, 55.2% were overtreated, and 99.5% had at least one deprescribing flag, and 44% of patients with ≥1 deprescribing flag were not overtreated. Over the five-year follow-up, median survival time after hospitalisation was 1.83 years [IQR, 1.56-2.09], with an 18% five-year survival [95%CI, 15%-22%]. Both overtreatment (HR [95%CI] 1.29 [1.04;1.58]) and accumulation of flags for deprescribing (HR [95%CI] 1.20 [1.11;1.29] per additional flag) were associated with increased mortality. Patients meeting both ≥4 flags for deprescribing and overtreated had the worst survival outcomes (10% five-year survival rate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative burden of deprescribing flags provided complementary information beyond the current overtreatment definition. Patients classified as overtreated and combining several deprescribing criteria highlight a particularly vulnerable subgroup of patients with poor survival in which GLT use should be systematically reassessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究调查了老年2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的糖尿病过度治疗(过度强化治疗)和考虑降糖治疗(GLT)的标志(确定最有可能从减少治疗中获益的患者的临床特征)及其与老年住院患者5年生存率的关系。方法:单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2008年至2015年住院的老年住院患者,年龄≥75岁,伴有t2dm的GLT。根据2019年内分泌学会指南,糖尿病过度治疗是根据患者的健康状况、HbA1c水平和诱导低血糖GLT的存在来回顾性定义的。从对老年糖尿病患者GLT处方推荐的系统综述中选择处方标志。结果:447例住院患者(女性:52.8%,中位年龄:83岁)中,89%的患者健康状况不佳,55.2%的患者存在过度治疗,99.5%的患者至少有一个处方解除标志,44%的患者≥1个处方解除标志未出现过度治疗。在5年随访中,住院后的中位生存时间为1.83年[IQR, 1.56-2.09], 5年生存率为18% [95%CI, 15%-22%]。过度治疗(HR [95%CI] 1.29[1.04;1.58])和处方标志的积累(HR [95%CI] 1.20[1.11;1.29]每增加一个标志)都与死亡率增加有关。同时满足处方减量和过度治疗≥4个标志的患者生存结果最差(5年生存率为10%)。结论:描述标志的累积负担提供了目前过度治疗定义之外的补充信息。被归类为过度治疗的患者,结合几个处方标准,突出了一个特别脆弱的亚组患者,他们的生存差,应该系统地重新评估GLT的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diabetes overtreatment and flags for deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment in geriatric inpatients with type 2 diabetes: Prognostic insights from a longitudinal cohort.

Aims: The study investigated diabetes overtreatment (excessively intensive therapy) and flags for considering deprescribing glucose-lowering treatment (GLT) (clinical features identifying patients most likely to benefit from reducing treatment) in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their association with five-year survival in geriatric inpatients.

Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort study including geriatric inpatients hospitalised between 2008 and 2015, aged ≥75 years with T2D on GLT. Diabetes overtreatment, according to the 2019-Endocrine Society guidelines, was retrospectively defined based on the patient's health status, level of HbA1c and presence of inducing hypoglycaemia GLT. Flags for deprescribing were selected from a systematic review of recommendations for GLT deprescribing in older diabetic adults.

Results: Of the 447 inpatients (women: 52.8%; median age: 83 years), 89% had a poor health status, 55.2% were overtreated, and 99.5% had at least one deprescribing flag, and 44% of patients with ≥1 deprescribing flag were not overtreated. Over the five-year follow-up, median survival time after hospitalisation was 1.83 years [IQR, 1.56-2.09], with an 18% five-year survival [95%CI, 15%-22%]. Both overtreatment (HR [95%CI] 1.29 [1.04;1.58]) and accumulation of flags for deprescribing (HR [95%CI] 1.20 [1.11;1.29] per additional flag) were associated with increased mortality. Patients meeting both ≥4 flags for deprescribing and overtreated had the worst survival outcomes (10% five-year survival rate).

Conclusion: The cumulative burden of deprescribing flags provided complementary information beyond the current overtreatment definition. Patients classified as overtreated and combining several deprescribing criteria highlight a particularly vulnerable subgroup of patients with poor survival in which GLT use should be systematically reassessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书