术后负重对股骨颈系统治疗股骨颈囊内骨折的影响:一项比较队列研究。

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2026-01-01
Brendan P Mitchell, Seth A Tarrant, Zane D Littell, Nada L Jibbe, Rosalee E Zackula, Randall L Lais, Bradley R Dart
{"title":"术后负重对股骨颈系统治疗股骨颈囊内骨折的影响:一项比较队列研究。","authors":"Brendan P Mitchell, Seth A Tarrant, Zane D Littell, Nada L Jibbe, Rosalee E Zackula, Randall L Lais, Bradley R Dart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative weightbearing management of patients surgically treated for femoral neck fractures is controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients treated with a fixed-angle implant, the Femoral Neck System (FNS), as a function of their postoperative weightbearing protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative cohort study of patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures who underwent fixation with the FNS at a Level I trauma center from 2019 to 2023 was conducted. Patients were assigned to either the weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) group or the toe-touch weightbearing (TTWB) group based on surgeon preference after each procedure. Primary outcome measures were postoperative complications and the need for revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, SF-12 score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 25 patients in the WBAT group and 19 in the TTWB group. Ten of 25 (40%) fracture union complications occurred in the WBAT cohort compared with 6 of 19 (32%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.565). Revision surgeries were required in 7 of 25 cases (28%) in the WBAT cohort compared with 3 of 19 (16%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.339). No statistically significant differences in VAS pain scores, SF-12 scores, or WOMAC scores between the groups were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in radiographic complications, reoperations, or functional outcome scores between the two postoperative weightbearing protocols. Our findings suggest that WBAT may be permitted in this patient cohort, thereby simplifying postoperative care for patients and surgeons.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"255-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Postoperative Weightbearing on Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with The Femoral Neck System: A Comparative Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brendan P Mitchell, Seth A Tarrant, Zane D Littell, Nada L Jibbe, Rosalee E Zackula, Randall L Lais, Bradley R Dart\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative weightbearing management of patients surgically treated for femoral neck fractures is controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients treated with a fixed-angle implant, the Femoral Neck System (FNS), as a function of their postoperative weightbearing protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative cohort study of patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures who underwent fixation with the FNS at a Level I trauma center from 2019 to 2023 was conducted. Patients were assigned to either the weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) group or the toe-touch weightbearing (TTWB) group based on surgeon preference after each procedure. Primary outcome measures were postoperative complications and the need for revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, SF-12 score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 25 patients in the WBAT group and 19 in the TTWB group. Ten of 25 (40%) fracture union complications occurred in the WBAT cohort compared with 6 of 19 (32%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.565). Revision surgeries were required in 7 of 25 cases (28%) in the WBAT cohort compared with 3 of 19 (16%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.339). No statistically significant differences in VAS pain scores, SF-12 scores, or WOMAC scores between the groups were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in radiographic complications, reoperations, or functional outcome scores between the two postoperative weightbearing protocols. Our findings suggest that WBAT may be permitted in this patient cohort, thereby simplifying postoperative care for patients and surgeons.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"255-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389641/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股骨颈骨折术后患者的负重管理存在争议。本研究旨在比较使用固定角度股骨颈系统(FNS)治疗的患者的结果,作为其术后负重方案的功能。方法:对2019年至2023年在某一级创伤中心接受FNS固定的股骨颈囊内骨折患者进行比较队列研究。每次手术后,根据外科医生的喜好,患者被分配到耐受负重组(WBAT)或脚趾触摸负重组(TTWB)。主要结局指标为术后并发症和是否需要翻修手术。次要结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、SF-12评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎(WOMAC)评分。结果:WBAT组25例,TTWB组19例。WBAT组25例骨折愈合并发症中有10例(40%)发生,而TTWB组19例中有6例(32%)发生(p = 0.565)。WBAT组25例中有7例(28%)需要翻修手术,而TTWB组19例中有3例(16%)需要翻修手术(p = 0.339)。各组间VAS疼痛评分、SF-12评分、WOMAC评分均无统计学差异。结论:两种术后负重方案在影像学并发症、再手术或功能结局评分方面无统计学差异。我们的研究结果表明,在该患者队列中允许使用WBAT,从而简化患者和外科医生的术后护理。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Postoperative Weightbearing on Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with The Femoral Neck System: A Comparative Cohort Study.

Background: Postoperative weightbearing management of patients surgically treated for femoral neck fractures is controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients treated with a fixed-angle implant, the Femoral Neck System (FNS), as a function of their postoperative weightbearing protocol.

Methods: A comparative cohort study of patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures who underwent fixation with the FNS at a Level I trauma center from 2019 to 2023 was conducted. Patients were assigned to either the weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) group or the toe-touch weightbearing (TTWB) group based on surgeon preference after each procedure. Primary outcome measures were postoperative complications and the need for revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, SF-12 score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score.

Results: There were 25 patients in the WBAT group and 19 in the TTWB group. Ten of 25 (40%) fracture union complications occurred in the WBAT cohort compared with 6 of 19 (32%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.565). Revision surgeries were required in 7 of 25 cases (28%) in the WBAT cohort compared with 3 of 19 (16%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.339). No statistically significant differences in VAS pain scores, SF-12 scores, or WOMAC scores between the groups were found.

Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in radiographic complications, reoperations, or functional outcome scores between the two postoperative weightbearing protocols. Our findings suggest that WBAT may be permitted in this patient cohort, thereby simplifying postoperative care for patients and surgeons.

Level of evidence: III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书